PLAYBACK 23: Shure SRH840 Professional Monitoring Headphones
High-End Ear Openers, Extraordinaire
Home Theater/Multichannel Audio
- PLAYBACK 23: Onkyo TX-SR607 A/V Receiver
- PLAYBACK 23: Parasound P7 Multichannel Preamp & Marantz AV8003 A/V Pre-Tuner
Portable/PC Audio
- PLAYBACK 23: Shure SRH840 Professional Monitoring Headphones
- PLAYBACK 23: Ultrasone Edition 8 Headphones
TV / Displays
- PLAYBACK 23: LG 55LH90 LCD HDTV with LED Backlighting
- PLAYBACK 23: Samsung SP-A900B 1080p DLP projector
Two-Channel Audio
Source: Playback
To evaluate the Shure’s bass performance, I played the very demanding third (“Landscape: Lento”) movement of Vaughan Williams’ Sinfonia antartica [Bakels, Bournemouth; Naxos], which features tympani, concert bass drums, and a pipe organ. I have heard this recording many times through superb full-range loudspeakers and through systems equipped with world-class subwoofer, but I don’t think I’ve ever heard it better rendered than through the SRH840s. Here’s why. The movement presents low frequency instruments played both delicately and vigorously and at high and low volume levels, in the process exposing listeners to a very wide range of bass timbres and pitches. Speakers often have a hard time keeping up with the demands of this track and room interactions can be a problem, too. Through the Shures, however, I had the sense of hearing the bass content of the track as it was meant to sound—low key in some passages and almost overwhelmingly powerful in others, yet always with presented in perfect control with clearly delineated pitches, even on the lowest organ pedal notes. This is how bass was meant to sound.
Finally, to enjoy the dynamic clout of the Shure, I tried an old favorite: the track “You And Your Friend” from Dire Straits’ On Every Street [Warner Bros.]. This track, more than many, shows how dynamically compressed most hi-fi systems sound and, in contrast, how dynamically expressive the SRH840’s can be. Through most systems Mark Knopfler’s guitar sounds smooth and lush on this track, but also a bit subdued relative to the sound of a real electric guitar. Through the Shure’s, however, one has the eerie but very exciting sensation of being “hard-wired” directly into the pickup circuitry on Knopfler’s guitar. Some notes are indeed smooth and creamy-sounding, but on others you can hear Knopfler dig in just a bit, making the leading edges of notes explode with bursts of energy. Similarly, you can hear variations in the way Knopfler bends notes, gently pulling some to higher pitches while sharply tugging others upward in a way that imparts a vigorous howl of expression. The point, I think, is that the Shures offer you extra measures of expressiveness that make dynamic contrasts sound vivid and alive—leaving lesser hi-fi systems and headphones sounding somewhat “faded” or "washed out" by comparison.
Comfort Factor/Accessories
The SRH840s feature generously-proportioned, leather-covered earcup pads that help distribute the headphone’s moderate clamping forces for long-term wearer comfort. Another plus is a wide, padded headband that helps distribute the weight of the Shures across a broader area at the top of your head.
The Shures come with a high-quality 9.8-foot extension cord with a bayonet-type locking lug that cinches the cable firmly to the body of the left earpiece. Other accessories include a gold-plated, threaded mini-jack to phone jack adapter, a spare set of earcup pads, and a leatherette drawstring-type carrying bag.
Bottom Line:
Shure’s SRH840 is a wonderful general purpose headphone that is good, not just “for the money” (though it is certainly that), but also in a broader sense. These headphones set a benchmark in terms of value for money. To do better, you’ll have to spend much, much more.
Specs & Pricing
Shure SRH840 Professional Monitoring Headphones
Type: Closed-back, over-the-ear (circumaural) headphone
Driver complement: 40mm dynamic driver with neodymium
Accessories: mini-plug to phone jack adapter, 9.8-foot extension cord, spare earcup pads, carrying bag.
Frequency Response: 5 Hz – 25 kHz
Weight: 318 grams
Sensitivity: 102dB/mW
Impedance: 44 ohms
Price: $200.00
SHURE INC.
5800 West Touhy Avenue
Niles, IL 60714
(847) 600-1212
www.shure.com
- « first
- ‹ previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1999 - 2011 NextScreen. All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.
Comments
I don't understand why you refrain from mentioning other headphones in the review. The Grado line and the Sennheisers are widely known, and provide reference points. Not using those reference points lessens the value of the review.
I'm not asking for a "shootout", or even a "better than" comment. But if the Shure does a great job on low-level details how does it compare, in that regard, to those other two lines? That would meke the review much more useful to us, as readers and consumers.
The thing with Grado and Sennheiser is that they are open ear headphones, sure they give unbelievable sound quality as well but the fact that air can come in, it makes them apart of a completely different category.
Chris,
You have recently reviewed the top of the line Sennheiser and Ultrasone headphones. How does the Shure measure up?
Chris,
You have recently reviewed the top of the line Sennheiser and Ultrasone headphones. How does the Shure measure up?
As has already been said in the first comment, it would be much more informative if you could compare or contrast your impressions against some very well known and comparably priced headphones... In my case I own a Sennheiser HD-280 PRO "Studio" circumaural headphones at $200 but that are available at close to a hundred dollars at "street" prices, and have been quite happy with their preformance/price ratio; but after four years of listening to them, I am considering . The comparable Grado's are also well known. Even when the sensitivity of the Shure's seems quite high, having only 44 ohm could require a headphone outlet with enough current capability, so please tell us with which equipment did you perform your tests. Finally, a side note comparing this model to the "closest but slightly better" models (which I suppose will go over twice the price, could reveal a lot to a prospective buyer. It is very clear from your review that this model offers a great value, but we also would be happy to know how far (or close) are they from the next better models at up to 400-500 usd. When you are seriously considering to buy ANOTHER set of headphones (and having no less than 15 models accumulated over the years), every consideration is deserved.
And finally (and sometimes necessary information): How well does it isolate external noise, and also how much reproduced sound does it leak (as when one wants to go to bed listening without bothering your better half).
Thanks in advance.
I've had a Sennheiser HD280 Pro for 2 years, and I was satisfied with them until recently. Indeed, two weeks ago, I bought the Shure SRH440 and SRH840 in order to compare both, and also to compare them with the Sennheiser HD280.
Report #1 : Both Shures are definitely better than the Sennheiser HD280 Pro. So forget the HD280 for the rest of this evaluation.
Report #2 : Both Shures are very different, but each one has its intrinsic qualities.
Report #3 : It is very hard to make a choice between them because they are both so good, but indeed different!
I am not fixed yet as for my choice between the SRH440 and SRH840, even after 2 weeks of comparisons. The problem is that I really like both, but I have to choose one.
When I'm comparing, each time I put one of them on my head, I fell that it's the best of both. But when I put the other, it's again the best of both!
Here's what I've noted about each one :
SRH440
- Alive, involving, energetic although smooth sound
- Fun to listen, very dynamic, well suited to popular music
- Does very well with classical and jazz too!
- Overall clarity seem better than SRH840
- Voices are more natural, livelier than SRH840
- Snappy deep bass with lots of impact but well balanced
- Midrange is accurate and natural, very live sounding
- Treble is acute, detailed and never agressive
- Sensitivity is fantastic, can play very loud with MP3 players
- No need for amplification
- Comfort is surprisingly better than SRH840
- At 99$ value is outstanding!
SRH840
- Darker, more distant, laid-back sound than SRH440
- Sensation of plenitude, sound texture is dense
- Does very well with acoutic instruments
- A bit soft and lazy with pop and rock
- Voices have a felted quality
- Bass is very deep, but less impactful than SRH440
- Midrange is smooth, consistent and intimate
- Treble is almost perfect, better than SRH440
- Sensitivity is good, can play loud enough with MP3 players
- Would be better with amplification
- Comfort is good, but heavier and hotter than SRH440
- At 199$ value is great
Again, both models are very good and really impressive for the price. The SRH440 is a winner for listening with an MP3 player or a PC soundcard. Since I don't have a headphone amp, I probably can't evaluate the SRH840 at its best.
I echo all the above very gentle comments and would add, more assertively, that to the extent that a review presents no useful information, it is useless.
This review appears to be informative, but closer analysis reveals little useful data. In this case, as mentioned, comparisons to obvious headphone alternatives would have meant something, but providing a list of subjective impressions of replay without direct comparisons to the headphone competition is a waste of everyone's time. This is, emphatically, not serving our interests.
Honestly, you write like a salesman who is subtly trying to up-sell the customer while being careful not to trash the product in hand in case he/she decides to buy it.
In my experience, at this price point sonic variability doesn't have all that much to do with cost. The real variable at this price is construction quality which includes the quality of the plastics used. In my observation, the best plastics come from Germany and the USA. I have seen a lot of Sony's with rotted earpads, but almost no AKGs, Beyers and Sennheisers. Shure might well be good in this regard, too, but who knows?
Do Ipods and other mp3 players have enough power to drive these headphones to a decent volume level or are these headphones strictly designed to be used with other audio equipment.
I just got a pair of srh440 headphones today. On my way home from buying them, I listened to my 1st generation Ipod shuffle with them. I must say YES they are great with an Ipod but I don't recommend driving and listening to your Ipod because it's not safe. I'm listening to tunes right now and loving it. SHURE sure it it right with the Shure srh440 headphones.
Shure (pun intended) I expect to pay a pointless premium living in the Uk, but the pricing of these phones here is beyond a joke. $149 and theyre yours from Amazon.com. Here in the Uk prices START at £170!!! Much as I want these headphones, Im not prepared to have such an exhorbitant amount stolen from my wallet.
honestly mate, where do u buy your gear? the SRH440 is 84 quid at DV....
Erm we are talking about the SRH840, which are priced at £170 from DV.... BIG difference!
Check out eBay, there's a seller from the US, selling SRH840's for 90 quid + postage.
"For $200, these Shures sound fully competitive with ‘phones in the $400+ class"
Big statement. I did a direct comparison with the $199 Ultrasone HFI-580 which sounded better in every way. At $349, the Denon AH-D2000 completely trounces them. I would be extremely curious to know which $400 headphones "don't" sound better than these Shures!!! And to describe them as smooth sounding...please.
The cable is clumsy, hanging from the left driver and heavy. That makes these very uncomfortable to wear. As the sound is concerned they are good for 200$ but since I have Grado 325i as well (1.5x the price) Grado definitely blows them away in terms of the sound quality - and to my taste even comfort.
However the fact that I am keeping both tells you that I am not completely unhappy with Shures.
I use MacMini as a digital source, Quad 99 CDP2 as the DAC, Creek OBH 21SE (pure class A) headphone amp