
More than any other electrostatic speaker of its era the KLH Model Nine was the watershed moment that proclaimed the full-range ’stat had indeed come of age. The vision of peripatetic designer and collaborator Henry Kloss (his fingerprints are also on this list’s AR3a and the Double Advents), the Model Nine and its more potent iteration known by well-heeled owners as Double Nines, is significant in that it took the transcendent qualities (midrange transparency, resolution speed, and low distortion) of the parlor room-restricted Quad ESL and added properties like 40Hz bass extension and improved output. But this six-foot dipolar had an attitude—fussy about placement and greedy for power, it blew fuses with regularity. It could be beamy in the treble, too, but when all the stars aligned few cone speakers could match this naturalistic combination of liquidity, speed, and power, making it the rare companion able to capture near symphonic playback levels. The Model Nine has been the inspiration for virtually every planar-style loudspeaker since.
Neil Gader

This was the last version of the original Infinity Reference System, and, by any measure, the best, standing second to none in frequency range, in a top-to-bottom coherency that had eluded designer Arnie Nudell in the earlier three versions (yes, three, there was no IV), and in an overall faithfulness to the real thing that exceeded Nudell’s best previous efforts. The EMIT tweeters had been considerably updated (so that there was less grain, less artificial brightness, and a sound just a few steps below that of Jim Winey’s Magnepan true ribbon); the EMIT and the ENIN midranges (a replacement for the Series One’s bipolar ribbons) were both now planar “ribbons”; and the non-Watkins graphite-fiber woofers, all 12 of them, were now powered by a 2000-watt amp (up from 1500 in the Series III). What this, finally, accomplished, along with a few other mods, was a seamless sonic transition between the bass and the upper drivers—a first in a Nudell product. A dream realized and a dream for this listener.
Harry Pearson

Of all the loudspeakers I’ve heard in a lifetime of listening, the large, three-panel Maggie 1-Us—Magnepan’s first widely marketed planar-magnetic speaker—remain the most memorable. I’ve told the story several times before of how I originally (and unwittingly) auditioned these speakers in the early 70s and—not knowing what a Magneplanar was back then—assumed that the real grand piano ensconced behind the “screens” at the far end of the listening room was making music when, in fact (and of course), it was the Maggies that were doing same. I’ve never again been fooled that completely by a loudspeaker because nothing I’ve heard since then has sounded that much more like the real thing than the Maggie 1-Us did at the dawn of the high-end era. As HP put it in his ground-breaking TAS review: “The Magneplanars are…[a] ‘classic’…a speaker that is and will be a standard by which and to which others will be compared.” And so they were, and so they still are, in certain key respects (such as midrange realism and mid-to-upper bass resolution, scale, and slam), to me.
Jonathan Valin

One should always be wary of pronouncing “firsts,” but, appearing in the early seventies, Jon Dahlquist’s DQ‑10 was to my knowledge the first dynamic speaker to employ multiple drivers in an open-baffle configuration (except the acoustic‑suspension woofer, which was enclosed) staggered for proper time‑alignment and phase coherence, in an attempt to realize the openness and freedom from boxiness that Dahlquist prized in his beloved Quad ESL-57s—with the added advantages of deeper bass and dynamic extension well beyond the Quad. (The physical resemblance to the Quad was both mandated by the design and an intentional homage.) Far from flawless (including conceptually), the DQ-10 was nevertheless a ground-breaking design that preceded dozens of subsequent speakers (perhaps most prominent among them models from KEF, B&W, Spica, Thiel, Vandersteen, and Wilson) continuing up to the present day. Few large, full-range dynamic speakers before or for some time afterward equaled its openness.
Paul Seydor
Comments
I like your analysis here. DQ-10's - awful. The 801's were the first 'properly sorted' speakers I ever heard. I was about 14, La Jolla CA, it was my friends' uncle's house (subsequently turned out to be a coke dealer!) and it was the best music system I'd ever experienced-old school: McIntosh/Nakamichi/B+W 801's. My friend and I listened to AC/DC 'Highway to Hell'. Glory days... It was a serious moment for me and led to my lifelong passion for the proper reproduction of music. So, clearly an influential loudspeaker for me. Anyhow, I appreciated your comments!
Hmmm... No Apogee Acoustics full range ribbon loudspeakers are mentioned,,, at all?!?!? Scintilla, Grand, Mini-Grand etc.? No? I'm not now entirely sure of the rules or remit at play in this 'best of'. Though I'm a solid fan/owner/enjoyer of these remarkable and ground-breaking instruments, I also wonder where any horn-based loudspeakers reside. I suspect this is not a serious effort but at least that allows someone else to do things 'properly'.
There are many other fine speakers,the apogee included but,they weren't the pioneers of what the speaker was.For instance,the apogee was made to compete with the magmepans and we know the mags were here much earlier than apogee. Quad was original in design concept.Khorns were original and the list goes on.
As for the Mini II, I note that other companies were using alluminum enclosures before Magico inc. the Krell LAT which JV loved.
Also, I hardly think the Magico's were groundbreaking on CAD design. MANY speaker companies were using this before !! JM Lab Utopias, Wilson, etc.
As for the composite cones - it's possible they were among the first. But I find it hard to believe that these guys beat Scandinavia (Europe) - who were always first-in-line on drive-unit technology. There might be other breakthroughs that are just as significant.
Finally, I think the LS3/5a and WATT monitors had *much more* to do with influencing that segment of the speaker market. The Magicos are simply too new to know their full impact.
Although my admiration for Henry Kloss' contributions to audio is unbounded, most of the credit for the design and development of the KLH Model Nine should go to Arthur A. Janszen, the man who invented the first practical electrostatic loudspeaker and was a vice president of KLH when this truly significant speaker was developed and ultimately marketed.
I owned a pair of these speakers. And it's true that they took midrange and high frequency accuracy to new heights. But they were very difficult to drive, had a limited dynamic range, tepid bass response, and introduced owners to issues of speaker placement that had never before been encountered.
Having said all that, if I was the person who assembled this list, I would certainly include the KLH Model Nine.
The story I heard was that Kloss had nothing to do with the Nines save for supplying a corner of his factory, where they were built by Janszen at the rate of about one pair per week. Kloss simply wanted to have the prestige of the Nines in his line. I was unaware of any other relationship between KLH and Janszen. He had his own companies making add-on ES tweeters (Janszen and, later, RTR). He also may have made the panels for the Infinity SS. My memory of some of this may be faulty.
The controversy over this top-twelve list is hardly surprising. My two cents: I would not have included the Advents, large, small or whichever tweeters. There was nothing earth-shattering about them, just another two (despite the picture) cones in a box design. They just happened to sound better than the AR-3a's at less than half the price--and I did own and love them at some point. They were evolutionary, not revolutionary. Due to their bargain price-point they became very popular so in that sense I guess they were iconic of their time. I would have included Acoustats, some model. They were the first ESL, as far as I know, that weren't out having a fried diaphragm replaced every other week.
IHMO the Klipshorn has never been beat. Owning a pair of these is like sitting front row center at Symphony Hall and listening to the Boston Symphony live. I've listened to many speakers in my day and these have never been beat. It's sad that today's generation in the digital age will never appreciate or understand a true symphonic sound with an MP3 player/IPad and earphones.
No mention of Peter Snell's Type A or Lincoln Walsh's Ohm Walsh 5? The story of Lincoln's untimely death just days before recieving his confirmation paperwork from the U.S Patent office, heart splitting as it was, surely merits reflection for us as devoted audio advocates in the historical context of our brilliant hobby.
For this alone, I feel the idea of a revision should be considered, thoughtfully and carefully. scott strother
music is the answer.
I think one ought to look at the Wharfedale SFB/3 if considering a multi-way OB. Perhaps the DQ10s were the first with time aligned drivers, but the SFB/3 certainly was the first multi-way OB that I am aware of. Considered excellent when new (in comparison to the original Quad ESLs of 1957(?)). The Quads apparently did a few things better than the Wharfedales, whilst the Wharfedales did a few things better than the Quads. Both approximately the same size (the area of OB portion of the SFB/3 and the Quads). Now a great DIY thing to try, if using a respectable group of drivers (multi-way or single drivers). They do need a fair sized room so as to not "overcome" the room, and good amplification is a must.
In no way am I trying to take anything away from the DQ10s. I've never even seen a pair in the flesh, nor heard any.