
The Grande Utopia EM actually consists of a plinth and five cabinets, but is physically divided into three separate elements: the tweeter enclosure, the two boxes above it, and the two boxes below that sit on the plinth. The top and bottom pairs are actually fixed assemblies, their boxes physically fixed together. The clever bit is that the tweeter cabinet moves relative to the bass and midrange below it, as does the midrange and mid/bass unit pairing above it, thus allowing the listener to tighten or loosen the baffle curve depending on listening distance. But with a speaker system that weighs around 572 pounds, the notion of adjusting these elements and then holding them stable while fixing them was clearly out of the question. Instead, Focal has implemented a mechanical arrangement of moving wedges that is simple, precise and repeatable. A drop down flap on the rear of the lower midrange cabinet contains (amongst other things) a beautifully machined crank handle. Fit it into the socket in the back of the tweeter cabinet and each turn raises or lowers the upper elements, the top two cabinets by exactly twice as much as the tweeter enclosure, thus preserving the correct arc. A mechanical/numerical counter allows you to set the angles precisely and the whole exercise will take one person a matter of moments.
The end result contributes not only to the striking appearance of the Grande EM, but also to the easy optimization of its sound, with quite small adjustments in tilt having a profound effect on the presentation and balance of the sound.
Virtually all loudspeakers employ what are now considered conventional bass units, using permanent magnets in their motor systems. These are generally driven passively, but increasingly, in search of greater level, extension and control, designers are resorting to active drive at low frequencies. It’s an undeniably attractive option, offering far greater extension and weight from smaller cabinet volumes, as well as a degree of tuning adjustment to match room conditions.
However, it is not without its own set of compromises, with complexity, cost, amplifier quality, and system integration all posing significant issues. After all, the inside of a speaker cabinet can best be described as a hostile environment for vibration-sensitive electronics, and active crossovers need to match the quality of the preamp used in the system, not too much of a challenge in an AV setup, but really hard to achieve in a high-end rig. And that’s before we even get to the question of amplifier quality and top-to-bottom continuity.
For a speaker like the Grande, where size and cost were largely irrelevant and quality of performance is everything, another solution needed to be found. Perhaps typically, it came from combining forward thinking and new technology with a concept that, in hi-fi terms at least, could be described as positively ancient: the electromagnetic drive-unit. In the days before powerful amps and high-quality, high-power permanent magnets, speaker manufacturers resorted to electromagnets to energize their drivers. You want more bass, more efficiency? Just turn up the power fed to the coil. Of course, it’s not quite that simple, especially when applied to a driver and system with the power demands and bandwidth of the big Utopia, as Robert Harley explains in his sidebar. But the attraction of a driver with not just significantly greater power, but also an inbuilt level of adjustability was just too attractive to pass over, and Focal poured massive effort and resources into achieving its goal. The results are impressive, even from a purely numerical standpoint.
Compared to the driver in the previous Grande, the 400mm EM driver offers an 80 per cent increase in available magnetic field (from 0.93 Tesla to 1.75 Tesla), an 88 per cent increase in the force applied to accelerate the cone, increased sensitivity (92.7dB to 98.6dB), a lower resonant frequency, and an overall reduction in distortion by a factor of almost four—and all down to the nearly 7kg of copper wire used in place of the magnets. Add in an adjustable-output power supply, housed in a small separate enclosure and with six discrete steps from 1W to 75W, and you have the equivalent of 6dB in level adjustment, as well as an “overdrive” setting!
Comments
$180 K! Are you sh!tt!n me? You can by a 3 bedroom, 2 bath house in MANY cities for less than that these days! If you have this kind of money you aren't reading this online magazine. Besides, what's the 'diminishing returns' factor here? $180 K? Are you kidding me?!?!?!
products like these are made for bragging rights in the industry, and sold to millionaires or companies in the music/film industry. I doubt they had the 3 bedroom 2 bath nuclear family in mind while trying to market them.
$180 K! Are you sh!tt!n me? You can buy a 3 bedroom, 2 bath house in MANY cities for less than that these days! If you have this kind of money you aren't reading this online magazine. Besides, what's the 'diminishing returns' factor here? $180 K? Are you kidding me?!?!?!
I agree Budman. Anybody paying 180 grand for a pair of SPEAKERS needs to have their head examined. Are they 180 thousand times better than a pair of $1000 towers? I don't think so. It is just about the bragging rights.
These companies should get serious send these to china to build make them for 5 hundred to a thousand a pair and sell them for 10k I would buy a set for that if they sound as good as they suggest here. Problem is most people would not even pay 10k so they are looking for some fat cats that don't have time to compare speakers, and are willing to pay top dollar for the most expensive just to say they did.
GAWDAM! The politics of envy and denigration have made it to the High End.
If you don't like the speakers, you don't have to buy them. BUT... non-specific
criticism is just evidence of having an Attitude and expecting it to be considered as
a thoughtful Opinion.
we still get cabinets made of veneered / painted MDF! Hmmm.....
Where's the aerotech advances in that?
The price of a Ferrari, yet ... we still get cabinets made of veneered / painted MDF! Hmmm.....
Where's the aerotech advances in that?
... the equation that we mere mortals make does not apply. Yes, you can buy a house for that sort of money. But in some regions in Asia or Africa, people can buy a house for the amount you and I pay for our relatively modest listening setup. So what we consider decent price/performance will be considered as silly by people who earn less than 10% of what we make.
And that works the other way around too. People who are seriously loaded don't buy 180k houses. For people who can actually easily afford to buy these speakers, they may well be worth the money.
If price/performance were a fixed equation, we'd all be listening to music on an iPod with Sennheiser PX200 headphones. And drive a Tata Nano, for that matter.
Doedrums,are you shittin me? One thousand dollars for a pair of towers? What are the diminishing returns on that? I can get great towers at sears for $99.00. A re you shittin me?( Waiting for the next guy to undercut that)
I would agree $180,000 is an offense to decency and intelligence. However, "sellability" is not really the reason why these speakers have been made. Focal has a wide range of products, a many different price points; this is an excercize in discovering what technology the business will have to focus on moving forward, technologies -- as well as materials, construction processes, etc. -- which in the future will be applied to the lower end models which is where the market is at.
This practice isn't any different from many other businesses: for example, car racing (nascar, formula 1, rallies, etc.) is a discipline established to test solutions to be implemented in the standard models for mass production. These are speakers for showrooms, for CES, for magazine reviews. Yes, someone will buy these, my local audio store has them too; however, how many listen to these bad boys -- I wonder -- and end up purchasing a Focal loudspeaker in the 1-4K range?
You get what you pay for. I bought a pair of these speakers for the bedroom to make the compressed MP3s in my iPod sound better. And they did. Well worth it.
I wonder if they make a 7.1 surround system for about 2 million dollars. I really need those for the den.
It really scares me when I read outrage regarding prices of statement products like these. I don't think this or any other company is trying to talk Budman et al out of buying homes. These speakers are obviously a labor of love for the people involved, including the reviewer. For them, selling is not the point... it's the creative process of making the best. Mr. Gregory is doing a great service to all of the people with less than movie star incomes by showing us what is among the Holy Grail products out there & letting look into them a little further if we choose. Please don't speak for me or anyone else about something being too expensive to buy. People pay that kind of money all the time for things... like cars, vacations, weddings, wives and ex-wives. So Budman et al: if you need a raise, don't complain here. Find a new job.
"People pay that kind of money all the time for things... like cars, vacations, weddings, wives and ex-wives. So Budman et al: if you need a raise, don't complain here."
Well said. I have never understood the criticism of expensive audio gear when guys spend that kind of money on fishing boats, cars and everything else (yes, including ex-wives). Does Budman write to Car & Driver, "You can buy 6 Camry's for the price of that Ferrari!"
The magazine is The Absolute Sound - not Speakers for Middle Managers.
I'll double that
I will triple that. If one cannot enjoy the state-of-the art, then please by all means, go listen to a Bose.