PLAYBACK 23: Usher Audio Mini Dancer Two floorstanding loudspeaker

The Top Tier Starts Here

Products in this article:Mini Dancer Two floorstanding loudspeaker

 

Playback readers who follow the forum section of our parent Web site www.avguide.com will already know that Usher’s superb Be-718 stand-mount monitor speaker ($2795/pair) comes up frequently in discussions and has generated a lot of reader interest. The Be-718 was favorably reviewed by Robert Harley, editor-in-chief of The Absolute Sound, and has gone on to win many awards both from our own and other publications. It’s a speaker that has earned a reputation as one of those magical “go to” products that successfully caters to listeners with (very) high-end tastes, but whose price fits within sensible, real-world budgets. What’s not to like about that? 

Well, good though the Be-718 is, it does have a few acknowledged limitations such as adequate but not great low bass response as well as an inevitably limited dynamic envelope (the Be-718 offers serious dynamic punch as traditional stand-mount monitors go, but—let’s face it—it is not a full-sized floorstander). To get a handle on the mission profile of Usher’s new Mini Dancer Two, then, picture it as an attempt to build a speaker that preserves the essential goodness of the Be-718, but that addresses customers’ expressed desire for deeper bass and an even more expansive dynamic envelope.

Usher calls it top tier speakers the Dancer series, of which the Be-718 (also known as the “Tiny Dancer”) is the entry-level model. In the past, the next step up the line was the superb CP-8571 Mk II, which is a wonderful speaker, but one that sells for well over $10,000/pair (too big a step up for many prospective customers to handle). To bridge this gap, Usher has created a pair of Mini Dancer models—the Mini Dancer One and Two. We chose to review the Mini Dancer Two, partly because it appears to offer much more performance headroom than the Mini Dancer One does, and partly because its design is more strongly differentiated from that of the Be-718.

The Mini Dancer Two uses the same exotic metal dome tweeter as the Be-718 plus two of the 718’s mid-bass drivers, placing them in a D’Appolito array and housing them in a tall, deep, reflex-loaded floorstanding enclosure with beautifully curved sidewalls. The resulting speaker is quite large (believe us when we tell you it is “mini” in name only) and strikingly handsome, with an overall level of fit and finish that makes the Mini Dancer Two seem more expensive than it really is. And as you’ll discover in a moment, the theme of value that belies price applies to the sound of this speaker, too.

 

 

Overview

Consider this speaker if: you have admired the look and sound of premium priced speakers in the roughly $10k range, but simply could not afford them. In essence, the Mini Dancer Two cuts the cost of entry to that performance spectrum in half. The Mini Dancer Two preserves most of the strengths of the Be-718 (sonic transparency, neutral tonal balance, richness and purity of timbres, and an involving and expressive sound) while delivering noticeably deeper bass extension and even more expansive dynamics. In fact, in some respects it is nipping at the heels of Usher’s larger Dancer models, which is saying a mouthful.

Look further if: you were hoping for a speaker that identically matches the voicing and imaging characteristics of the Be-718’s. In practice, we observed two subtle but noteworthy differences between the Usher siblings. First, the Mini Dancer Two gives a slightly more distant perspective on the music, throwing a soundstage that unfolds behind the plane of the speakers, whereas the Be-718 tends to be more of an “up front” imager. Second, the Mini Dancer Two sounds perhaps a hair less midrange-forward than the Be-718, offering a sound that is arguably richer and smoother, but just slightly more reserved.

Ratings (relative to comparably priced floorstanding loudspeakers)

  • Treble: 10
  • Midrange: 9
  • Bass: 9
  • Soundstaging: 10
  • Dynamics: 9
  • Value: 10

 

Features

  • Usher’s signature exotic metal (beryllium/titanium) 1.25-inch dome tweeter
  • Two of Usher’s model 8948A 7-inch mid-bass drivers with composite-reinforced pulp cone diaphragms (the same mid-bass drivers used in several of Usher’s larger and more expensive Dancer models).
  • Rigid, curved-wall enclosures (to help minimize internal standing waves) equipped with thick, massive front baffle plates that provide a stiff, vibration-resistant mounting platform for the speaker’s drivers.
  • A massive floor pedestal provides a stable, tip-resistant platform for speakers, themselves, complete with recessed, tapped mounting holes for (included) adjustable brass floor spikes.
  • High quality, bi-wire ready binding posts (though some will complain the posts are not quite as nice as those used on Usher’s top-of-line Be-20/Be-10 speakers).
  • Optional finishes include gloss piano black lacquer or dark “pioneer” birch (which looks and feels downright sumptuous).
  • Forward-firing bass reflex port.

 

Comments

Xenondon (not verified) -- Thu, 08/13/2009 - 13:40

In your opinion, how would you compare the sound of the Usher MD2 to the likes of say the old faithful ProAc Response 2.5 and/or any of the Silverline Sonatina generations?  As those being my two favorites in that speaker category, I would enjoy hearing some thoughts of comparison. Happy listening!

TNTguy (not verified) -- Thu, 08/13/2009 - 14:27

Great review Chris. How would you say the Mini Twos compare to the Usher 8571? Midrange, soundstage, etc? The 8571s are a little big for my setup and also a little expensive as well so I was hoping you could shed some light on the pros/cons of the Twos vs. 8571. It seems the Twos would be a more natural fit for me but I was interested in some additional insight. Thanks.

Chris Martens -- Mon, 09/28/2009 - 10:15

 TNTguy,
 
Thanks for your excellent question. Let me preface my comments by saying that it has been a while since I had the CP8571 MkII's in my home, so that I have not had a chance to hear the speakers side by side. Going from memory though, I would say the the 8571 offers a very slightly more midrange-forward sound, slightly more extended and cleaner bass, and a bigger dynamic envelope overall (those last two virtues owing to the fact that the 8571 has a dedicated bass driver, whereas the MD2 uses its two mid-bass drivers to handle both midrange and bass duties).
 
That said, however, the differences are (I think) relatively small in an absolute sense, and would likely become less and less noticeable in medium-sized or smaller istening spaces. On the plus side of the ledger for the MD2, I'd have to say it is one of the most effortless, easygoing, 3D imagers/soundstagers in the whole Usher lineup, and has the property of gradually becoming more open and transparent as playing time accumulates.
 
In terms of absolute sound quality, I think the 8571 MkII gets the nod, but the MD2 is not far off the pace at all and is--hands down--the price/performance ratio winner.  The MD2 review samples just went back to Usher for use as demo units at RMAF 2009, and I'd have to say I miss them already.
 
Best, Chris Martens

Chris Martens
Editor, Playback
playback.avguide.com 

chris.gossard@g... -- Thu, 10/29/2009 - 15:57

Hi Chris -
Based upon Usher reviews and your review of the Mini Dancer Twos, they are on my shortlist for new speakers.  Also on this list are PSB Synchrony Ones.  Neither dealer here in Seattle has these in stock so I haven't been able to listen to them.  That said, the PSB dealer is offering a no-risk in home try for a couple of weeks; haven't gotten the same offer from the Usher dealer yet. 
 
I'll be using the speakers in a room that I use for both HT and 2-channel listening.  Amp is a solid state Wyred 4 Sound multichannel with 500 watts per channel.  Passive W4S preamp for two channel and an Onkyo 886P processor for movies. My room isn't very large and my listening position is about 12' from the front wall.  I assume that either speaker would end up sounding better about 3' from the front wall.
 
Frankly, every thing else being equal, I really prefer the look of the MD 2s.  That said the offer by the PSB dealer is tempting.  Before I take the PSB guy up on his offer, what are your thoughts on the two speakers?  I don't want to pull the trigger on the PSBs if the MD 2s are clearly better.  Thanks.
 
 
ChrisG
Seattle, WA
 
 

John B (not verified) -- Thu, 11/05/2009 - 11:42

I heard the MD2's at RMAF on the last day.  We used some pretty taxing music, including Mahler's 5th and Duke Ellington big band, and I was blown away that a $5K list price speaker could sound that good.  I currently have Wilson Bensch Curves $11K) and have had Dali Euphonia MS-4s ($10K) and Dali Helicon 800's ($8K).  The reviewer is quite correct to say that the MD2 competes handily in the $10K price range.  They are absolutely gorgeous to look at as well, and the fit and finish is top drawer.
Larry at Resolution Audio in Seattle is an Usher dealer and told me Tuesday that he will be bringing th ese into the shop soon.  Give him a call so you can hear for yourself.

lovemusic (not verified) -- Mon, 01/18/2010 - 13:19

Resolution Audio Video bring high end audio a bad name. Ran by incredibly rude indignant jerks like Larry who offends customers. Worse than used car salesmen. These buffoons bring bad names to audiophiles. Avoid at all cost!

Sean K (not verified) -- Fri, 01/29/2010 - 17:55

Chris,

I had the pleasure of listening to both of these speakers at CES last year. Both of them made my list (and the list was short) of true stand-outs at the show. Either one of these speakers will bring a smile to your face each time you fire them up, but of the two, I preferred the PSB. I don't have time to go into detail, I just wanted to let you know my preference. Take your dealer up on his offer, then negotiate a bit on price in light of the current economy. Enjoy!

Sean

mikestpaul -- Sun, 11/08/2009 - 19:02

I was considering a purchase of the Be-718 but now that I've read about the Mini Dancer Two's, they've peaked my interest. Recalling how important adequate power is a must for the 718 model, what have people found with the new Mini Dancers - do they still need an abundance of power and, if so, how much.
Does anyone have suggestions on specific amps (integrated or seperates) that are good matches for the Mini Dancer?
Thanks.
Mike

mikestpaul -- Sun, 11/08/2009 - 19:02

I was considering a purchase of the Be-718 but now that I've read about the Mini Dancer Two's, they've peaked my interest. Recalling how important adequate power is a must for the 718 model, what have people found with the new Mini Dancers - do they still need an abundance of power and, if so, how much.
Does anyone have suggestions on specific amps (integrated or seperates) that are good matches for the Mini Dancer?
Thanks.
Mike

Chris Martens -- Mon, 11/09/2009 - 10:59

 mikestpaul,

I found the Mini Dancer Two's were easy to to drive, though of course sensitive to the quality of power they are fed. During my review listening sessions, I drove the MD2s first with my reference Musical Fidelity kW 500 hybrid integrated amp (probably overkill at 500 wpc), which sounded great, but also got excellent results with the much more modestly priced Bel Canto S300iUSB integrated amp/USB DAC.

Here's a link to the Bel Canto review: http://www.avguide.com/review/playback-24-bel-canto-design-s300iusb-integrated-amplifierdac

Best,

Chris Martens

Chris Martens
Editor, Playback
playback.avguide.com 

mrmotor (not verified) -- Sun, 12/20/2009 - 15:20

Chris,
I have the opportunity to pick up a used pair of Mini Dancer two's. I'm currently using Von Schweikert VR-2's with either a Cary SLI-80 integrated or Bat VK3I & VK200 amp. I have a smaller room 12" x 23". I know it's impossible for you to say but do you have any feeling on how these two speakers compare to each other.
Best Regards
Keith

Chris Martens -- Mon, 12/21/2009 - 10:06

mrmotor,

As it happens, I do have a lot of experience with both speakers, having used a set of VR-2s as a long-term affordable reference in the past (the VR-2s have since gone back to Von Schweikert).

I would say that, good though the VR-2s are, the Mini Dancer Two are in an entirely different (higher) price and performance class. In practice, this means the Mini Dancer Two can do everything the VR-2s can and more. The only element of the VR-2 that you might miss (or not) is the rear-firing ambience driver. But that said, I would say the Mini Dancer 2 offers more focused imaging and precise soundstaging--albeit without the VR-2's "ambience wash" against the back wall.

Best,

Chris Martens

Chris Martens
Editor, Playback
playback.avguide.com 

mcawaw (not verified) -- Thu, 01/21/2010 - 03:18

how the mini dancer 2 compared to the cp-8871? right now I have Be-718, and now I can't decide which is the best way to upgrade, is it Mini dancer 2 or 8871 or I just add a sub like Rel or JL Audio Fathom series. it is because I can't go to hear them

Chris Martens -- Thu, 01/21/2010 - 10:21

mcawaw,

Let me address your several questions as best I can.

1) The Be-718 is, and in my book always will be, a great speaker and a great value. That said, my opinion--and it is only that--is that it is tricky to add subs to speakers that good without introducing at least some problems with textural discontinuities down low.

2) The original Mini Dancer 2 is voiced a bit differently than the BE-718, offering a slightly more distant perspective on the music/soundstage, but with greater bass extension and a broader dynamic envelope.

3) I don't have a lot of experience with the CP-8871 (I'm more familiar with the CP-8571). That said, my past experience with various Usher models that use dual woofers (e.g., the mighty BE-20) is that they are geared to sound best in very large rooms. The dual woofers, I think, can easily over-drive small-to-mid-size spaces.

4) Here's an alternative to consider: the just-announced-at-CES 2010 Usher Dancer Mini 2 Diamond (note the slightly "inverted" naming nomenclature). This is essentially a variation on (and in my view, a potentially significant step forward from) the original Mini Dancer 2. Here are the changes, to the best of my knowledge. First, the original Be-style tweeter has been replaced with a new "Diamond" series tweeter that uses an exotic metal dome (the alloy, I'm told, includes titanium, aluminum, magnesium, and a very tiny amount of beryllium) that is treated on both its front and back sides with a stiff "diamond-like" carbon coating. Second, the internal cabinet bracing has been improved. Third, the original wooden floor plinth has been replaced with a gorgeous cast iron piece (finished in matte black) and equipped with greatly improved floor spikes. I haven't reviewed the speaker, of course, but my initial impressions were very favorable; the Mini 2 Diamond does everything the original Mini 2 did, but sounds even more open and transparent, with somewhat tighter bass. I also think the Diamond version more closely matches the voicing of the original Be-718 (although there is now a Diamond version of that speaker, too).

Best,

Chris Martens

Chris Martens
Editor, Playback
playback.avguide.com 

chris.gossard@g... -- Thu, 01/21/2010 - 23:30

A new improved model? That sucks...I've had mine for just more than a month and am still waiting for the BE-616 center channel speaker to go with the Dancer Mini 2s..do you know when the new version will be available and do you know if the BE-616 center channel speaker will also have a diamond version?

Chris Martens -- Fri, 01/22/2010 - 09:26

chris.gossard

Let me respond to your questions as best I can.

1) I'm not 100% certain of the availability date for the new Diamond-series models, though I assume it will be fairly soon since Usher was talking about the possibility of review samples becoming available in the fairly near term.

2) Yes, there will be a BE-616 Diamond version.

3) I believe Usher intends to make available to current BE-series speaker owners its new DMD "Diamond" tweeters, which, as I understand it, are a drop-in replacement for the original Be tweeters (i.e., supposedly the Diamond-series tweeter do not require any crossover network changes). To explore that option, contact Usher USA: info [at] musikmatters [dot] com

Best,

Chris Martens

Chris Martens
Editor, Playback
playback.avguide.com