At the 2009 Consumer Electronics Show, Jonathan Valin, Neil Gader, and I independently thought that one of the show’s most pleasant surprises was a stand-mount two-way from a then-unknown (to us) company called Volent. Made in Hong Kong and distributed in the U.S. by Laufer Teknik, the $4995 Volent Paragon VL-2 impressed us with its dynamics, transparency, and soundstaging. We mistakenly thought the VL-2 used a Heil Air-Motion Transformer tweeter, but later discovered that the tweeter is an unusual dual-ribbon unit designed by Volent. I immediately put the VL-2 on our short list of “must-review” products.

The VL-2’s large (for a stand-mount speaker) cabinet is unusually shaped, with faceted side panels that merge into the baffle. The side panels are also tapered toward the rear, giving the VL-2 a boat shape when viewed from the top. In addition, the top panel is sloped to further minimize parallel surfaces that could create standing waves inside the wool-stuffed enclosure. The cabinet is vented by a large port on the rear panel. Connection is made via a single pair of WBT binding posts. The Volent’s sensitivity is 87dB, and its impedance 6 ohms. The VL-2s were perfectly happy being driven by the 100W Pass Labs XA100.5 amplifiers.
The enclosure is stunning visually, with absolutely gorgeous woodwork. The side panels (and the side-panel facets that merge into the baffle) are veneered in a burled dark-red wood and lacquered to a high gloss. The top, bottom, and rear are finished in piano-black gloss. The baffle is covered in a black leather-like material.
The VL-2’s drivers are unusual; the 7** woofer is made from graphite and titanium, and the tweeter is, as noted, a twin-ribbon designed by Volent. Starting with the woofer, the cone is a sandwich of polymer foam coated with graphite and titanium. The patented motor system employs dual neodymium magnets and a copper Faraday ring. The driver has considerable excursion and power handling, as I witnessed when breaking in the VL-2 with organ music. The tweeter, designed by Volent in 2002, is a 1.5** dual side-by-side ribbon set back in a waveguide. This is a true ribbon in which the audio signal flows through the aluminum ribbon itself. (By contrast, a “quasi-ribbon” or “planar-magnetic” driver has signal conductors bonded to the diaphragm.) The pleated ribbon, which is only 0.006mm thick, is split into two side-by-side halves, a technique that Volent says produces the dispersion of a dome tweeter with the transient speed and other virtues of a ribbon. The driver reportedly extends to 50kHz. The dynamic woofer is crossed over to the ribbon at 1.8kHz.
The cabinet seems solidly constructed and the finish quality is outstanding.
Listening
I positioned the VL-2s on 24** Sound Anchor stands that put the tweeter at 37**, somewhat below the 42** height of my ears in the listening chair. After much experimentation, I installed feet of slightly unequal height between the speakers and stands so that the VL-2s were tilted back by about 10°. This put my ears more on-axis with the tweeter and resulted in greater air, life, and resolution. Such fiddling would be unnecessary with taller stands. These speakers are sensitive to listening height (a result of the narrower vertical radiation pattern of the ribbon compared with a dome tweeter) and to toe-in. The VL-2s, however, had much wider vertical dispersion than other ribbon speakers I’ve auditioned. The treble response of some ribbon-based loudspeakers drops off precipitously just a few degrees above the tweeter axis, but the VL-2 produced a more gradual roll-off. I ended up with the VL-2s moderately toed-in so that their axes crossed just behind the listening seat.
The qualities I heard at the CES demo that made the VL-2 such a standout were abundantly apparent in my listening room. Simply put, this is an amazingly great pair of loudspeakers for $5000. For starters, the VL-2 had unbelievable bass extension, weight, and bottom-end dynamics for the cabinet size. Had I not known the VL-2 was a stand-mount two-way, I would have guessed from listening that it was a floorstanding model. The VL-2 didn’t create faux extension with a hump in the midbass—it had genuine depth and dynamic impact in the bottom octaves. After hearing these qualities, I drove the VL-2 with more and more challenging music at higher and higher playback levels. Amazingly, it reproduced the dynamics and low-end sock of the extremely challenging orchestral recordings on Reference Recordings HRx 176.4kHz/24-bit files sourced from my music server. The massive bass weight and impact of Dance of the Tumblers from Exotic Dances, for example, was reproduced in full measure of authority. The VL-2 kept perfect composure, filling the room with a huge, unfettered, and believable sonic picture of an orchestra. That’s saying a lot for a $5000 stand-mounted two-way. The VL-2 even did a credible job with organ pedal tones. In rock and jazz, the VL-2 had a wonderfully solid bottom end, with explosive dynamics on kick drum and deep-tuned toms. Although I heard no cabinet resonances that colored the bass, I thought that on occasion I could hear the port’s contribution as a separate component of the bass. Overall, I’ll go so far as to say the VL-2 had the deepest extension and widest bass dynamics of any stand-mounted loudspeaker I’ve heard.
Comments
I own them and RH got the whole picture correctly, IMO. They are very fast and transparent yet musical, with powerful, clean bass. A bit forward in the lower highs, but oh so clean from top to bottom. When I use them in my big system, I need to shut down my subs. I've never done this with a standmount. As to value, all I can say is that I've never heard this level of sound for less $, and I've been looking for many years. As always, room/system/listener context will determine satisfaction, but for me these are the end of the rainbow in standmounts.
Nicely described, Bob!
jonbee, which do you prefer, these or your RM30's?
That's a question I've struggled with. Both are very good, but with different strengths and weaknesses. In my main listening room, the taller image height of the RM30s gives a better illusion of the real event. They are also a bit more forgiving of recording problems; that is, slightly mellower, smoother overall. So- in my larger room I prefer the RM30s by a tad.
However- there is no doubt that the VL-2s present a clearer, cleaner window, most notably from the lower mids on down. They are amazingly transparent in all parts of the range, whereas the RM30s carbon fiber woofers (used below 300 hz.) are not as clean and open as the very expensive ($600 ea. retail) woofers in the Volent. Also, one of the areas that I fault in the RM30, the relatively weak upper bass, is clearer and punchier in the Volent.
In my office, sitting about 5 feet from the Volents, the sound is astonishing- approaching the best I've ever heard. I do add some foam to fill the port about halfway full in the small room, hwever, to avoid overloading the bass.
Thank you for that reply....very helpful! I am in the market for a new pair of music-only speakers. I have been researching for about 6 months. I read your write-up on the RM30's when I came across it during my research. I was already considering a pair and they have remained in my "top 3" finalists for awhile now. My dedicated room is small...about 11.5' x 13.5' but with 9' nominal wall height and a vaulted ceiling above with irregular (but symmetrical) surfaces. Also, the front wall behind the speakers has a window bay in the middle to break up that surface. The Volent VL-2 intrigues me greatly. My primary "concern" at this early point is with their ability to play loudly (on occasion!) with sufficient visceral impact. However, I am an almost near-field listener, with my head 8' from my speakers. The VL-2's might do quite nicely in that environment. I listen to almost everything, electric or acoustic, except opera and hip-hop. Love jazz, classic rock, progressive rock, pop, even a little metal, and some chamber music and full symphony. The planar drivers and ribbon drivers have always intrigued me since I first heard the Apogee Caliper back in the day. I've been living with a pair of Thiel CS3.5's for many years, and love the detail and transparency. But it's time for something new! Thanks again for the thoughtful reply. I shall have to find a pair of VL-2's to audition!
As to volume capabilities- they can play pretty loudly without strain- at least 100 db peaks in a medium sized room, but they are not for real headbangers, imo.
My office is only 10x12, and I sit about 5 feet from them, and they are wonderful. It is interesting that you mentioned Calipers- I owned Caliper Sigs after I owned Divas, and I liked them a lot. For me, the VL-2 gives the same level of transparency, but are much more refined sounding. The Apogee 2 way planars to me had a top end edge to them which is not present in the 3 way Diva, or the Volent (or the VMPS, either).
The Volent won't give the image size of the big planars or the VMPS.I've been listening to them some more in my big system, particularly trying to get a handle on the weaknesses they have. I can't say they are perfect, so here are the weaknesses as I hear it.
To me, the lower treble sounds recessed by a couple of db. This adds to the sense of depth, but as Harley mentioned treble instruments like cymbals, while exquisitely detailed and defined, lack a bit of body. Well recorded snare drums get the snares perfectly, but the skins are a bit recessed. The high overtones on brasses sound just a bit recessed. Not a huge suckout, but noticeable compared to the VMPS, which have more energy in that zone.
There is also a bit more sibilance than I'm used to, but they are far from ear bleeders for me.
I asked my wife this AM what her take on them was, and she feels the same way- very accurate, transparent and refined, yet smaller sounding than the VMPS. The VMPS also have a bit easier sound, but not quite as incisive. This latest round of comparison led us both to vote for the VMPS in the larger room, but it is safe to say we could happily live long term with the VL-2 there. BTW, I do prefer both the RM-30s and the VL-2s with my pair of ACI Force XL subs in the mix, crossed over at 35 hz(24 db/octave), but turned way down so as add a bit of weight but not be audible by themselves.
That about sums up the issues I've found, using as fine a comb as I have.These are not serious, but are part of their character. At $5k retail we should expect a lot, and anyone considering them should hear them if they can, of course.
I took a chance and bought mine unheard, but a large discount reduced the risk somewhat.
Very, very helpful. Perspective is everything, and you have detailed yours very well. I live in a somewhat "geographically isolated" area when it comes to having opportunities to audition anything much, so this all helps when it comes down to deciding where to travel and what to make a point to audition, and even what to consider purchasing without an audition if the distances are just too far. I've done both in the past...Traveled far to listen, and also purchased without an audition! And large discounts are always good!
It's been a long time since I've heard any Apogees, and even then it was only for a couple hours in a good dealer room. But I still remember how "real" they sounded to me playing a Telarc sampler I had taken along. I had never heard any speaker before that seemed to get so much of itself "out of the way." I suppose that was primarily the transparent nature of their playback I was experiencing.
Thanks again. By the way, I came across your VL-2 review at the Asylum today also, and it was well done.
Nice review. I didn't see speakers listed in the associated equipment section. Could you share what other speakers you had on hand during the review period and maybe a little about how they compared to these?
I haven't heard these myself, but if the Volent VL-2 does get a ribbon to radiate like a dome, they have cracked a major deficiency in tweeter design. Going back to Sequerra's Pyramids 25 years ago, everyone has been tempted to use ribbons in their speakers, but unless you build a ribbon 6-feet tall, they beam to a small "sweetspot" that is unacceptably small.
BTW, I agree with Bob--I won't mention names (well, there are too many guilty parties in the high-end these days anyway), but anything built this well utilizing original technology automatically goes deep into the 5-figure market. Congrats on making this affordable to the people who will most appreciate it.
RonLev
Great review - spending the most space on the listening experience and really describing the character of these speakers. RonLve, I agree that the speakers on review break important barriers, and I, for one, would love to hear them. Really, it sounds like a breakthrough product (esp the tweater design) The design is really clever and may be a an even better solution to ribbon's limitations than waveguides. However, I don't agree that current Ribbon tweaters are unacceptably limited; my waveguid(ed) ribbon tweeters (contained in RM30's) serve me really well - horizontal dispersion is great by any measure and I have a wide sweetspot. Vertical dispersion is just OK, but I sit for my critical listening so it's not an issue. As with all things, there are tradeoffs - the highs are way more natural than most domes, and are sibilance free, and the highs are well integrated with the rest of the spectrum, rather than sitting above it as with some domes - but I'd say they're not quite as dynamic as some dome tweeters. For me, the tradeoff is worth it.
I've used many ribbon tweeters, and this one is unique in 2 ways- it it very wide range (crossed over at 18 or 1900 hz.), and it does have much better horizontal and lateral dispersion than other ribbons. It is still not as widely and uniformly dispersing as a good small dome, imo, but is definitely a leap forward for ribbons.
I'd really love to hear the larger Volent models- I think this company is making some products that are making a real contribution.
Jonbee,
You are lucky in having a clever mind to choose one of the best price-value ratio's bookshelf. I listened to the speakers many times, though have not owe it so far. The dyanmic, details and transparent is very top class. The actual performance may not worse than some bookshelf selling at 4-5 times of its price.
However, if I have space, and money ( not yet), I must choose the latest Volent VL 3.5 floorstand. You have to listen to it if have chance and to find out why I say that.
Regards,
Ray
I would love to hear them. The design does look great, but there is very limited distribution of the brand in the US. That's why I had to buy the VL-2 unheard. At these prices most 'philes won't take the risk.
very tru!. Volent is a new brand and do not advertising in the way many Hi-End brand doing. But by reputation from buyers's feedback, there should be a better distribution in coming years. I am a lucky guy to be in Hong Kong and can have chance to go directly to Volent's place and hear them.
Hello. I had the chance to pick up an used VL2. I'm wondering what kind of amp you are using for them. I have a Audio Space AS3i (EL34) that I feel drive them very nicely and a Naim Supernait as a solid state in the 2nd system with much more power. But I'm curious to know what you are using. Thanks
I've used several amps. My big system has a PS Audio GCC-500, modded by Cullen Circuits. I've also used a tiny Rawson Gainclone, which also does a credible job in small rooms. They are in my bedroom now, powered by a battery powered Tripath amp which I modelled after the RWA 30.2 integrated. It is a very beautiful sound, but not for large rooms.
It looks like you've got a couple of good choices. I think if an amp has good woofer control, great detail and a smooth top end it sould sound great. I'm not sure if the EL34 has the woofer conrol you need, but the Naim looks good on paper.
I just wrote up a comparison to the Merlin TSM-MME on Audio Asylum. The Volents are easily better, in nearly every way. I love mine, and even though I get itchy for change ouot of boredom, I believe the Volents can't be beaten overall at their used prices. Have fun!
Jonbee,
You are lucky in having a clever mind to choose one of the best price-value ratio's bookshelf. I listened to the speakers many times, though have not buy it so far. The dyanmic, details and transparent is very top class. The actual performance may not worse than some bookshelf selling at 4-5 times of its price.
However, if I have space, and money ( not yet), I must choose the latest Volent VL 3.5 floorstand. You have to listen to it if have chance and to find out why I say that.
Regards,
Ray
Ray,
I recently got a pair of VL-2's and am crazy about them. I would love to hear the 3.5's at some point. have you heard them against the VL-4's? I was wondering which sounded better in your opinion.
Hydroscope,
Sorry that I haven't seen your message until now. This is also an interesting question to me. I had heard VL 3.5 in their workshop for quite many hours in many of my visits. ( sorry that I am so poor to own any of Volent's product yet) But I have no experience VL 4s yet. However, as long as I heard comments from Volent's staffs, I "thought" that VL 3.5 is not really interior than VL 4s. VL 4s can get lower bass to 20 Hz as you see in the specification. But VL 3.5 also has very good quality in bass as you know the most expensive bass drivers ( not 100% sure recently, as some new units nowadays) it's using. There is no reason to disappoint of the bass performance of VL 3.5, the bass can go crazy deep and very linear even around 3x Hz, yes, spec only go to 28 Hz, but it's also hard for adult to hear much below 30 Hz. VL 3.5 using ceramic mid to high driver which is sweet and very details I felt. but VL 4's use air-motion transformer unit which is give very 3D spacious and detailed sonic performance( only by my estimation as I heard other speakers with the same driver). I haven't heard them side by side, I can only comment it by some of my limited experience and knowledge. In my opinion, if you love VL 3.5, you need not to bother the VL 4.
Afterall, you will taste VL 3.5 & VL 4 differently. both 3.5 & 4 are excellent in sonic quality and much better than VL 3 & VL 2 as I can compare. I conclude that VL 3.5 & VL 4 are designed for different preference of favor and needed, after I talked to the designer.