PLAYBACK 23: Usher Audio Mini Dancer Two floorstanding loudspeaker

The Top Tier Starts Here

One small word of caution is in order, though. Because the Mini Dancer two can play very loudly without apparent distress, it can be tempting to turn up volume levels higher than is wise. The Ushers will let you get away with this, up to a point, but if really big crescendos come along when volume levels are already cranked to the nines, it is possible to overload the Mini Dancer Two, causing the sound to become congested and, if further provoked, to take on a somewhat raw edge that tells you it’s time to back things down.

 

Musical Examples

The Mini Dancer Twos are never more fully in their element than when playing really well-recorded acoustic jazz material, a great example of which would be Jen Chapin’s delightful reVisions [Chesky, SACD], which features reinterpretations of classic songs of Stevie Wonder as performed by a masterful jazz trio. I put on “Master Blaster (Jammin’)” and was floored by several aspects of the performance at once.

First, the Mini Dancer Two’s gave a powerful and breathtakingly nuanced rendition of Stephan Crump’s nimble, syncopated acoustic bass lines. The Usher’s not only conveyed the size and sound of the wooden body of the bass, but also let me hear subtle cues that let me know when Crump was leaning forward to dig in and apply more pressure as he plucked the instrument’s strings—giving some phrases an extra bit of “pop” or giving others more emphasis by teasing out a deeper, more sustained “growl.”

Similarly, the Ushers did a phenomenal job with Chris Cheeks’ gorgeous sax performance. Cheeks stands to the left side of the side of the stage, which the Mini Dancer Twos clearly revealed, and as he plays the speakers exposed even the subtlest shifts in dynamics, revealing delicate reed sounds and mouthpiece noises, Cheeks’ breathing between phrases, and the sound of his fingertips flying from one fingering position to another as soaring lines erupt from his horn. The sound of the sax was so compelling through the Ushers, in fact, that it was easy to let my attention be drawn to that instrument alone.

But in the center of the stage, and standing a few feet further back than Crump and Cheeks, is Jen Chapin—a vocalist whose evocative and at times feisty style fits Wonder’s music to a “T.” The Ushers quickly revealed Chapin’s gift for modulating both the dynamics and pitch of her voice to turn lines some singers would pass over lightly into unforgettable hooks. At some points in “Master Blaster (Jammin’)” , for example, the Mini Dancer Two’s let you hear Chapin wind up, like an athlete preparing for a surge of exertion, and then explode into a musical phrase with full force, belting out certain lines an intense burst of exuberance.

Finally, throughout reVisions, the Ushers do the trick that all really fine speakers do, which is to show how the acoustics and reverberant qualities of the recording space (St Peter’s Episcopal Church in New York City, in this case) are, in a sense, “phantom performers” that contribute much to the overall feel and vibe of the recording. Because the trio is so open and exposed in this record, you can easily hear how individual musical lines and phrases sometimes energize the room, and then slowly and gracefully decay back into silence.

In all the ways I’ve outlined above, the Mini Dancer Two’s served and enlivened, but did not embellish upon, this spectacular recording. Who could ask more than that?

To answer questions about the Mini Dancer Two’s low bass capabilities, I put on the third movement (“Landscape: Lento”) of Vaughan Williams’ Sinfonia antartica [Bakels/Bournemouth; Naxos, CD], which features recurrent pipe organ passages and themes that vary in pitch, timbre, and volume levels. I felt the Mini Dancer Two acquitted itself very well, never flinching or faltering as organ pedal notes descended lower and lower. I’ve played this movement many times on systems with and without subwoofers, and my sense was that the Usher’s offered sufficient depth and power that a sub wasn’t really necessary (although once again, low bass aficionados might beg to differ and want a sub to extract the last few ounces of low frequency “shudder” of which the pipe organ is capable on this track). My only critical observation would be that the Ushers might be a touch under damped down at the very bottom of their response range.

      

Comments

Xenondon (not verified) -- Thu, 08/13/2009 - 14:40

In your opinion, how would you compare the sound of the Usher MD2 to the likes of say the old faithful ProAc Response 2.5 and/or any of the Silverline Sonatina generations?  As those being my two favorites in that speaker category, I would enjoy hearing some thoughts of comparison. Happy listening!

mc4b (not verified) -- Sat, 05/15/2010 - 14:12

I would also like to hear your thoughts on how the Usher compares to ProAc 2.5s or D28s. I'm a big fan of the Proac house sound, but I heard the mini 2's at a local dealer recently and they had me thinking maybe I could switch my allegiances.

Cam -- Fri, 06/18/2010 - 20:01

I'd also be interested in opinions on how the Usher MD2 compares to similar designs from ProAc such as the higher priced D38s or more economical Studio 140s. I'm looking to upgrade my Studio 140s and wonder if the MD2s would be a candidate (without spending significantly more on the D38s)...

TNTguy (not verified) -- Thu, 08/13/2009 - 15:27

Great review Chris. How would you say the Mini Twos compare to the Usher 8571? Midrange, soundstage, etc? The 8571s are a little big for my setup and also a little expensive as well so I was hoping you could shed some light on the pros/cons of the Twos vs. 8571. It seems the Twos would be a more natural fit for me but I was interested in some additional insight. Thanks.

Chris Martens -- Mon, 09/28/2009 - 11:15

 TNTguy,
 
Thanks for your excellent question. Let me preface my comments by saying that it has been a while since I had the CP8571 MkII's in my home, so that I have not had a chance to hear the speakers side by side. Going from memory though, I would say the the 8571 offers a very slightly more midrange-forward sound, slightly more extended and cleaner bass, and a bigger dynamic envelope overall (those last two virtues owing to the fact that the 8571 has a dedicated bass driver, whereas the MD2 uses its two mid-bass drivers to handle both midrange and bass duties).
 
That said, however, the differences are (I think) relatively small in an absolute sense, and would likely become less and less noticeable in medium-sized or smaller istening spaces. On the plus side of the ledger for the MD2, I'd have to say it is one of the most effortless, easygoing, 3D imagers/soundstagers in the whole Usher lineup, and has the property of gradually becoming more open and transparent as playing time accumulates.
 
In terms of absolute sound quality, I think the 8571 MkII gets the nod, but the MD2 is not far off the pace at all and is--hands down--the price/performance ratio winner.  The MD2 review samples just went back to Usher for use as demo units at RMAF 2009, and I'd have to say I miss them already.
 
Best, Chris Martens

Chris Martens
Editor, Avguide.com/Playback/The Perfect Vision 

7ryder -- Thu, 10/29/2009 - 16:57

Hi Chris -
Based upon Usher reviews and your review of the Mini Dancer Twos, they are on my shortlist for new speakers.  Also on this list are PSB Synchrony Ones.  Neither dealer here in Seattle has these in stock so I haven't been able to listen to them.  That said, the PSB dealer is offering a no-risk in home try for a couple of weeks; haven't gotten the same offer from the Usher dealer yet. 
 
I'll be using the speakers in a room that I use for both HT and 2-channel listening.  Amp is a solid state Wyred 4 Sound multichannel with 500 watts per channel.  Passive W4S preamp for two channel and an Onkyo 886P processor for movies. My room isn't very large and my listening position is about 12' from the front wall.  I assume that either speaker would end up sounding better about 3' from the front wall.
 
Frankly, every thing else being equal, I really prefer the look of the MD 2s.  That said the offer by the PSB dealer is tempting.  Before I take the PSB guy up on his offer, what are your thoughts on the two speakers?  I don't want to pull the trigger on the PSBs if the MD 2s are clearly better.  Thanks.
 
 
ChrisG
Seattle, WA
 
 

John B (not verified) -- Thu, 11/05/2009 - 12:42

I heard the MD2's at RMAF on the last day.  We used some pretty taxing music, including Mahler's 5th and Duke Ellington big band, and I was blown away that a $5K list price speaker could sound that good.  I currently have Wilson Bensch Curves $11K) and have had Dali Euphonia MS-4s ($10K) and Dali Helicon 800's ($8K).  The reviewer is quite correct to say that the MD2 competes handily in the $10K price range.  They are absolutely gorgeous to look at as well, and the fit and finish is top drawer.
Larry at Resolution Audio in Seattle is an Usher dealer and told me Tuesday that he will be bringing th ese into the shop soon.  Give him a call so you can hear for yourself.

lovemusic (not verified) -- Mon, 01/18/2010 - 14:19

Resolution Audio Video bring high end audio a bad name. Ran by incredibly rude indignant jerks like Larry who offends customers. Worse than used car salesmen. These buffoons bring bad names to audiophiles. Avoid at all cost!

Sean K (not verified) -- Fri, 01/29/2010 - 18:55

Chris,

I had the pleasure of listening to both of these speakers at CES last year. Both of them made my list (and the list was short) of true stand-outs at the show. Either one of these speakers will bring a smile to your face each time you fire them up, but of the two, I preferred the PSB. I don't have time to go into detail, I just wanted to let you know my preference. Take your dealer up on his offer, then negotiate a bit on price in light of the current economy. Enjoy!

Sean

Cam -- Wed, 08/04/2010 - 12:08

Hi Chris,

Thanks for the comparison between the 8571 and the MD2. I listened to the 8571 the other day and was blown away by the sound - it seemed pretty much perfect for my taste. However, after some measuring, I found the 8571 is too deep for my 15' by 18' living room (since the speakers need to be placed on the long wall in my set up). Since the cost of the 8571 is not so much of an obstacle as its size (depth), I wonder if you'd recommend I consider the Usher Mini Dancer Diamond as a substitute or another speaker in the 8571 price range that is not as deep?

Thanks!

Cam

mikestpaul -- Sun, 11/08/2009 - 20:02

I was considering a purchase of the Be-718 but now that I've read about the Mini Dancer Two's, they've peaked my interest. Recalling how important adequate power is a must for the 718 model, what have people found with the new Mini Dancers - do they still need an abundance of power and, if so, how much.
Does anyone have suggestions on specific amps (integrated or seperates) that are good matches for the Mini Dancer?
Thanks.
Mike

mikestpaul -- Sun, 11/08/2009 - 20:02

I was considering a purchase of the Be-718 but now that I've read about the Mini Dancer Two's, they've peaked my interest. Recalling how important adequate power is a must for the 718 model, what have people found with the new Mini Dancers - do they still need an abundance of power and, if so, how much.
Does anyone have suggestions on specific amps (integrated or seperates) that are good matches for the Mini Dancer?
Thanks.
Mike

Chris Martens -- Mon, 11/09/2009 - 11:59

 mikestpaul,

I found the Mini Dancer Two's were easy to to drive, though of course sensitive to the quality of power they are fed. During my review listening sessions, I drove the MD2s first with my reference Musical Fidelity kW 500 hybrid integrated amp (probably overkill at 500 wpc), which sounded great, but also got excellent results with the much more modestly priced Bel Canto S300iUSB integrated amp/USB DAC.

Here's a link to the Bel Canto review: http://www.avguide.com/review/playback-24-bel-canto-design-s300iusb-integrated-amplifierdac

Best,

Chris Martens

Chris Martens
Editor, Avguide.com/Playback/The Perfect Vision 

mrmotor (not verified) -- Sun, 12/20/2009 - 16:20

Chris,
I have the opportunity to pick up a used pair of Mini Dancer two's. I'm currently using Von Schweikert VR-2's with either a Cary SLI-80 integrated or Bat VK3I & VK200 amp. I have a smaller room 12" x 23". I know it's impossible for you to say but do you have any feeling on how these two speakers compare to each other.
Best Regards
Keith

Chris Martens -- Mon, 12/21/2009 - 11:06

mrmotor,

As it happens, I do have a lot of experience with both speakers, having used a set of VR-2s as a long-term affordable reference in the past (the VR-2s have since gone back to Von Schweikert).

I would say that, good though the VR-2s are, the Mini Dancer Two are in an entirely different (higher) price and performance class. In practice, this means the Mini Dancer Two can do everything the VR-2s can and more. The only element of the VR-2 that you might miss (or not) is the rear-firing ambience driver. But that said, I would say the Mini Dancer 2 offers more focused imaging and precise soundstaging--albeit without the VR-2's "ambience wash" against the back wall.

Best,

Chris Martens

Chris Martens
Editor, Avguide.com/Playback/The Perfect Vision 

mrmotor -- Mon, 01/17/2011 - 10:57

Chris,
Thanks for the info. I have since purchased a pair of the mini II's and need your help. Going from the VR2's using all the same gear I find the top end energy of the Mini's a bit strong. My current cables are Homegrown Audio Silver Lace. These are a pure silver braided cable similar to the Kimbers. My question is what cables were you using when you had these as I may need to make a change.

Regards
Keith

mcawaw (not verified) -- Thu, 01/21/2010 - 04:18

how the mini dancer 2 compared to the cp-8871? right now I have Be-718, and now I can't decide which is the best way to upgrade, is it Mini dancer 2 or 8871 or I just add a sub like Rel or JL Audio Fathom series. it is because I can't go to hear them

Chris Martens -- Thu, 01/21/2010 - 11:21

mcawaw,

Let me address your several questions as best I can.

1) The Be-718 is, and in my book always will be, a great speaker and a great value. That said, my opinion--and it is only that--is that it is tricky to add subs to speakers that good without introducing at least some problems with textural discontinuities down low.

2) The original Mini Dancer 2 is voiced a bit differently than the BE-718, offering a slightly more distant perspective on the music/soundstage, but with greater bass extension and a broader dynamic envelope.

3) I don't have a lot of experience with the CP-8871 (I'm more familiar with the CP-8571). That said, my past experience with various Usher models that use dual woofers (e.g., the mighty BE-20) is that they are geared to sound best in very large rooms. The dual woofers, I think, can easily over-drive small-to-mid-size spaces.

4) Here's an alternative to consider: the just-announced-at-CES 2010 Usher Dancer Mini 2 Diamond (note the slightly "inverted" naming nomenclature). This is essentially a variation on (and in my view, a potentially significant step forward from) the original Mini Dancer 2. Here are the changes, to the best of my knowledge. First, the original Be-style tweeter has been replaced with a new "Diamond" series tweeter that uses an exotic metal dome (the alloy, I'm told, includes titanium, aluminum, magnesium, and a very tiny amount of beryllium) that is treated on both its front and back sides with a stiff "diamond-like" carbon coating. Second, the internal cabinet bracing has been improved. Third, the original wooden floor plinth has been replaced with a gorgeous cast iron piece (finished in matte black) and equipped with greatly improved floor spikes. I haven't reviewed the speaker, of course, but my initial impressions were very favorable; the Mini 2 Diamond does everything the original Mini 2 did, but sounds even more open and transparent, with somewhat tighter bass. I also think the Diamond version more closely matches the voicing of the original Be-718 (although there is now a Diamond version of that speaker, too).

Best,

Chris Martens

Chris Martens
Editor, Avguide.com/Playback/The Perfect Vision 

7ryder -- Fri, 01/22/2010 - 00:30

A new improved model? That sucks...I've had mine for just more than a month and am still waiting for the BE-616 center channel speaker to go with the Dancer Mini 2s..do you know when the new version will be available and do you know if the BE-616 center channel speaker will also have a diamond version?

Chris Martens -- Fri, 01/22/2010 - 10:26

chris.gossard

Let me respond to your questions as best I can.

1) I'm not 100% certain of the availability date for the new Diamond-series models, though I assume it will be fairly soon since Usher was talking about the possibility of review samples becoming available in the fairly near term.

2) Yes, there will be a BE-616 Diamond version.

3) I believe Usher intends to make available to current BE-series speaker owners its new DMD "Diamond" tweeters, which, as I understand it, are a drop-in replacement for the original Be tweeters (i.e., supposedly the Diamond-series tweeter do not require any crossover network changes). To explore that option, contact Usher USA: info [at] musikmatters [dot] com

Best,

Chris Martens

Chris Martens
Editor, Avguide.com/Playback/The Perfect Vision 

Roger Saunders (not verified) -- Thu, 02/25/2010 - 12:41

Hi Chris,
I live in England and have just received my copy of TAS 201 (March 2010). I thought I'd see the Usher Mini Dancer 2s included in the Editors Choice Awards as you were so enthusiastic about them in Playback 23 and HiFi Plus recently. I heard the Mini Dancer 1s in a home demo (all the Mini Dancer 2s were sold out in the UK since your HiFi Plus review) but I was impressed enough with the MD1s to order a pair of Dancer Mini 2 Diamonds, which I'm still waiting anxiously for. Beautiful speaker and great sound. Thanks for the reviews.

mv (not verified) -- Mon, 03/08/2010 - 14:02

Great review-
I was wondering if you had heard the PSB Synchrony One and how the Mini 2 might compare to these speakers? They are priced exactly the same ($5K). Thanks!
mv

mv (not verified) -- Thu, 03/04/2010 - 13:18

Great review-
I was wondering if you had heard the PSB Synchrony One and how the Mini 2 might compare to these speakers? They are priced exactly the same ($5K). Thanks!
mv

kerem (not verified) -- Sun, 05/16/2010 - 11:52

hi chirs,

how would u compare the usher MD2 with Opera Quinta????

micheal848 -- Sat, 08/28/2010 - 23:21

Well Chris, it's been a year since your review, are you still psyched about the MD2's? Now that the Maggie 1.7's are the out, would you care to comment on a comparison of the two? I realize it's not apples to apples, but I'm interested in your analysis. Thanks.

All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1999 - 2011 NextScreen. All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.