PLAYBACK 24: Pioneer Elite SC-27 THX Ultra2 Plus-Certified A/V Receiver

Bringing the Advanced MCACC system into play takes the SC-27’s underlying qualities of clarity and transparency and, on the whole, sharpens their focus even further. Advanced MCACC is a very sophisticated system that measures and addresses multiple aspects of speaker performance and of the room/speaker interface with surprising levels of precision. The system can, for example, measure speaker positions to with about ½-inch tolerances, and then sets channel distances (or delay times) accordingly. Similarly, the system analyzes—and corrects for—problems in both frequency and phase response for speakers in the system, and also tests for problems with standing waves (or room resonances) and then applies programmable filters as necessary to eliminate their negative effects. Finally, the system even checks the reverb characteristics of the room and adjusts the speaker system to compensate.

When all is said and done, Advanced MCACC tunes your speaker system for flat in-room frequency response and smooth, evenly balanced phase response (or group delays) at your listening position. All of the measurements I’ve described above happen automatically when you use the Full Auto MCACC program. Just plug in the included calibration mic, position the mic in accordance with Pioneer’s instructions, launch the calibration process, and then wait as the system conducts its battery of tests and calculates appropriate speaker distance, level, EQ, and phase and reverb compensation settings for you. But for veteran A/V enthusiasts, the SC-27 offers two additional options: the Auto MCACC program, which provides some user customization of the setup process, or the Manual MCACC program, which allows extensive user customization and fine-tuning of the process. True, Auto MCACC and Manual MCACC require a fair amount of background knowledge on the user’s part, but they also help make the SC-27 more responsive to the needs and wishes of technically sophisticated users.

How does the receiver sound with Advanced MCACC adjustments in place? My experience was that all of the SC-27’s core sonic strengths remained in evidence, but that the overall system sound became tighter, more neutral in overall tonal balance, more crisply defined and more sharply focused and three-dimensional. This result is excellent, though it occasionally comes at a price: namely, a slight increase in overall perceived system brightness—at least on some material. This is not too surprising, since my past experience with room EQ systems suggests that when systems are adjusted for truly flat frequency response as measured at the listening position, they can strike some listeners as having somewhat elevated upper midrange and treble response. Even so, I feel the superior clarity and focus that Advanced MCACC provides more than outweighs any minor shifts in tonal balance.

Still, competing EQ systems from Audyssey and from Yamaha do give listeners the choice of applying either flat response settings or settings that dial in a judicious touch of upper midrange/treble roll-off (which subjectively gives systems a somewhat warmer, smoother, and some would say more “natural” sound). Perhaps Pioneer would do well to consider adding the option of a slightly more subdued “Natural” response curve—if only as a pleasing complement to the flat, AIR Studios Monitor-certified response curve it already provides. 

 

MOVIE/SOUNDTRACK PERFORMANCE

 I put on one of my favorite test films, Apocalypto, and was thrilled to hear the intensely involving and sharply focused sound the SC-27 produced in the Playback system when playing the disc.

The soundtrack of Apocalypto is impressive from end to end, but the “Warrior’s Death” sequence is a particular sonic treasure trove because it combines tense, rhythmically propulsive instrumental music, rich and vivid jungle noises, dark and strangely slow-paced choral sections, and incredibly closely-mic’d sound of the breaths and footfalls of two combatants who are about to engage in a battle to the death. The passage sounds good even on fairly modest systems, but it achieves altogether higher and more profound levels of impact when you bring the powers of an exceptional receiver such as the SC-27 to bear.

In the “Warrior’s Death” sequence, one soundtrack element I’ve probably heard dozens of time, yet not noticed with the impact I experienced with the Pioneer in my system, is the way the dark, somber choral accompaniment continues to build in intensity as the character Jaguar Paw faces off against his opponent. At the penultimate moment, tension rises to a crescendo as we hear the almost hyper-focused sounds of the two warriors drawing slow, furious breaths as they prepare to charge toward one another. The sounds of breaths being draw might seem like small, inconsequential details, but the Pioneer gives them extra weight and power by making them stand out in sharp relief.

Comments

discman -- Thu, 10/15/2009 - 10:32

Nice review. I particularly like the idea that Pioneer's room correction is adjustable. Net net, how does this system compare with Audyssey?

waterloo.bob (not verified) -- Thu, 10/15/2009 - 11:01

I have the SC-25 and concur that once setup using MCACC there is a slightly bright aspect to the top-end. Otherwise it's a sonically outstanding receiver. Just wondering if the reviewer found a fix for this?

MichaelG (not verified) -- Thu, 10/15/2009 - 11:27

I see a few features that improve on the SC-07 (user-upgradable firmware for one), but how about audio and video performance?  Any noticable changes?
 

Giovanna (not verified) -- Thu, 10/15/2009 - 11:38

It's all about the Burr Brown 192kHz/24-bit A/D and Wolfson WM8740 192kHz/24-bit DACs for me. Been eyeing this receiver since Pioneer announced it would include these!
I've been using an Elite 81TXV for three years and while the sound is very good, it's not necessarily a match for my Class A amp and other separates (which reside in my closet because of NY apartment space constrictions!). I hope I can get this unit soon...but THAT'S all about getting the $$ together.

Kelsci (not verified) -- Thu, 10/15/2009 - 12:04

I had a chance to audition this receiver but only in stereo mode in a store a few years ago. I auditoned the same music source against Denons, Sonys and Yamahas that were out at that time competing with this unit. IMHO, this Pioneer and the upper models that were selling were the only units to buy. The quality of reproduction of the music I heard was second to none; in fact the quality sounded more like something out of a MacIntosh and I said that to the salemen in the store. The stereo reproduction of the same music on the other models I mentioned above in stereo were nothing short of atrocious. Only the 80TXV from Pioneer did not have quality sound.

Matt W. (not verified) -- Thu, 10/15/2009 - 15:14

Yamaha recievers are trash on audio quality.  That's friggin' hilarious.  I've heard several >$10k separates that don't sound as good as a Yamaha playing stereo.

Hiendguy -- Thu, 10/15/2009 - 16:32

Kelsci,
Your statements about compariing "this Pioneer" unit with "other" modles a few years ago confuse me. The Pioneer has several ker technologies that are VERY current like the advanced surround decoding options, certification, etc. that were not available in an all out unit like this model, so what could you have been listening to, and I agree with Matt W. about Yamaha equipment. Yamha is known"industry wide" as a VERY GOOD manufactuerer of high quality great sounding"especially in stereo"  gear.

Hiendguy -- Thu, 10/15/2009 - 16:32

Kelsci,
Your statements about compariing "this Pioneer" unit with "other" modles a few years ago confuse me. The Pioneer has several ker technologies that are VERY current like the advanced surround decoding options, certification, etc. that were not available in an all out unit like this model, so what could you have been listening to, and I agree with Matt W. about Yamaha equipment. Yamha is known"industry wide" as a VERY GOOD manufactuerer of high quality great sounding"especially in stereo"  gear.

Hollis (not verified) -- Thu, 10/15/2009 - 12:30

Did you do any  wattage measurements to see if the unit perfomed as specified?

OnceLikedPioneer (not verified) -- Fri, 10/16/2009 - 18:38

I thought Pioneer was getting out of the home electronics business and focusing on automotive electronics? If that's true, why would I ever invest in Pioneer for my home?

Nobby (not verified) -- Sat, 10/17/2009 - 07:47

No not true. Pioneer have been suffering trying to make a buck out of plasma (universally rated the best around) and have taken a real financial
beating, however they have always worked  hard to bring something special to the world of audio and their optical expertise stretch from bluray to
the creation of the laser disc.  I understand that after exiting the flat panel business they will continue strongly in car audio, navigation and
the home entertainment area. It appears their association with Britain's Air studios is continuing to pay dividends. Last years Elite model A/V receiver
was voted "Receiver of the year" in the U.K.  This looks like a brilliant follow up from what i've read.

Henry P. (not verified) -- Wed, 10/21/2009 - 14:19

I has a speaker set from NHT classic .  Is Elite sc-27 good match for my speaker?
Thanks

Henry P. (not verified) -- Wed, 10/21/2009 - 14:18

I has a speaker set from NHT classic .  Is Elite sc-27 good match for my speaker?
Thanks

sg (not verified) -- Sun, 10/25/2009 - 22:46

Hellow - these 2 receivers have both received very good reviews from your publication and seem to be in the same class.  Would you be able to comment on any sonic differences between the two?  I am weighing the potential purchase of one of these, and would be pairing it with either a def tech ST based system or a Mirage OMD-28 based system.  I tend to dislike "bright" sounding equipment, and generally enjoy the warmth of Yamaha to the sound of Denon, which often sounds hard and edgy to me.
Any comments that you might be able to make between the 2 would be quite helpful.  Thank you much.

sg (not verified) -- Sun, 10/25/2009 - 22:48

sorry - didn't realize that the subject didn't populate the body.  The two receivers I was asking you to compare were the Pioneer sc-27 and the Onkyo SR-tx876.  Thank you

davidyan (not verified) -- Tue, 10/27/2009 - 16:32

nice review.

rkohler0@cox.net -- Sat, 11/07/2009 - 09:55

Chris,
I enjoyed your review of the Pioneer SC-27 very much.  I am currently considering a Yamaha RX-V3900 and thought I'd locked on this decision.  After reading your review of the Pioneer, I'm waffling some.  I realize the Pioneer has the THX certification, which seems to be an advantage over the Yamaha, but in many other respects these units are very similar.  I appreciate the Yamaha's advanced sound processing capabilities, which seem a step above the Pioneer (I realize many poo-poo these, but I've always like them.)  In addition, I think the Anchor Bay video processing in the Yamaha is a win.  It appears the user interface received a better score than the Pioneer too.
Do you have a recommendation for one over the other?  I've noted that the Pioneer can be had (from an authorized retailer) for around $1400, while the Yamaha goes for nearly $1800.  Too much $$$ to ignore in the overall decision possibly.
Thanks,
- Rob (San Diego)

dn54168 (not verified) -- Mon, 11/09/2009 - 00:21

Hi Rob,
In this price range, you might want to consider the Denon AVR-4310CI.  I think it has better separation, more detail, and bigger sound stage than the Pioneer SC-27.  I have demo both at Bestbuy and decided to go with the Denon.  I was able to get the unit for $1399 w/ 3yr interest free financing down from $1999 after speaking w/ the manager.
 
 

rkohler0@cox.net -- Mon, 11/09/2009 - 11:26

Thanks.
I've considered Denon in the past, but they've received really negative reviews of both their user interface, remotes, and manuals that I've dropped them from my list.
 
- Rob

Marty B (not verified) -- Mon, 11/09/2009 - 19:01

 >>>I think it has better separation
That's absurd.  Even a $100 receiver has more than 90db separation between channels when playing back anything but radio and vinyl.   There is no way you could be hearing BETTER separation via the receiver, assuming by separation, you mean separation between the channels.   All you have to do is put a test CD, DVD or Blu-ray that sends audio to one channel at a time to prove this.   If you can't hear anything in the other channels when a signal is playing in the designated channel, than the separation is perfect.  And you'll find that it will be in any receiver that doesn't have a short.  

Uncommon sense (not verified) -- Sun, 01/03/2010 - 07:57

Good for the audio industry there are so many of us concerned about sound, music, and movies! Also good to hear people point out that separation in a high quality av receiver, especially one with THX certification, is not something that's a concern. I can tell you from working with THX to obtain their certification that noise, separation, distortion, etc. are huge concerns for them and very difficult standards must be met. These standards are not audiophile snakeoil but very specific and stringent numbers for distortion, separation, long term power without overheat, etc. . They focus on what makes electronics perform at a level not obtainable many years ago. It's interesting to me that nobody has commented on the ICE amplification mentioned here. Bang & Olufsen own this technology and is being implemented under license by several ultra high end manufacturers in their separate components. It is one of the few amplifiers of any kind which doubles its power as impedance is halfved, i.e. 100 watts at 8 Ohms/200 watts at 4 Ohms. Krell and other hugely expensive separates amplifiers will achieve this but at the expense of lots of dollars and lots of heat! The ICE technology does this for low cost and extremely low heat. That you get this amplifier performance alone would be worth far more than $2,000, competing as it does with high end separates. Doubling of power as impedance is halved is the benchmark for high end amp performance, current capability, and the ability to drive any speaker regardless of how difficult the load presented. ICE technology accomplishes what used to take massive transformers, filter caps, etc. and the associated size, weight, heat, and cost. If you used to long for the performance of Levinson, Krell, and other wonderful companies, ICE has delivered the biggest performance advantage those companies offer: current capability out the wazoo (wazoo is a technical term too complex to cover here). That it does so without the weight, size, heat, or cost means we live in a wonderful age where technology is bringing high end sound to the masses! Exciting stuff! BTW, several highly respected manufacturers such as Macintosh use ICE as well...Pioneer is to be commended for offering ICE amplification. 5 years ago you would have paid WAY over $10,000 to get a standalone amplifier with this low impedance drive capability with the possible exception of the Sunfire amps. That Pioneer offers it with a processor, tuner, room optimization, etc for $2K makes this a glorious time to be an audiophile hobbyist!

Tom Devey (not verified) -- Thu, 12/10/2009 - 22:30

Can you provide any insight on how this receiver compares to the ARCAM FMJ AVR600 which is presently considered to be a benchmark in Home Theatre audio performance?

Tunejunky (not verified) -- Thu, 01/07/2010 - 13:49

i haven't auditioned the FMJ in my house but i have the SC-27 in my media room. what i can offer is some insight into the *abilities* of each brand. Pioneer is both a manufacturer and a brand, Arcam does not *make* anything, rather it tweaks products oem'd to spec. that doesn't mean it SOUNDS bad, but that it has higher costs. reputedly, Arcam spent one million dollars developing the AVR600, which is considerably less than what Pioneer pays to Lucasfilm in royalties each year. What is more interesting, and a game changer to me is/was the implementation of the Bang & Olufsen ICEpower technology. This receiver sounds so good my Meridien M-80/MacBook Pro system has been expelled to the bedroom. I'm using the Oppo BDP-80, Panasonic tcp 50 v10 plasma, Elite SC 27 receiver, ATC SCM 11 (L&R) and C3C with Orb Audio Mod2 (x4) surrounds, HP m9060n Media PC

Tunejunky (not verified) -- Thu, 01/07/2010 - 14:14

btw, i am using the Benchmark DAC-1usb with my Mac/Meridien system that's now in the bedroom. the SC-27's built in dual dacs/upsampling *outperformed* the Benchmark DAC on my ATC monitors in my room, both with and without room correction.

All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1999 - 2011 NextScreen. All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.