In Issue 202 I concluded my review of the Amarra software program with, “If you want to hear how good a quality Mac-based system can really sound, you have to use Amarra. In the end, it’s that simple.” Time and the latest version of Channel D’s Pure Music software may make me eat those words. Priced at only $129, Pure Music promises to improve not only iTunes’ sonics, but also adds high-resolution capabilities along with a host of other advanced sonic and ergonomic features.
Pure Music is such a powerful program that reading its “User Guide” is a must. I daresay that you will be reading this informative tome more than once. I recommend keeping Pure Music’s User Guide PDF open on your desktop for the first week or so of operation, especially during initial setup. While nothing in Pure Music’s preference panels is completely inscrutable, without the User Guide anyone not familiar with Pure Music’s many options could screw up its settings in a myriad of ways. Don’t say I didn’t warn you.
Like Amarra, Pure Music’s principal function is to bypass iTunes’ signal processing and substitute a more direct and powerful 64-bit processing program. In addition Pure Music offers automatic rate-switching from 44.1/16 all the way up to 192/24, gapless playback of files that have been designated as gapless files, memory play, real-time high-resolution upsampling of CD tracks, a 64-bit internal signal path, dithered volume control, phase inversion, a subwoofer crossover, multichannel support, support for audio processing plug-ins, Core Audio HOG mode playback, high-resolution audio streaming, precision signal metering, reverse play, and more. Some of these features, such as HOG mode and memory play may sound like gibberish to the uninitiated, but these two features alone make Pure Music capable of elevating even a lowly Mac Mini into a formable music delivery device.

I could easily fill many pages with a detailed description of individual preference panes and the various options these panes offer, but you can download the User Guide along with a demo version from Channel D’s Web site.The free demo offers fifteen days of full-featured usage, and I daresay that once you’ve used Pure Music going back to ordinary ol’ iTunes will be tough, unless you’re listening through a Dixie cup and a string.
Although a novice user, the sort of person who feels intimidated by anything labeled “preferences,” can simply download and run Pure Music, to hear its full potential does require optimizing it for your particular system’s capabilities. But even when it is used “plain vanilla” without any system optimization, I could hear differences between iTunes and Pure Music.
Among Pure Music’s “must use” features is memory play. This loads your music file’s stream into an adjustable RAM buffer before it’s sent to your rendering device or DAC. It usually takes a few seconds for the buffer to fill and music to begin playing, but you can select a “Hybrid buffer” setting which will play the first couple of seconds of a track without buffering while the data is loaded into the buffer and then automatically switches to buffered mode once the buffer is filled.
Pure Music’s upsampling capabilities allow it to turn a 44.1/16-bit file into a higher-res file. Among the options are “power of two” upsampling. According to Pure Music’s User Guide, “this operation is more efficient than factored upsampling, and in the case of Red Book CD, 88.2kHz is, all things considered, a better target than 96kHz.” If your DAC will support it, a Red Book CD can be upsampled all the way to 192kHz. With the Weiss DAC 202 I was able to set up Pure Music so it upsampled 44.1/16 files to 192/24 before sending them to the DAC.
Another unique feature of Pure Music is the HOG mode. According to the user guide, “this option reserves the audio device for Pure Music’s exclusive use while Pure Music is running. To use this feature, the audio device selected in Audio MIDI Setup should be set to a different device than the one used by Pure Music, to allow iTunes to fully access an audio device if necessary. Accordingly, by default, HOG Mode cannot be used for the audio device selected in Audio MIDI Setup.” This feature is best used on a dedicated music system. On a full-service computer it means that any time you want to use any program that requires an audio stream it will have to go to an alternative audio device, such as your internal speakers or a second DAC.
My final preferred HOG setup was pretty clever, if I do say so myself: I used the Weiss DAC 202 in FireWire mode for my Pure Music feed and the Empirical Audio Off-Ramp 3 for all other audio tasks. To change from Pure Music to other audio sources I only needed to select the DAC 202’s RCA/SPDIF input.
Comments
The next version is supposed to have FLAC support on a MAC
The latest version of Amarra has FLAC support via direct play or conversion to AIFF. Amarra 2.1.1 even has batch processing for FLAC files.
Steven Stone
Contributor to The Absolute Sound, EnjoytheMusic.com, Vintage Guitar Magazine, and other fine publications
From the company website,
"Some new features coming soon (Q4 2010) (FREE update) include:
Built-in multi-band parametric EQ
Native FLAC support
Native device integer support
Internet Radio (iTunes streams)
Pure Vinyl's™ High Quality File Sample Rate Converter (upsample from CD format to files, or also downsample high-resolution audio to 96, 88.2 or 44.1 kHz / 16, 24, or 32 bit files)"
They obviously didn't make Q4 2010, but native flac support is coming in the next version
Firedog,
Did you try the Hi rez downloads of Band on the Run? are they any good? any other Hi-Rez downloads you recommend? Some titles on the download sites claim its good but doesn't turn out to be that great.
Sam-
Off topic, but in short, yes. Tried both versions. Liked the unlimited better. Best version of the album I've heard.
Thanks for that info....Don't worry too much about off topic. This thread is not catching fire by posters......and no need for too hard and fast rules. Happy Listening!
Steven and others would you mind commenting on hardware? I'm thinking about Squeezebox, or a Mac Mini > USB DAC solution, with the Mac running Amarra or Pure Music. Of course I could end up with an external DAC with the Squeezebox too, and don't want to get bogged down on the DAC part of it.
What do you think of a Mac Mini, run via Apple Remote (with no monitor on the stereo shelf) as a server? Any other Mac-based suggestions? I like the idea of the 'cleanness' of the Mac Mini sitting on the shelf without a monitor :)
Both the Squeezebox or the mini are good choices, but different.
If you want wireless from a computer in another part of your home the Squeezebox is the way to go, but if you want to have the whole system in the same room as your stereo the mini run via apple remote or via your iPod Touch, iPhone, or iPad (which is very slick) might be a better option. Although the Squeezebox touch is less expensive, it will require a computer to feed it, so in the end the two methodologies may end up being similarly priced.
I think the mini option has more horsepower and better high rez capabilities. With the right USB driver you can do 192/24 (such as with the Wyred4Sound DAC-2).
Steven Stone
Contributor to The Absolute Sound, EnjoytheMusic.com, Vintage Guitar Magazine, and other fine publications
Barry Diament has reported that the output of iTunes is bit perfect. (He used his own high-res recordings for the test.) Not trying to start a debate, but just wondering: How can Pure Music sound clearly better than iTunes if the iTunes output to the DAC is bit perfect to begin with? The automatic bit/rate switching and FLAC playback are enough to make me interested in buying the Pure Music app, but if it sounds different than the regular iTunes output, I'm worried that it's not "pure," so to speak.
I suspect that there's more to digital music file reproduction than "bit-perfect" output.
I have heard differences, as have many others both in the pro and audiophile side between iTunes and these other software playback packages. Are we all suffering from sonic hallucinations? I don't think so.
Steven Stone
Contributor to The Absolute Sound, EnjoytheMusic.com, Vintage Guitar Magazine, and other fine publications
Thanks, Steven. Actually, my worry is that you and others are *not* hallucinating. If there's an audible difference between Pure Music and iTunes, then the most likely explanation is that Pure Music is altering the original, perhaps euphonically.
I read your review on this very inexpensive music server and downloaded the demo from Pure Music.
In my initial listening tests, I found PM (compared to iTunes) to be anemic with the volume severely damped, attack and decay of drums and cymbals shortened and the sound stage all but removed. My speakers were no longer transparent and the instrumentation of music, was muted and confined to either the left or right channels.
I then tried the Amarra demo as well, with the same result and thus pointing the problem away from the software.
I called Pure Music and spoke to them to find out what could be wrong.
They were extremely helpful.
After hearing the audible differences over the phone, between iTunes and PM, their tech accessed my computer with a VNC program to check everything. It took about 20 minutes of going through the settings, before he realized (and I remembered) that I had used the iTunes equalizer "Acoustic" preset on all of my stored music along with a gain adjustment set to 70%.
(I'm not fond of computer music, but I do listen to an iPod when I'm out and about and I have found that the iTunes"Acoustic" preset opened up every genre of music, revealing the articulation the instruments and creating a sound stage. Even on my stereo system, it's close to CD sonic quality, but still falls a bit short.)
At this point, the tech tried adjusting the PM AUgraphic EQ and got the playback similar to the sound quality of the iTunes Acoustic" preset.. The tech suggested adjusting the AUDynamics processor. Not being a sound engineer and unfamiliar with the effect and use of "expansion ratio" "attack time" adjustments etc., I did the best I could to reproduce the quality of my iTunes preset, but never quite got it there.
As I mentioned to the PM tech, I thought that Pure Music was supposed to be a sizable improvement in sonics over iTunes and not an attempt to match it (which is what he and I were trying to do together).
Because of it's audio plugins, I think that one could do a lot with Pure Music and get more out of it than I can, but, that person would have to have a good understanding of what each of the settings in the 17 different audio plugins do, and the impact of that on the other plugin adjustments, along with what bus to put that plugin on, etc.
I'm not a sound engineer and I don't have the time to study up on all of these aspects of playback in order to take the Pure Music playback beyond what iTunes is doing for me now.
Perhaps you, or someone else has a suggestion or advice on the Pure Music plugin set up that would be easy to grasp and would help me achieve the level of sonics in computer playback that you are writing about?
Do you want to better or do you want to be good?
I had in mind to try this and downloaded the demo version and, motivated by just the title of this report, I just installed it. For my first ever comment I must say thanks for the birthday gift Mr. Stone, based on the date of this piece. The improvement in the all important to me area of "authenticity" is startling. It's on the level of dynamic v. electrostatic. Having assembled an otherwise pretty revealing system, I've been preoccupied with improving my source. While in Heaven, I must say that the Linn religion had it right in terms of the hierarchy of impact in the audio chain. Once there is a sufficiently transparent system it makes sense. I won't say it's the last step because I said it more than once, but it may be the first level of the last step...however long it lasts. I will promptly get the regular version and when I decide to convert my vinyl, I'll look them up for their kit. So, I better read the report now.
I will test Pure Music Software , it very very perfect . I like this .Thank you
Toshiko