| Products in this article: | Grande Utopia EM |

The third family of products to carry Focal’s flagship Utopia designation, this latest iteration represents not just an evolution of the technology and thinking behind these speakers, but a ground-up reassessment of its implementation. So while there are clear common factors that bind these new Utopia models to their predecessors (driver technology, build-quality, and materials), there isn’t a single element that hasn’t been modified or changed, wholly or in part.In fact, the developments are so comprehensive and their implications so far reaching that they are beyond the scope of a single review. Which is why we started by looking at the simplest speaker in the line, the two-way stand-mounted Diablo (reviewed in Issue 63 of Hi-Fi Plus, available on-line at avguide.com), a model that incorporates the advances made to the established beryllium tweeter and W Cone driver technologies, as well as touching on the sophisticated cabinet-mapping technique that has been applied to the design and construction of the enclosure.
The Grande Utopia EM embodies all those advances and adds a few twists to the mix that only become possible when development budgets and product pricing become truly elastic.
As such, this review constitutes Part II, a second installment of the story that started with the Diablo review, in which we noted significant advances made by Focal in the areas of driver performance and cabinet design. Refinements in the beryllium tweeter and the development of a new motor assembly, shaped to maximize venting and minimize reflections, have resulted in a lower resonant frequency, a 1.5dB increase in sensitivity, a 40 per cent reduction in distortion, increased thermal efficiency, greater dynamics, and reduced compression. Laser-cutting of the W sandwich cones used in the mid and bass drivers has improved sonic consistency and pair-matching, while the sophisticated new cabinet-mapping technology has allowed the creation of more efficient and rigid cabinet structures, shorn of the excess weight that stores mechanical energy, smearing musical information and anchoring the sound to the speakers, identifying them as its source.
The Grande Utopia EM matches those advances in midrange and high-frequency driver performance and enclosure design, with equivalent advances at low frequencies, in extending the Focus Time concept that governs the larger Utopia’s curved baffle arrangement and in crossover developments to actually deliver the increased musical potential. Confronted with a structure as strikingly different as the latest Grande, it’s easy to assume that it’s an exercise in ostentatious aesthetics (at the possible expense of performance)—especially when it’s this big and this red! (Well, the speaker comes in black and a subtle pale grey too—while anything, as they say, is possible.) What’s more, by presenting such a striking and well rounded form, the speakers make a statement, rather than trying to hide or slip into the background—never a possibility with something this large!
Besides the superb standard of finish, the key factor in this success is the Bauhaus discipline to the design, its form absolutely dictated by function. But its revolutionary appearance pales into insignificance against the mechanical and technological developments that lurk beneath its skin, so let’s examine each developmental aspect in turn.
Separate, stacked enclosure modules are nothing new in loudspeaker design, with many companies relying on the approach to fine-tune arrival times and driver placement relative to the listening position—often in conjunction with a complex set of tables or formulae to calculate proper placement. Indeed, the first and second series Utopias used both separate cabinets and a curved displacement of the drivers to arrange them relative to the listening position.
However, despite a fair degree of cleverness in the actual placement and alignment of the drivers there was no escaping the inherent compromise of a one-size-fits-all approach. With the latest Grande, the speaker with the longest baffle and most drivers, Focal was determined to overcome that limitation. The problem, clearly, was how to make the individual modules movable relative to the listening position; the solution is both mechanically impressive and wonderfully elegant.
Comments
$180 K! Are you sh!tt!n me? You can by a 3 bedroom, 2 bath house in MANY cities for less than that these days! If you have this kind of money you aren't reading this online magazine. Besides, what's the 'diminishing returns' factor here? $180 K? Are you kidding me?!?!?!
products like these are made for bragging rights in the industry, and sold to millionaires or companies in the music/film industry. I doubt they had the 3 bedroom 2 bath nuclear family in mind while trying to market them.
$180 K! Are you sh!tt!n me? You can buy a 3 bedroom, 2 bath house in MANY cities for less than that these days! If you have this kind of money you aren't reading this online magazine. Besides, what's the 'diminishing returns' factor here? $180 K? Are you kidding me?!?!?!
I agree Budman. Anybody paying 180 grand for a pair of SPEAKERS needs to have their head examined. Are they 180 thousand times better than a pair of $1000 towers? I don't think so. It is just about the bragging rights.
These companies should get serious send these to china to build make them for 5 hundred to a thousand a pair and sell them for 10k I would buy a set for that if they sound as good as they suggest here. Problem is most people would not even pay 10k so they are looking for some fat cats that don't have time to compare speakers, and are willing to pay top dollar for the most expensive just to say they did.
GAWDAM! The politics of envy and denigration have made it to the High End.
If you don't like the speakers, you don't have to buy them. BUT... non-specific
criticism is just evidence of having an Attitude and expecting it to be considered as
a thoughtful Opinion.
we still get cabinets made of veneered / painted MDF! Hmmm.....
Where's the aerotech advances in that?
The price of a Ferrari, yet ... we still get cabinets made of veneered / painted MDF! Hmmm.....
Where's the aerotech advances in that?
... the equation that we mere mortals make does not apply. Yes, you can buy a house for that sort of money. But in some regions in Asia or Africa, people can buy a house for the amount you and I pay for our relatively modest listening setup. So what we consider decent price/performance will be considered as silly by people who earn less than 10% of what we make.
And that works the other way around too. People who are seriously loaded don't buy 180k houses. For people who can actually easily afford to buy these speakers, they may well be worth the money.
If price/performance were a fixed equation, we'd all be listening to music on an iPod with Sennheiser PX200 headphones. And drive a Tata Nano, for that matter.
Doedrums,are you shittin me? One thousand dollars for a pair of towers? What are the diminishing returns on that? I can get great towers at sears for $99.00. A re you shittin me?( Waiting for the next guy to undercut that)
I would agree $180,000 is an offense to decency and intelligence. However, "sellability" is not really the reason why these speakers have been made. Focal has a wide range of products, a many different price points; this is an excercize in discovering what technology the business will have to focus on moving forward, technologies -- as well as materials, construction processes, etc. -- which in the future will be applied to the lower end models which is where the market is at.
This practice isn't any different from many other businesses: for example, car racing (nascar, formula 1, rallies, etc.) is a discipline established to test solutions to be implemented in the standard models for mass production. These are speakers for showrooms, for CES, for magazine reviews. Yes, someone will buy these, my local audio store has them too; however, how many listen to these bad boys -- I wonder -- and end up purchasing a Focal loudspeaker in the 1-4K range?
You get what you pay for. I bought a pair of these speakers for the bedroom to make the compressed MP3s in my iPod sound better. And they did. Well worth it.
I wonder if they make a 7.1 surround system for about 2 million dollars. I really need those for the den.
It really scares me when I read outrage regarding prices of statement products like these. I don't think this or any other company is trying to talk Budman et al out of buying homes. These speakers are obviously a labor of love for the people involved, including the reviewer. For them, selling is not the point... it's the creative process of making the best. Mr. Gregory is doing a great service to all of the people with less than movie star incomes by showing us what is among the Holy Grail products out there & letting look into them a little further if we choose. Please don't speak for me or anyone else about something being too expensive to buy. People pay that kind of money all the time for things... like cars, vacations, weddings, wives and ex-wives. So Budman et al: if you need a raise, don't complain here. Find a new job.
"People pay that kind of money all the time for things... like cars, vacations, weddings, wives and ex-wives. So Budman et al: if you need a raise, don't complain here."
Well said. I have never understood the criticism of expensive audio gear when guys spend that kind of money on fishing boats, cars and everything else (yes, including ex-wives). Does Budman write to Car & Driver, "You can buy 6 Camry's for the price of that Ferrari!"
The magazine is The Absolute Sound - not Speakers for Middle Managers.
I'll double that