TESTED: Focal Grande Utopia EM Loudspeaker

Standing Tall

It’s also a chameleon, the same ease with which it reveals changes in its own state of tune effortlessly exposing shortcomings in system setup and partnering equipment. The contrasting virtues of different front-ends, their behavior under warm up, and the importance of carefully considered support have all rarely been clearer. A speaker like this attracts audiophiles like bees round a honey pot. I’ve been beating them off with a stick, but none of those who have slipped under the guard have gone away anything other than bowled over: Something else this Grande shares with the Isis—the ability to readjust a listener’s notions of what is possible. Seldom has a speaker looked so striking and sounded so unlike it looks.

For many (most?), the cost of the Grandes and the space required to accommodate them will mean they remain a pipe-dream, but their tonal, spatial and temporal coherence, their extended bandwidth, and their truly astonishing dynamic capabilities (at both ends of the spectrum) put them in a very select category indeed. They rub shoulders with the Isis—and probably Wilson’s X2, although that’s one speaker that I haven’t had at home. This select group really are do-it-all speakers, whose weaknesses and shortcomings have more to do with practicality and matching than gross failings in performance. Indeed, they do less damage to the signal than a lot of matching electronics.

From a company’s point of view there are many different reasons to build a flagship speaker, from attention seeking to trickle down. But confronted by a $180,000 product, reviewers and potential purchasers need ask only one question: Does this speaker go straight to the top of my “if I won the lottery” list? Well, as far as I’m concerned the Grand Utopia EM is firmly ensconced atop that pile, waiting to be shot at. Bring on the competition.

 

Conclusion

With the Grande Utopia EM, Focal has made a serious statement of intent, one that challenges the boundaries of speaker performance. That makes it worthy of more attention than we can give it here, and attention from more than one reviewer too.

This is one that will run and run, in the sense of other views and also other products, as much for what they say about the Grande as vice versa.  

__________

Electromagnetic Drive in the Grande Utopia EM

The “EM” in the Grande Utopia EM’s name stands for “electromagnetic,” the drive principle employed in the woofer. Before looking at how this works, let’s review the operating principle of a conventional moving-coil driver.

The power amplifier drives alternating current (the audio signal) through the voice coil, generating a varying magnetic field around the coil that is an analog of the audio signal. The varying magnetic field changes its north-south orientation at the audio signal frequency because the audio signal is alternating current—the current flow reverses direction at the frequency of the audio signal. Send 1000Hz to the driver and the current flow through the voice coil reverses direction 1000 times per second. This reversing magnetic field created by current flow through the voice coil alternately pushes and pulls against the fixed magnetic field generated by the driver’s permanent magnet, causing the voice coil to be pulled back and forth, and with it, the cone.

This approach, used in virtually all modern moving-coil loudspeaker drivers, runs up against the laws of physics. Specifically, the magnetic field strength generated by the fixed magnets is limited, which in turn places restrictions on the cone weight, how low in frequency the driver will play, and how sensitive the driver is. A heavy cone goes lower in frequency (all other factors being equal), but requires greater magnetic-field strength surrounding the voice coil to drive it.

Focal’s solution to this physics problem is to replace the driver’s fixed magnets with a large coil that functions as an electromagnet. The coil is driven with direct current from an outboard power supply that plugs into an AC outlet. This current flow through the coil creates the magnetic field against which the voice-coil–generated magnetic field pushes and pulls. The electro-magnet produces a magnetic field strength in the gap (the area in which the voice coil sits) nearly double that of a conventionally driven woofer. Consequently, the EM’s woofer can be heavier (giving it a lower resonant frequency) yet simultaneously more efficient. Moreover, the woofer’s bass output can be adjusted by varying the current through the electromagnetic coil. This is accomplished in the EM via a rotary switch on the outboard supply that drives current through the electromagnetic coil. One can thus adjust the EM’s bass output to better integrate the system into a variety of listening rooms.

Comments

Budman (not verified) -- Thu, 07/16/2009 - 21:21

$180 K! Are you sh!tt!n me? You can by a 3 bedroom, 2 bath house in MANY cities for less than that these days! If you have this kind of money you aren't reading this online magazine. Besides, what's the 'diminishing returns' factor here? $180 K? Are you kidding me?!?!?!

zoroaster (not verified) -- Mon, 07/20/2009 - 19:37

products like these are made for bragging rights in the industry, and sold to millionaires or companies in the music/film industry. I doubt they had the 3 bedroom 2 bath nuclear family in mind while trying to market them.

Budman (not verified) -- Thu, 07/16/2009 - 21:21

$180 K! Are you sh!tt!n me? You can buy a 3 bedroom, 2 bath house in MANY cities for less than that these days! If you have this kind of money you aren't reading this online magazine. Besides, what's the 'diminishing returns' factor here? $180 K? Are you kidding me?!?!?!

Doedrums (not verified) -- Thu, 07/16/2009 - 21:47

I agree Budman.  Anybody paying 180 grand for a pair of SPEAKERS needs to have their head examined.  Are they 180 thousand times better than a pair of $1000 towers?  I don't think so.  It is just about the bragging rights.

Zorst (not verified) -- Thu, 07/16/2009 - 22:43

These companies should get serious send these to china to build make them for 5 hundred to a thousand a pair and sell them for 10k  I would buy a set for that if they sound as good as they suggest here.   Problem is most people would not even pay 10k  so they are looking for some fat cats that don't have time to compare speakers, and are willing to pay top dollar for the most expensive just to say they did.
 
 

Doc S (not verified) -- Thu, 07/16/2009 - 23:43

GAWDAM! The politics of envy and denigration have made it to the High End.
If you don't like the speakers, you don't have to buy them. BUT...  non-specific
criticism is just evidence of having an Attitude and expecting it to be considered  as
a thoughtful Opinion.

Anonymous9624 (not verified) -- Fri, 07/17/2009 - 01:59

we still get cabinets made of veneered / painted MDF!  Hmmm..... 
Where's the aerotech advances in that?

Anonymous9624 (not verified) -- Fri, 07/17/2009 - 02:00

The price of a Ferrari, yet ... we still get cabinets made of veneered / painted MDF!  Hmmm..... 
Where's the aerotech advances in that?

Peter (not verified) -- Fri, 07/17/2009 - 15:47

... the equation that we mere mortals make does not apply. Yes, you can buy a house for that sort of money. But in some regions in Asia or Africa, people can buy a house for the amount you and I pay for our relatively modest listening setup. So what we consider decent price/performance will be considered as silly by people who earn less than 10% of what we make.
And that works the other way around too. People who are seriously loaded don't buy 180k houses. For people who can actually easily afford to buy these speakers, they may well be worth the money.
If price/performance were a fixed equation, we'd all be listening to music on an iPod with Sennheiser PX200 headphones. And drive a Tata Nano, for that matter.

Oddio (not verified) -- Fri, 07/17/2009 - 17:21

Doedrums,are you shittin me? One thousand dollars for a pair of towers? What are the diminishing returns on that? I can get great towers at sears for $99.00. A re you shittin me?( Waiting for the next guy to undercut that)

Andrea (not verified) -- Sat, 07/18/2009 - 14:44

 I would agree $180,000 is an offense to decency and intelligence. However, "sellability" is not really the reason why these speakers have been made. Focal has a wide range of products, a many different price points; this is an excercize in discovering what technology the business will have to focus on moving forward, technologies -- as well as materials, construction processes, etc. -- which in the future will be applied to the lower end models which is where the market is at.
This practice isn't any different from many other businesses: for example, car racing (nascar, formula 1, rallies, etc.) is a discipline established to test  solutions to be implemented in the standard models for mass production. These are speakers for showrooms, for CES, for magazine reviews. Yes, someone will buy these, my local audio store has them too; however, how many listen to these bad boys -- I wonder -- and end up purchasing a Focal loudspeaker in the 1-4K range?
 

nd (not verified) -- Sat, 07/18/2009 - 20:19

You get what you pay for. I bought a pair of these speakers for the bedroom to make the compressed MP3s in my iPod sound better. And they did. Well worth it.
I wonder if they make a 7.1 surround system for about 2 million dollars. I really need those for the den.

Zappa (not verified) -- Sat, 07/18/2009 - 23:26

It really scares me when I read outrage regarding prices of statement products like these.  I don't think this or any other company is trying to talk Budman et al out of buying homes.  These speakers are obviously a labor of love for the people involved, including the reviewer.  For them, selling is not the point... it's the creative process of making the best.  Mr. Gregory is doing a great service to all of the people with less than movie star incomes by showing us what is among the Holy Grail products out there & letting look into them a little further if we choose.  Please don't speak for me or anyone else about something being too expensive to buy.  People pay that kind of money all the time for things... like cars, vacations, weddings, wives and ex-wives.  So Budman et al:  if you need a raise, don't complain here.  Find a new job.

Replevin (not verified) -- Sat, 07/25/2009 - 14:40

"People pay that kind of money all the time for things... like cars, vacations, weddings, wives and ex-wives.  So Budman et al:  if you need a raise, don't complain here."
Well said.  I have never understood the criticism of expensive audio gear when guys spend that kind of money on fishing boats, cars and everything else (yes, including ex-wives).  Does Budman write to Car & Driver, "You can buy 6 Camry's for the price of that Ferrari!" 
The magazine is The Absolute Sound - not Speakers for Middle Managers. 

JT (not verified) -- Tue, 12/15/2009 - 16:01

I'll double that

JimA (not verified) -- Fri, 04/23/2010 - 22:28

I will triple that. If one cannot enjoy the state-of-the art, then please by all means, go listen to a Bose.

All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1999 - 2011 NextScreen. All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.