Technical highlights of the Stax SR-009

• Diaphragm: The SR-009 features a diaphragm less than 2 microns thick that is made from what Stax calls a “High Polymer Ultra-Thin Film” material called “Super Engineering Plastics”). According to Stax, this is a “much thinner material than conventional engineered plastics.” Stax promises the new diaphragm results, “in a vast dynamic range, excellent tone quality and frequency characteristics from low to super-high (frequencies)!”
• Electrodes: The SR-009 features all-new MLER electrodes (the acronym stands for Multi-Layer ElectRodes,” that are made through a new process that uses both “ultra-precision photo etch” and “high tech heat diffusion” techniques to join three layers of material to form the thin, flat electrode panels. Specifically, Stax sought to balance three performance variables—the thinness of the electrode, the stiffness of the electrode, and the non-resonant qualities of the electrode—with an eye toward maximizing all three at once. At least one authorized Stax dealer claims that the manufacturing process for SR-009 electrodes is three times more difficult to implement, and takes six times longer to execute, than comparable processes for other Stax electrostatic headphones.
• Enclosures: The SR-009 is as open-back design, and features extremely rigid driver housings “precision machined from lightweight aluminum” (giving new meaning to the term, “carved from billet.”).
• Cables: The distinctive signal/bias voltage cable for the SR-009 is made from “silver plated, high purity copper wire 99.9999%.”
• Headband: The SR-009 headband uses a, “newly designed 10-click slider mechanism for optimal wear and comfort.” The same mechanism is also used on the STAX SR-507 Lambda Open-Back Headphones.
• Ear pads: The SR-009 features thick, comfortable, asymmetrical (as in, thicker toward the rear and thinner toward the front) ear pads covered in “hand crafted Lamb leather.”
• The Box: Even the box the SR-009 comes in is special; it’s a padded case made of paulownia wood, whose properties are said to be optimal for “long-term preservations of the product.” Stax includes a special insert in the SR-009 shipping carton to explain that that pawlonia wood is lightweight, heat resistant, insect proof, and offers “moderate cushioning properties.” Moreover, the wood also helps regulate humidity to help keep the ‘phones from becoming overly damp while in storage.

Let me come right out and say it: the Stax SR-009 is the most accurate, neutrally balanced, responsive, nuanced, and detailed audio transducer I’ve heard. It is also—unlike some electrostatic headphones I’ve tried—capable of very robust dynamics and powerful (though ultra-clean) low bass (areas where some electrostats seem to run out of steam earlier than would be desirable). In short, the SR-009 is the best headphone I’ve yet heard.
With this said, however, let’s also note that today’s best dynamic driver-equipped and planar magnetic headphones offer performance that, while not entirely on a par with the SR-009, falls not terribly far behind, while selling for about 60% – 80% less that the Stax ‘phones do. My point is the there is true greatness in the SR-009 design, but greatness that comes at quite a dear price. Still, there are (at least) two ways to look at the issue of pricing. One might be to say, “$5250 is just too much to spend for any headphone; I can get close enough to the sonic mountaintop for a fraction of the SR-009’s price,” which is true. However, another way to look at the situation might be to ask, “In what other class of luxury goods—be it wristwatches, cameras, or high-end audio gear—can you get the very best there is for as little as the SR-009’s cost?” Depending on your frame of reference, then, the SR-009 could be considered an unattainable luxury, or (dare I say it?) a bit of a bargain as best-you-can-get material objects go.
What is the “sonic character” of the SR-009? Well, that’s a tough question to answer because these ‘phones are so neutral and so faithful to the sources that drive them, that they really don’t seem to have a signature sound of their own, though certain sonic common denominators do always seem to be present. For instance, no matter what ancillary components you use, you can count on the SR-009s to sound very accurately balanced, extended on both ends of the audio spectrum, consistently fast, extraordinarily transparent, and capable of delivering lavish amounts of detail (provided the rest of your system is up to the task). But the tricky part is that the underlying sonic “persona” of the SR-009 can and does shift in both subtle and profound ways as you connect these headphones to different amplifiers and source components.
Comments
So how do you account for this improvement that warrants a doubling of the price: thinner diaphragms and stiffer stators? I doubt that explains it all. What about the amplifier? Can Stax explain what the performance upgrades are, and how they warrant a doubling of the price?
Hi Gadgety:
You pose a fair question. I'll tell what I know based on my investigations thus far.
1) The differences are not solely attributable to the amp, good though the Woo Audio WES is. I know this because I have heard a pair of Stax SR-007 MkIIs alongside the SR-009s with both headphones driven by the very same WES amp. I found there was quite a big performance gap between the SR-007 MkII and the SR-009, and since the same amp was driving both 'phones at the same time, I have to think the difference was attributable to the superior design/execution of the SR-009.
2) I'm not sure whether you will find Stax's information on the SR-009 compelling or not, but to see the company's own explanation of the improvements made in the SR-009, follow this link: http://staxusa.com/Earspeaker/STAX-SR-009.html
3) Do the improvements warrant a doubling in price? Only you can answer that one.
As I mentioned in this review, today's best dynamic and planar magnetic 'phones can get you fairly close to the performance of the SR-009 for much less money (think of prices in the $1k - $2k range versus $5250 for the Stax). Still, in high-end audio (and the SR-009 is unquestionably at the high end of the high end), the final 5% or so of performance has traditionally been the hardest to achieve and also the most expensive. This is a roundabout way of saying that the value proposition of the SR-009 (and of the high performance amp it will require) is very much in the ear (and wallet) of the beholder.
Personally, I can't afford the SR-009 or the amp I would need to match with it. So, I content myself (quite happily) with a set of planar magnetic 'phones and a good but not painfully expensive amp. But that doesn't stop me from admiring what Stax and Woo have achieved, or from dreaming that one day I'll perhaps figure out a way...
Best, Chris Martens
Chris Martens
Editor, Avguide.com/Playback/The Perfect Vision
Chris, you mention what you feel to be a slight upper mid-range rise. In my experience these phones require careful matching of amps and/or sources for them to sound natural in the treble, at least if your system is really open up there. In my case it helped to substitute 6FQ7s for 2 of the 6DJ8s in my DIY tube amp. Quite a lot of people have commented that the 009s sound bright with different amps; of course, there is considerable variation in the perception of highs via headphones due to outer ear differences (not to mention HF hearing loss!). Tyll Hertsen's measurements (at Inner Fidelity) show a bump of about 3 dB around 1K. They also show that the bass below about 50 Hz is down 3-4 dB compared to the upper bass/mids. I believe I hear this and that it's not caused by the source or amp or cables; did you not hear it with the Woo? In any case these are wonderful phones, for all the reasons you mention.
Tony Reif
Hi tonereef,
You do raise a good point. The SR-009's are VERY sensitive to tubes or to any other elements of the system. The Stax 'phones can and do expose even the smallest system changes or tuning adjustments.
I experienced no brightness problems at all when the SR-009 was used with the Head Amp Blue Hawaii SE and the pre-production prototype of the Cavalli Liquid Lightning, and only occasional trace amounts of upper midrange brightness (on some but not most recordings) through the Woo WES. The tradeoff, however, was that the Woo--as configured with Sophia driver tubes and Shuguang 50 Years Treasures output tubes--was arguably the most transparent/open-sounding of the three amps. According to Jack Wu, you can temper those trace bits of midrange forwardness observed in the WES either by making a different tube choice or by ordering up the WES with the extra-cost V-CAP options that Woo offers.
In my experience, perceived bass output levels varied somewhat with different amps, too. I would say that in general terms the extreme low end of the SR-009 may not be **quite** as full-bodied as that of a properly driven Audeze LCD-3 or LCD-2, Rev.2, nor as rock solid as the bottom end of an also properly driven HiFiMAN HE-6. But with that said, I would add that the SR-009's low frequency balance often tends to seem more consistent with the sound of live music (most of the time, at any rate), and that its pitch definition and transient speed are spectacularly good. All in all, I could live happily with the SR-009's bass performance; it certainly didn't seem "bass shy" to me, and I'm normally quite sensitive to (or even finicky about) such things.
Chris Martens
Editor, Avguide.com/Playback/The Perfect Vision
Hi Chris,
Would be very interesting to read a comparison piece between the 009s and the Audez'e LCD-3s. Any news on whether you guys have/are going to have a pair of the new Audez'e flagships in soon?
Best Regards
Speakers: B and W 802 Diamonds, Bose Lifestyle 35, Audioengine AP4 Bamboo
Headphones: Audeze LCD-3, LCD-2, Beyerdynamic T5p, dt880, AKG K701, Ultrasone HFI-780
IEMs/Earbuds: Westone 4, Mons
Hi dyl1dyl:
A review of the Audeze LCD-3 will be coming soon in Playback.
Best,
Chris Martens
Chris Martens
Editor, Avguide.com/Playback/The Perfect Vision
Chris: When I purchased the WES, Jack Wu suggested the ultimate tube upgrades and internal parts upgrades, I purchased both. Some time later, when the SR 009 was released, I purchased those as well. Before I come off sounding like a "big spender," let me mention that as a teenager in the 1950s I was designing and building my own audio equipment, and into the 1960s building "top rank" amp and preamp kits. A successful legal career enabled me to reach the ultimate audio heights in the 1980s. In the early 1990s, as empty nesters, my wife and I moved into a new townhouse condo community. Approaching retirement, I sold much of my system and moved into the world of earspeakers, at a small fraction of the cost of my ultimate system. (Stax amps and earspeakers and a fine CD player)
I must assume that your review process could not extend over the time frame of my listening experience (since my purchase of the WES), so I want to let you know about some long term developments.
When I purchased the SR 009s, Jack suggested that I bring in WES to upgrade the original chokes. (I have no idea what I am talking about)
Immediately I could hear a major improvement. At somewhere between the 200-300 hours of listening experience my audio "troops" and I felt that we had reached the full and final break-in... nirvana! Then, quite unexpectedly, somewhere around 700-800 hours or so, there was a further step into reality. Understand that we had already concluded that "nirvana are us!" But there arrived further clarity... not that we were experiencing any congestion on massed strings, etc., but even more transparancy appeared! On well recorded material, from FIM CDs to hi-res downloads, "YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY THERE"!
Live concerts rarely drive us to greater listening joy except for the participation experience.
ADR
I have listened to the Eagles track so many times and never got what you heard..Until now! Though I am hearing it through my FAD Piano Forte IX's. That is quite a revelation! Just to be sure I then plugged in my LCD2's balanced and it was not there!
Chris,
Just received my SR009's - and you are correct in your conclusion - they are essentially transparent, transmitting the audio characteristics of the driving chain, and thus potentially frustrating if the drivers are not as transparent as others.
Mind you I was initially startled listening to them to an FM signal during which I heard the musicians sliding their fingers along the frets - heads-up sort of reaction. This information via a standard (low) FM signal ??
That said I'm still running mine in via the Stax SRM600 but bear in mind that this amplifier is being driven by a Qol unit via Accuphase and Bryston sources, so while not Wu's, the driver's are not shabby under most circumstances.
Immediate impressions (Listening to the Decca recording of Ute Lemper) is that this is a very transparent transducer. Switching the Qol in and out has dramatic effects to the soundstage and timbre as well.
Equipment used for this opinion:
1. Computer files produced from DDPoweramp and Audiogate software.
2. Bryston BDP-1
3. Accuphase C2110 preamp with DAC30 option
4. Qol Signal enhancing unit
5. Stax SRM-600
6. Stax SR009 headphones.
7. HP Envy all in one PC, Windows 8, Audiogate Software 4.3 via Accuphase DAC30 SP/DIF USB.
Louis Hissink
I now have the set for almost 1 month. And there was not a single moment, where I have regretted the purchase. For the most part of the last 10 years, I had a Stax SignatureI headphone set with a SRM 006tII energizer. But somewhere along the line, I decided to buy a better headphone set, opted for the SR 009 headphone with the SRM 007tII energizer and bought them. Frankly, when I listened to the new set for the first time, I didn't expect the improvement in quality to be that big. While I always enjoyed the Signature set, the SR 009 really makes a difference in terms of clarity, reproduction of cymbals and basses, etc. And I don't even have a stellar audio system. My Cambridge Audio CD Player 851C is just fine along with some solid main plugs, XLR- and Cinch cables.
In that regard, if you can't afford to be all your stereo components high end, you can make concessions and still be happy. Some 20 years ago, a dealer told me to spent the same amount for player (phone, cassette, CD, tuner), and amplifier combined for the speaker set (in my case the Stax set). I always kept that in mind and in my opinion, he was right.
At last I would like to add, that in my opinion, the SR 009 is worth the 5.000 € you have to spent (in germany where I live).
It isn't easy to quantify, whether money for an item is well spent or not or is worth the amount. In my opinion it depends, what you expect from the item to be bought. When it comes to listened to music and enjoying life, the SR 009 is a good choice.