PLAYBACK: Apple In-Ear Headphones

A High-Performance Entry from the iPod’s Inventor

 

 

Over time, Playback has reviewed over twenty models of in-ear headphones and headsets and—judging by inbound emails and phone calls—it’s a product category that holds enduring interest for our readers. Every now and again, though, we get review requests for specific models of earphones that readers feel are worthy but that have not yet appeared in our pages. One such product that has been mentioned several reader emails is a model from a firm you might not necessarily think of when shopping for high-performance headphones: namely, Apple (as in “the guys who built your iPod”). Now I realize that there is a common misconception that Apple builds only those inexpensive and relatively low-performance earbuds that come as standard accessories with all iPods and iPhones. But a not-so-well-known fact is that Apple offers a much higher performance solution, called simply the Apple In-Ear Headphones, for those willing to invest $79 in superior sound quality.

Interestingly, Apple’s marketing tagline for the product reads, “Turns out you haven’t heard everything”—a tacit admission that stock iPod/iPhone earbuds leave much to be desired. Happily, Apple’s In-Ear Headphones are designed to cater to audiophile tastes, and so, somewhat surprisingly at this price point, the ‘phones use a sophisticated “balanced dual armature” design (meaning each earpiece provides separate, miniature woofer and tweeter drivers). Of course no Apple product would be complete without offering a few clever, functional twists, and Apple’s top-tier headphones are no exception. They incorporate a tiny, in-line remote/mic module that enables the ‘phones to function as a headset when used with 2G/3G iPhones and that provides limited remote control functions when used with newer generation iPods. Of course our top priorities (and probably yours, too) are sound quality and wearer comfort, and it’s on the basis of those two parameters that we’ll evaluate Apple’s top-shelf model to see how it compares to competing models in its price class.

 

OVERVIEW

Consider this headset if: you appreciate headphones that offer generally smooth and evenly balanced sound that offers a good measure of clarity and sonic subtlety. Apple’s in-ear headphones sound particular revealing through the broad middle of the midrange, where most music really happens. For owners of iPhones or newer generation iPods, these ‘phones offer a slick remote/mic module that adds lots of welcome functions.

Look elsewhere if: you favor headphones that offer powerful and deeply extended bass. Relative to competing models, Apple’s In-Ear Headphones offer superior balance and smoothness, but can sound somewhat subdued in the low end (or actually at both frequency extremes, if you listen carefully). Eartips may feel a little too “stiff” for long-term comfort.

Ratings (compared to similarly-priced in-ear headphones)

  • Tonal Balance: 9
  • Clarity: 9
  • Dynamics: 8
  • Comfort/Fit: 7
  • Sensitivity: 9
  • Value: 9

 

 

SONIC CHARACTER

The greatest strength of the Apple In-Ear Headphone is its generally smooth and even tonal balance, especially through the breadth of the midrange. In fact, compared to some other headphones in this price class, the Apples tend to sound just slightly midrange-forward, in part because their low bass and, to a lesser extent, extreme highs are slightly recessed.  While the Apple’s bass is well defined and offers good pitch definition, it doesn’t convey the sense of rich, powerful, foundational low-end response that some affordable headphones, such as the NuForce NE-7Ms or Skullcandy Titans, can provide.

If your sonic frame of reference is the stock earbuds that came with your iPod, then you may well find the superior resolution of Apple’s In-Ear Headphones revelatory. Suddenly, you’ll be able to access and enjoy low-level musical textures and details you may not have heard before. This is true partly because the Apple In-Ear Headphones offer very good measures of natural resolution and definition. However, their apparent clarity may also have to do with the fact that there is narrow band of midrange frequencies that the Apples tend to accentuate in an extremely subtle way. The result is a heightened sense of clarity, but one that sometimes comes at the expense of traces of that “midrange-forward” quality I mentioned above.

Comments

Stephen Kaus (not verified) -- Thu, 06/11/2009 - 13:00

A huge problem is that the esrtips fall off and Apple does not sell spares.  the guy at the Apple store says he puts on new rubber cenent each month, not an optimun solution IMHO.

Bruce Balestier (not verified) -- Thu, 06/11/2009 - 13:54

To whom it may concern:
This is the way to go.
http://www.sennheiserusa.com/private_headsets_mobile_bluetooth-wireless_...
 
 
 

Carlos Gallardo (not verified) -- Thu, 06/11/2009 - 15:38

 In the US$ 80 neighborhood I can say the UltimateEar  http://www.ultimateears.com/_ultimateears/store/products/metrofi220.php are most fine sounding that the Apple

PinballLes (not verified) -- Thu, 06/11/2009 - 17:24

I wonder what is the durability like on these headphones? I own the predecessor to this model, and I'm not particularly rough with them, and I'm onto my third pair now. I've found the sound to be to my liking, however I have found the durability to be poor. They seem to last for about 8 months before something breaks. My first pair the speaker part detached from the casing. My second pair the cover of the jack separated from the jack, and my current pair, the cover of the jack has separated from the jack, and the cover in the split separating the cable for the left ear and the right ear has moved exposing bare wires. I currently have them held together with tape. I'm a bit hesitant to spend more money on Apple headphones, given the durability problems with the previous model.

IEM thoughtrs (not verified) -- Fri, 06/12/2009 - 10:40

I've used Shure E4C headphones for some time, and while they are sonically better than the Apple phones reviewed here, they always end up crapping out eventually due to cord wear.  I wear these things all the time, including 30-70 mile training rides on my racing bicycle.
Here's what I've learned about the Apple headphones:
1.  The are extremely tough with one exception:  The ear tips can easily come off after they get worn.  I solved this by cutting a small ring of heatshrink and placing over the eartip right where it meets the body of the headphone.  A few seconds with the trusty cigarette lighter, and no more tips coming off.  I've used these guys daily for over three months now and not a problem.  They also seem to wear in a little sonically as they are played. 

Michael Bishop (not verified) -- Fri, 06/12/2009 - 13:18

They're more money for sure, but the Monster Cable Turbine Ear Speaker shows up everything I've heard in ear-bud type 'phones, including these Apple buds.  Really great sound and very durable, too

TRS (not verified) -- Fri, 06/12/2009 - 14:42

Early reports are that the Turbines are not that durable, and very microphonic, and have some rather poor stress relief. Check out some posts on head-fi.org to check on it.

TRS (not verified) -- Fri, 06/12/2009 - 14:40

Right now, you can get these as B box special son ebay (seller is onedollar28) for $35. These phones are a bargain at that price, and the alternatives being offere here (Senn MM50, for example) are bass bloated junk. I also own the Metro.Fi 200v, and the ADDIEMs are better performers.
As for the tips, there are places to get replacements, here
http://www.dealsishop.com/silicone-replacement-ear-tips-for-apple-in-ear...
But, better tips include the Comply T130 foamies (medium or large, both work, depending on ear size), or the Sony Hybrid tips, which are $10 on Amazon for 4 sizes.  When it comes to IEMs, you must experiment with alternative tips before you trash the phones in print. Granted, the OEM tips are not great, but there is more than one way to skin a cat, or hear these phones.
I've owned the Monster Turbines too (got them free as a review model), and while they are not bad at all, they cost $100 at their cheapest, and their highs sounded a bit plasticky to me. Not bad, but worth more than $70 than the ADDIEMs? Guess it depends on what you want. If you want more bass, then go ahead and spend the money. But if you want decent mids and hights, but just accurate bass, then spend $35 and get these.
I am not an Apple fanboy (I have a Touch, but also have a Zune, A Sony A818 and two Sansa Clips). But these phones are a very good deal.

Mark Jaworski (not verified) -- Sat, 06/13/2009 - 21:49

 They sound OK, but for the price they should have noise cancelling not just isolating. Original buds and even metal covers get lost easily. Wires are too delicate. They are not for iPhone, as "+" and "-" don't do a damn thing for iPhone. Only when I bought SHURE FOAM SLEEVES as a replacement part from another manufacturer, I got a good fit and good sound isolation. Another $20. Installing them required some fiddling and twisting, but they work.
Philips with a noise cancelling I use when flying to avoid a jet lag, being horny at the dinner time and hungry at bed time that is.
Apple do some noise cancelling for the masses, don't be cheap!

Anonymous2009 (not verified) -- Wed, 08/26/2009 - 22:38

they work fine with the iPhone: pause, play, skip, volume + and -, answer call 

All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1999 - 2011 NextScreen. All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.