Here is a riddle: What has sixteen separate, current-bearing, actively shielded “air strings” of copper-silver alloy, pure silver, pure gold, or (if you choose) a combination of gold and silver, twenty separate LEMO connectors and twenty separate LEMO receptacles, four DC-biasing/electromagnetic-power-conditioning junction boxes (called “Active Mini EM Cells”) into and out of which the LEMO-terminated “air strings” are routed, a separate “quantum tunneled” Mini Power Coupler power-supply that provides the DC current for the active shielding and EM power conditioning of all those cells and precious-metal “strings,” and costs $25,000 to $40,000 (not counting the TESLA PowerCell 10SE power conditioner into which the Mini Power Couplers are ideally plugged)?
Give up? The answer is one pair of Synergistic Research Galileo interconnects ($25,000) or one pair of Galileo speaker cables ($40,000).
I’ve seen expensive, complexly configured wires before, but the Galileo system is mind-boggling.

Before you start turning pages to get to the next review, let me assure you that Galileo is a uniquely interesting product and that its upside is considerable. It won’t take a golden ear to hear what it does (although it may take a golden goose to buy it). In a nutshell, the Galileo system is the highest-resolution, most transparent-to-sources cable and interconnect I or any of my listening panelists or anyone else who has heard it has yet auditioned. Regardless of what it is connected to, tube or transistor, analog source or digital source, Galileo will preserve the signature of the components it conjoins without adding a marked signature of its own. Here you will find none of the bleaching (or excessive sweetening) of tone color, the bungee-cord-like constraint or flagrant over-aggressiveness, the liquid darkness or silvery brightness and grain of other competitive, ultra-expensive, ultra-high-end cables. Galileo simply reflects what is in front of it with less editorialization and higher fidelity than any cable I’ve yet heard—and it does this primarily by lowering noise.
Galileo will remove fine layers of RFI and EMI you didn’t know were there—very-low-level distortion added by your AC power grid, by electromagnetic fields generated by the equipment you use, and by the skin effects and reactivity of your cables themselves—revealing fine levels of detail you also didn’t know were there on just about every source. Just as importantly, Galileo (in concert with the TESLA PowerCell 10 SE and TESLA power cords) will remove layers of noise you did know were there—clearly audible hum and RFI, which, in my case, have been driving me nuts for almost twenty years.
How many times have I complained in this mag about hum and RF on my record players and phonostages? Try as I might—and I have tried everything from ferrite beads to Faraday cages to dedicated circuits to true earth grounding with a rod—for two decades I’ve never been able to completely rid myself of these banes, which is why I call the neighborhood I live in “RFI Valley.”

I’d all but given up hope of a cure when Ted Denney arrived three months ago with his new wires. Once my system was hooked up with Galileo and a special (non-actively-shielded) Synergistic phono cable—and all components, including the turntable and phonostage, were fitted with actively shielded TESLA IEC power cords and plugged into a Synergistic TESLA PowerCell 10 SE—guess what? No RFI. No hum. For an analog hound like me, this was almost a miracle—and I wasn’t using unsalted matzoh before Mr. Denney came a’callin’. I’d almost forgotten how much very-low-level information and large-scale dynamic information gets slightly veiled, darkened, modulated, or blunted by RFI and power-line grunge. For this feat alone, the Galileo earns an exalted place in my Audio Hall of Fame. But, this feat ain’t alone.
However, before I get into the other wonders Galileo hath wrought, let’s talk a bit about how it works, because how it works is, uh, different.
The objective of the Galileo project, which cost Synergistic several years and many hundreds of thousands of dollars to perfect, was, in fact, to do precisely what Galileo actually and audibly does—lower noise and increase resolution and transparency. Some of this was accomplished by building on technologies pioneered in Synergistic’s previous cables and interconnects and some of it was entirely new to the Galileo system. Of the legacy technologies, the most important are active shielding and what Denny et al. call “quantum tunneling” (apparently, and rather perplexingly, after the quantum mechanical phenomenon where a particle tunnels through a barrier that it classically cannot surmount because its total mechanical energy is lower than the potential energy of the barrier).
Comments
Hello Jonathan;
All I can say is wow! Cables/Interconnects have been viewed as significant, but not equivalent in cost in regards to amplifying equipment.
However, here, in this case, one must give pause to consider just how important and significant ... and equivalent cables and interconnects are with respect to the associated amplification equipment.
This is a game changer to note with greater clarity the differences and perhaps discerning the "why" we prefer the sound or sounds from various amplification equipment in our "reference" or "listening" chain.
I did read TAS's most recent mag where you have reviewed the Tara Labs Gold.
Before I consider dropping serious coin on the Galileos (which translates to 2 speaker pairs and 4 interconnect pairs ... wow), could you please comment on the contrasts or comparisons between the Galileo and Golds?
Thanks greatly, and keep expressing your valued perceptions and experiences.
GL
Hi Jon,
all I can say is "My God!"
Have I done something wrong? I do neither have RFI nor hum in my system.
I wonder how any manufacturer of High-End equipment could ever build marvelous things without having these cables.
You said: "the Galileo earns an exalted place in my Audio Hall of Fame".
Well let me add: "Mr. Denney should receive the Nobel Prize for his work on "Quantum Tunneling"!
But maybe he's working on the "Fermi Cables" right now based on "The Theory Of Everything" or "Great Unified Theory".
The crux on the matter is that these cables will then cost a hundred kilobucks.
Keep on with your lyrics!
SYSOPR
Sys,
I say I've been plagued by RFI and EMI on my phono sources in my current home (and in the one preceding it, which was in the same neighborhood) for better than TWENTY YEARS, that I have tried every remedy known to man to rid myself of these problems (including a wide wide variety of different cables and interconnects), that Denney came along with Galileo and suddenly no EMI and RFI--zero, nada, niente. YOU say you also have zero RFI and EMI where you live (preseumaby using different cables and interconnects), therefore, your situation and my situation are equivalent and my conclusion that Denney's wires and power cords made a remarkable difference in the reduction of certain obvious kinds of noise is, ipso facto, fallacious. Marvelous, simply marvelous bit of reasoning.
I will grant--and in fact DID GRANT IN NO UNCERTAIN TERMS--that Denney uses silly, hyperbolic terms to describe some of his technical processes. That is regrettable, and I wish he didn't, as I also said in print. This is the very sort of thing that makes cable manufacturers look like snake-oil salesmen. HOWEVER, I also said in no uncertain terms that the sonic effects that these sometimes sillily named processes have on the sound are PRECISELY AS DENNY AND CO. DESCRIBE THEM. While Denney should spend some time in his room for naming things the way he has, he deserves credit for the substantially improved neutrality, transparency, reduction in noise, and increase in resolution that Galileo affects, however achieved, which is exactly what I said in the review.
As for the cost of Galielo...I don't know how I could have been clearer. The stuff is priced lifetimes beyond my means. You would have to be very very very rich to afford it--and half-nuts to give yourself permission to buy it. HOWEVER, if you are made of money and simply mad about hi-fi, then, IMO, you cannot buy a better cable and interconnect than these things, because they do have the sonic effects that Denney and Co. claim they have and are lower in noise/higher in resolution than every other cable I've yet tested (and I've heard and tested a few).
JV
Hello Jon,
your answer was more clear than your statements in the review. Thanx for that.
Please don't let us discuss whether you or I have more or less listening experience.
I'm pretty sure, as you are, that even the least experienced person can hear what's better or worse.
I mean it by word, I'm not speaking of "I like this or that more"!
Look, I would bet, that if an installation is done with cables all from one manufacturer it will be better in over ninety percent than any mixture.
I assume each and every manufacturer wouldn't deny this.
As I told you in another blog before, I hate mixtures of different materials not only brands.
So I will not be surprised if an installation completely done with SR cables will be superior to one with mixed-up cables.
And that is true for SR or Transparent or MIT or Cardas or Nordost or Purist and XLO to name a few.
BTW - my favourite is not among these, but that does not matter.
Nevertheless, thank you once again for your clarification.
Greetings
SYSOPR