Quad 9L Active Desktop Loudspeaker (Playback 30)

Desktop Sound That Satisfies

I first saw a working prototype of the Quad 9L Active desktop loudspeaker more than a year ago (at CES 2009), and thought from the outset that it was a cleverly conceived product that might make a great review subject for Playback. Now, more than a year after that first glimpse, the 9L Active has been tweaked, revised and refined en route to final production, yet without losing any of the cool features that made it seem like such a good idea in the first place.

What exactly are those features? Well, for starters, the 9L Active package, which sells for $800, includes two very compact, self-powered bookshelf speakers that leverage drive unit technology from Quad’s critically acclaimed L-series loudspeakers. Further, the 9L Active package is set up to support three inputs: digital audio via a USB port (yes, the 9L Active features its own built-in USB DAC), plus analog audio via either a front-panel mounted stereo mini-jack or a rear panel-mounted stereo pair of RCA jacks. Finally, the system is supplied with an assortment of necessary hook-up cables, plus a small, easy-to-use remote control unit. In a nutshell, then, the 9L Active system stands as a very high quality, plug-and-play, desktop-audio-in-a-box package, where all you need to add is a PC, a personal digital music player/disc player or a preamp (or any combination of these).

But the 9L Active system is also quite different from any of Quad’s earlier self-powered bookshelf speakers. Whereas Quad’s 11L and 12L Studio Active self-powered speakers were voiced primarily for use as true monitoring speakers, the 9L Active system is in every way—including speaker voicing—geared specifically for desktop use (a design choice we’ll comment on in depth in the SONIC CHARACTER section of this review, below).

In practice, this means the 9L Active system aims to provide a bigger, richer and thus more satisfying sound than most desktop rigs, yet while preserving many of the core sonic qualities that have made Quad’s higher-end speaker systems famous. Does it succeed? That’s a key question we will answer in this review. 

 

OVERVIEW

Consider this self-powered desktop speaker if: you seek a desktop audio system that offers many of the sonic attributes of higher-end speaker systems (excellent detail, focus and soundstaging, with beautiful integration between drivers), yet that deliberately produces a warmer, richer, more full-bodied and more evocative sound than most desktop systems can. While some purists might consider the 9L Active’s “euphonic” voicing touches to be colorations (which, in a sense, they are), the fact is that the system manages to convey more of the feel of listening to a full-sized hifi system than to a small and potentially underwhelming and anemic-sounding traditional desktop system. At $800, the 9L Active system is certainly not cheap, yet we think it’s a bargain given the results you achieve.

Look further if: you want a self-powered speaker system to use for professional monitoring purposes or as a whole-room audio system. While the 9L Active certainly could be used for either of those applications, Quad’s 11L or 12L Studio Active models would frankly be a better fit, though at significantly higher costs. But for simply relaxing and enjoying music at your desktop, the 9L Active system is tough to beat.  

Ratings (relative to comparably-priced self-powered speakers)

  • Transparency and Focus: 9.5
  • Imaging and Soundstaging: 9.5
  • Tonal Balance: 8 (see specific notes under SONIC CHARACTER explaining the 9L Active’s “desktop friendly” voicing)
  • Dynamics: 8.5
  • Bass Extension: 9
  • Bass Pitch Definition: 8.5
  • Bass Dynamics: 8.5
  • Value: 9

 

Comments

D. Liguori (not verified) -- Thu, 04/22/2010 - 12:32

Is this the British Quad, maker of the ESL's? Is Peter Walker rolling in his grave?

Chris Martens -- Fri, 04/23/2010 - 16:40

Hello D. Liquori,

Yes, this is indeed the British Quad of ESL fame.

I like to think that Peter Walker would be pleased to know his ESLs continue to be regarded (quite rightly, in my view) as worthy benchmark products, and I think he would approve of the idea of his company trying to build lower cost speakers that capture at least some of the ESL's magic.

Chris Martens
Editor, Avguide.com/Playback/The Perfect Vision 

Saquib (not verified) -- Fri, 04/23/2010 - 22:20

Can anyone tell me if it works with the latest Macbook Pro laptops?

Tom Martin -- Sat, 04/24/2010 - 08:40

It should. The Quads have USB inputs, and the Macbooks have USB.

CEO and Editorial Director, Nextscreen LLC

John Geisen (not verified) -- Wed, 05/05/2010 - 20:56

First, let me say I'm a dealer for Quad. To answer your question, I have a MacBook Pro and just set up the 9L's on my system and it works fine; either using Apples headphone output or USB output. I'm really enjoying this setup.

John Geisen

paulseydor (not verified) -- Mon, 05/31/2010 - 15:39

John: I have hooked a pair of 9Ls to my desktop MacPro Tower, but there is, unless I'm missing something, no USB output here, only an analogue output via minijacks or an Toslink output. (Is there such a thing as toslink to USB convertor cable?) The speakers are quite good, a substantial advance over any other specifically desktop speakers I've heard. I second Chris Martens's review, especially his observations with respect to tonal balance.

RCW (not verified) -- Sat, 04/24/2010 - 13:34

800 dollars for computer speakers?

Frank D (not verified) -- Wed, 05/12/2010 - 18:07

How does it compare to the NHT M00? Thank you.

Ubuddy (not verified) -- Fri, 05/21/2010 - 21:26

I will begin to save up for these NOW!
I have been shopping for a quality computer area loudspeaker system for quite a while.
The inclusion of a good dac 6O watts per and the Quad name make it a lock for me.
Hopefully i will get to preview a set somewhere.

Ubuddy (not verified) -- Fri, 05/21/2010 - 21:26

I will begin to save up for these NOW!
I have been shopping for a quality computer area loudspeaker system for quite a while.
The inclusion of a good dac 6O watts per and the Quad name make it a lock for me.
Hopefully i will get to preview a set somewhere.

Scrotie (not verified) -- Tue, 06/01/2010 - 01:31

"Euphonic" character? Does that mean "Like a tuba that you play while riding a horse"?!

Chris Martens -- Tue, 05/31/2011 - 09:27

Scrotie:

The word "euphonic" is the adjective form of the word "euphony," which means, according to at least one dictionary definition, "agreeableness of sound; pleasing effect to the ear."

In an audiophile sense, the word euphonic implies a sound that may not exhibit strict textbook neutrality or accuracy, but that deviates from neutrality in ways that are pleasing to the ears of many listeners. This is the sense in which I used the word.

Fair enough?

Best, Chris Martens

Chris Martens
Editor, Avguide.com/Playback/The Perfect Vision 

tonyE -- Sun, 07/25/2010 - 11:29

OK.... what is the USB BIT RATE?

Does it support 24/96? 24/192? Or plain Red Book?

So... please, whenever you specify a USB interface:

(1) What are the supported bit widths and bit rates?
(2) Is it USB 1.1 or USB 2.0?
(3) Does it require drivers? If so, are they provided?

I think it's time that audio writers start to figure out how a personal computer works.... I think we have too many that use Macs and figure it's all done for them. Every time I read one of these reviews I cringe about the lack of interface specifications, to the point where the reviews become useless. You can not believe how many times I've had to email the manufacturer for details -Until very recently most devices were USB 1.1 and 16/44.1K. Which won't do diddly when your audio files are in 24/96 already.

And, yeah, btw, I do have a pair of Quad 12L actives, plus two pairs of Acoustic Energy AE1s.... and they are hooked up to PC via M-Audio devices.

IMHO, a used Quad 12L Active and an M-Audio Transit (for the computer novice) make a lot of more sense and is a lot more versatile.

All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1999 - 2011 NextScreen. All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.