TESTED: Focal Grande Utopia EM Loudspeaker

Standing Tall

The other big change in bass implementation is the move to a flow-port arrangement, which feeds the output of the downward-facing port through a wide, forward-facing slot between the bottom of the cabinet and the plinth. This improves the port’s interface with the room and also keeps it more consistent when it comes to boundary conditions.

 

Adjustable Crossover

Like everything else in loudspeaker design, making the most of the advances made with the bass unit was a question of balance, weighing up how much of the benefit to spend on overall system sensitivity, how much on adjustability. Setting the range of adjustment at ±3dB allows an overall system sensitivity of 94dB. As well as significant level-compensation at low frequencies, this allows the elimination of subtractive components in the mid and treble crossovers, components that limit transparency and dynamic response.

But Focal wanted to further increase user optimization, and settled on a set of high-quality jumpers to give three-step settings that enable users to tweak crossover slopes between mid and treble, as well as tweeter and midbass levels and sub-bass Q. Add in the level control on the bass PSU and that’s 1458 permutations. Thankfully, the discrete and repeatable nature of each step makes the process simple to execute and easy to navigate. The upper range adjustments give a tilt and “smoothness” function to compensate for the liveliness or balance of the room, but it’s the ability to balance midbass and sub-bass levels against low-bass Q that is critical to achieving the scale, presence, and coherent dynamic range of which the Grande is capable, and which represents one of the key breakthrough developments.

However, one unforeseen effect of the elimination of subtractive elements as well as the increase in bass transparency and lower levels of low-frequency distortion was increased audibility of crossover component quality, necessitating in turn, a complete overhaul of crossover components (including the development of dedicated designs) and the selection (by blind listening) of new internal wiring. Only with these developments in place was it possible to fully realize the potential of all the other advances, finally delivering the kind of step-change in low-frequency performance that characterized the impact of the beryllium tweeter on the upper reaches of the second-generation Utopia Bes.

 

Feeding The Beast

Installing any speaker that weighs 572 pounds is always going to be an issue, but the Grandes proved easier than most. The fact that the top cabinet element is removable helps reduce the weight a little and the height to manageable proportions, while the integral casters allow you to roll the speakers straight out of its crate and into place—as well as helping with fine-tuning once they’re up and running and before installation of the (necessarily) substantial spikes. Once the speakers are in situ, the top box needs to be lifted into place (a two-person job) and the power supplies connected. Then, you can finally start thinking about all those adjustments. I opted to position the speakers for optimum performance with the controls set flat before any further refinement, finally settling on a combination of 1.5dB mid and sub-bass cut with a notch increase in Q.

Two other points need to be made about the feeding of the Grandes: Despite a 94dB sensitivity, small amps are out; and it matters how you feed the power supplies. On the latter point, don’t skimp on the AC power cords—you will hear the difference. And on the former, even the impressively linear, tactile, and well-controlled 20W output of the Vacuum State monoblocks didn’t do justice to this speaker’s frequency extremes. Around ten times that is a more sensible target, with the Levinson 383 and both the Ayre and Berning monoblocks all putting in sterling service. Power and
load tolerance is definitely the order of the day.

Comments

Budman (not verified) -- Thu, 07/16/2009 - 21:21

$180 K! Are you sh!tt!n me? You can by a 3 bedroom, 2 bath house in MANY cities for less than that these days! If you have this kind of money you aren't reading this online magazine. Besides, what's the 'diminishing returns' factor here? $180 K? Are you kidding me?!?!?!

zoroaster (not verified) -- Mon, 07/20/2009 - 19:37

products like these are made for bragging rights in the industry, and sold to millionaires or companies in the music/film industry. I doubt they had the 3 bedroom 2 bath nuclear family in mind while trying to market them.

Budman (not verified) -- Thu, 07/16/2009 - 21:21

$180 K! Are you sh!tt!n me? You can buy a 3 bedroom, 2 bath house in MANY cities for less than that these days! If you have this kind of money you aren't reading this online magazine. Besides, what's the 'diminishing returns' factor here? $180 K? Are you kidding me?!?!?!

Doedrums (not verified) -- Thu, 07/16/2009 - 21:47

I agree Budman.  Anybody paying 180 grand for a pair of SPEAKERS needs to have their head examined.  Are they 180 thousand times better than a pair of $1000 towers?  I don't think so.  It is just about the bragging rights.

Zorst (not verified) -- Thu, 07/16/2009 - 22:43

These companies should get serious send these to china to build make them for 5 hundred to a thousand a pair and sell them for 10k  I would buy a set for that if they sound as good as they suggest here.   Problem is most people would not even pay 10k  so they are looking for some fat cats that don't have time to compare speakers, and are willing to pay top dollar for the most expensive just to say they did.
 
 

Doc S (not verified) -- Thu, 07/16/2009 - 23:43

GAWDAM! The politics of envy and denigration have made it to the High End.
If you don't like the speakers, you don't have to buy them. BUT...  non-specific
criticism is just evidence of having an Attitude and expecting it to be considered  as
a thoughtful Opinion.

Anonymous9624 (not verified) -- Fri, 07/17/2009 - 01:59

we still get cabinets made of veneered / painted MDF!  Hmmm..... 
Where's the aerotech advances in that?

Anonymous9624 (not verified) -- Fri, 07/17/2009 - 02:00

The price of a Ferrari, yet ... we still get cabinets made of veneered / painted MDF!  Hmmm..... 
Where's the aerotech advances in that?

Peter (not verified) -- Fri, 07/17/2009 - 15:47

... the equation that we mere mortals make does not apply. Yes, you can buy a house for that sort of money. But in some regions in Asia or Africa, people can buy a house for the amount you and I pay for our relatively modest listening setup. So what we consider decent price/performance will be considered as silly by people who earn less than 10% of what we make.
And that works the other way around too. People who are seriously loaded don't buy 180k houses. For people who can actually easily afford to buy these speakers, they may well be worth the money.
If price/performance were a fixed equation, we'd all be listening to music on an iPod with Sennheiser PX200 headphones. And drive a Tata Nano, for that matter.

Oddio (not verified) -- Fri, 07/17/2009 - 17:21

Doedrums,are you shittin me? One thousand dollars for a pair of towers? What are the diminishing returns on that? I can get great towers at sears for $99.00. A re you shittin me?( Waiting for the next guy to undercut that)

Andrea (not verified) -- Sat, 07/18/2009 - 14:44

 I would agree $180,000 is an offense to decency and intelligence. However, "sellability" is not really the reason why these speakers have been made. Focal has a wide range of products, a many different price points; this is an excercize in discovering what technology the business will have to focus on moving forward, technologies -- as well as materials, construction processes, etc. -- which in the future will be applied to the lower end models which is where the market is at.
This practice isn't any different from many other businesses: for example, car racing (nascar, formula 1, rallies, etc.) is a discipline established to test  solutions to be implemented in the standard models for mass production. These are speakers for showrooms, for CES, for magazine reviews. Yes, someone will buy these, my local audio store has them too; however, how many listen to these bad boys -- I wonder -- and end up purchasing a Focal loudspeaker in the 1-4K range?
 

nd (not verified) -- Sat, 07/18/2009 - 20:19

You get what you pay for. I bought a pair of these speakers for the bedroom to make the compressed MP3s in my iPod sound better. And they did. Well worth it.
I wonder if they make a 7.1 surround system for about 2 million dollars. I really need those for the den.

Zappa (not verified) -- Sat, 07/18/2009 - 23:26

It really scares me when I read outrage regarding prices of statement products like these.  I don't think this or any other company is trying to talk Budman et al out of buying homes.  These speakers are obviously a labor of love for the people involved, including the reviewer.  For them, selling is not the point... it's the creative process of making the best.  Mr. Gregory is doing a great service to all of the people with less than movie star incomes by showing us what is among the Holy Grail products out there & letting look into them a little further if we choose.  Please don't speak for me or anyone else about something being too expensive to buy.  People pay that kind of money all the time for things... like cars, vacations, weddings, wives and ex-wives.  So Budman et al:  if you need a raise, don't complain here.  Find a new job.

Replevin (not verified) -- Sat, 07/25/2009 - 14:40

"People pay that kind of money all the time for things... like cars, vacations, weddings, wives and ex-wives.  So Budman et al:  if you need a raise, don't complain here."
Well said.  I have never understood the criticism of expensive audio gear when guys spend that kind of money on fishing boats, cars and everything else (yes, including ex-wives).  Does Budman write to Car & Driver, "You can buy 6 Camry's for the price of that Ferrari!" 
The magazine is The Absolute Sound - not Speakers for Middle Managers. 

JT (not verified) -- Tue, 12/15/2009 - 16:01

I'll double that

JimA (not verified) -- Fri, 04/23/2010 - 22:28

I will triple that. If one cannot enjoy the state-of-the art, then please by all means, go listen to a Bose.

All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1999 - 2011 NextScreen. All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.