PLAYBACK 23: Shure SRH840 Professional Monitoring Headphones

High-End Ear Openers, Extraordinaire

Resolution and definition: many headphones in the $200 class are well-balanced performers that generally sound good, but that fall just a bit short of expectations because they somehow lose (or perhaps gloss over) certain essential low-level textural and transient details that could potentially help pull us deep inside the music. But few such limitations apply when listening to the Shure SRH840s. Instead, they dig deeper—a lot deeper—than other headphones in their price class to retrieve small, delicate bits and pieces of musically relevant information.

In practice, this means you hear the edges of transient sounds more clearly through the Shures while also enjoying a clearer presentation of essential textures and timbres of instrumental and human voices. True, the Shures will expose overly “hot” or harsh-sounding recordings for what they are, but on the whole these headphones do a remarkable job of revealing details while preserving an underlying quality of smoothness. Some pundits say there can be “no gain without pain,” but the SRH840s prove them wrong by showing it is possible to enjoy low level sonic details without subjecting yourself to painful edginess, etching, or glare. 

Bass: the SRH840s are exceptional bass performers, combining low bass extension, excellent bass pitch definition, and sheer low-end power and weight (when the music calls for it). I’ve heard many headphones that give you one or two of these bass attributes, but rarely have heard ones that combine all three as effectively as the Shures do. The only caveat I might mention is that the SRH840s exhibit a touch, but only a very light touch, of mid-bass emphasis relative to strict neutrality—a characteristic that, in my view, is musically grounded and that can, on many recordings, enable headphones sound truer to the overall feel of live music or of studio performances.

Dynamics: many headphones, even some quite high-priced models, have a slightly compressed sound that seems to quash dynamics—especially subtle low-level variations in dynamic emphasis within or between notes. I attribute this, first, to the fact that some ‘phones are relatively insensitive or otherwise difficult to drive, and second, to the fact that some ‘phones cut corners on the quality of the signal cables they provide.

But when it comes to revealing dynamic contrasts, the Shure’s enjoy several advantages: they’re very sensitive (102dB/mW), extremely easy to drive, and come with cables equipped with pure, oxygen-free copper conductors (just like those used in more costly headphones). Perhaps as a result of all three of these advantages, the Shures seem, in a sense, to expand the apparent dynamic range of many recordings, making both large and small-scale dynamic contrasts stand out in sharp relief.  

 

Musical Examples

To hear the terrific clarity of the SRH840s in action, I put on “Just Her Weekend Fling”—the first track from Ludwig Berghe’s gorgeous (and pristinely recorded) jazz album Weekend [Moserobie Jazz]. The track feature Berghe on piano and sidemen Daniel Fredriksson on drums and MattiasWelin on bass. The song unfolds slowly, giving each of the highlighted instruments plenty of room to breathe, allowing the listener time to drink in and savor each instrument’s voice. What floored me was the way the SRH840 effortlessly revealed even the smallest intricacies and details of timbre, giving an incredibly intimate view of the performance. I could hear, for example, the sound of Fredriksson’s brushes gently rustling over the matte-textured head of his snare drum, creating an ethereal percussion wash against which the rest of the song could unfold. Similarly, I could take in the crisp, sure-handed percussive beauty of Berghe’s note choices and hear—to borrow a phrase coined by my colleague Jonathat Valin at The Absolute Sound—the “action” of the piano at work (that is, the subtle, almost subliminal sound of keys actuating hammers, hammers striking strings, strings beginning to vibrate, and vibrations setting in motion rich resonances within the frame and case of the piano, and so forth). The effect was not unlike hearing a piano from very close range—perhaps from only a few feet away. Finally, the Shures showed the masterful restrain of Welin’s bass playing, revealing the way he caressed and held individual notes, rather than succumbing to the temptation to overcomplicate things. My point is that the Shures give you an accurate insider’s view—indeed, almost a performer’s view—of high quality music recordings, which is exactly what you would want a monitoring headphone to do.

Comments

chartguy (not verified) -- Thu, 08/27/2009 - 11:35

I don't understand why you refrain from mentioning other headphones in the review. The Grado line and the Sennheisers are widely known, and provide reference points. Not using those reference points lessens the value of the review.
I'm not asking for a "shootout", or even a "better than" comment. But if the Shure does a great job on low-level details how does it compare, in that regard, to those other two lines? That would meke the review much more useful to us, as readers and consumers.

guigui3 (not verified) -- Fri, 10/23/2009 - 10:57

The thing with Grado and Sennheiser is that they are open ear headphones, sure they give unbelievable sound quality as well but the fact that air can come in, it makes them apart of a completely different category.

todd (not verified) -- Thu, 08/27/2009 - 14:14

Chris,
 
You have recently reviewed the top of the line Sennheiser and Ultrasone headphones.  How does the Shure measure up?

todd (not verified) -- Thu, 08/27/2009 - 14:15

Chris,
 
You have recently reviewed the top of the line Sennheiser and Ultrasone headphones.  How does the Shure measure up?

amclaussen (not verified) -- Thu, 08/27/2009 - 16:24

As has already been said in the first comment, it would be much more informative if you could compare or contrast your impressions against some very well known and comparably priced headphones... In my case I own a Sennheiser HD-280 PRO "Studio" circumaural headphones at $200 but that are available at close to a hundred dollars at "street" prices, and have been quite happy with their preformance/price ratio; but after four years of listening to them, I am considering  .  The comparable Grado's are also well known.  Even when the sensitivity of the Shure's seems quite high, having only 44 ohm could require a headphone outlet with enough current capability, so please tell us with which equipment did you perform your tests.  Finally, a side note comparing this model to the "closest but slightly better" models (which I suppose will go over twice the price, could reveal a lot to a prospective buyer. It is very clear from your review that this model offers a great value, but we also would be happy to know how far (or close) are they from the next better models at up to 400-500 usd. When you are seriously considering to buy ANOTHER set of headphones (and having no less than 15 models accumulated over the years), every consideration is deserved.
And finally (and sometimes necessary information): How well does it isolate external noise, and also how much reproduced sound does it leak (as when one wants to go to bed listening without bothering your better half).
Thanks in advance.

Kloug (not verified) -- Tue, 10/27/2009 - 20:12

I've had a Sennheiser HD280 Pro for 2 years, and I was satisfied with them until recently. Indeed, two weeks ago, I bought the Shure SRH440 and SRH840 in order to compare both, and also to compare them with the Sennheiser HD280.
Report #1 : Both Shures are definitely better than the Sennheiser HD280 Pro. So forget the HD280 for the rest of this evaluation.
Report #2 : Both Shures are very different, but each one has its intrinsic qualities.
Report #3 : It is very hard to make a choice between them because they are both so good, but indeed different!
I am not fixed yet as for my choice between the SRH440 and SRH840, even after 2 weeks of comparisons. The problem is that I really like both, but I have to choose one.
When I'm comparing, each time I put one of them on my head, I fell that it's the best of both. But when I put the other, it's again the best of both!
Here's what I've noted about each one :
SRH440
- Alive, involving, energetic although smooth sound
- Fun to listen, very dynamic, well suited to popular music
- Does very well with classical and jazz too!
- Overall clarity seem better than SRH840
- Voices are more natural, livelier than SRH840
- Snappy deep bass with lots of impact but well balanced
- Midrange is accurate and natural, very live sounding
- Treble is acute, detailed and never agressive
- Sensitivity is fantastic, can play very loud with MP3 players
- No need for amplification
- Comfort is surprisingly better than SRH840
- At 99$ value is outstanding!

SRH840
- Darker, more distant, laid-back sound than SRH440
- Sensation of plenitude, sound texture is dense
- Does very well with acoutic instruments
- A bit soft and lazy with pop and rock
- Voices have a felted quality
- Bass is very deep, but less impactful than SRH440
- Midrange is smooth, consistent and intimate
- Treble is almost perfect, better than SRH440
- Sensitivity is good, can play loud enough with MP3 players
- Would be better with amplification
- Comfort is good, but heavier and hotter than SRH440
- At 199$ value is great

Again, both models are very good and really impressive for the price. The SRH440 is a winner for listening with an MP3 player or a PC soundcard. Since I don't have a headphone amp, I probably can't evaluate the SRH840 at its best.
 

Russell D (not verified) -- Fri, 08/28/2009 - 04:10

I echo all the above very gentle comments and would add, more assertively, that to the extent that a review presents no useful information, it is useless.
This review appears to be informative, but closer analysis reveals little useful data. In this case, as mentioned, comparisons to obvious headphone alternatives would have meant something, but providing a list of subjective impressions of replay without direct comparisons to the headphone competition is a waste of everyone's time. This is, emphatically, not serving our interests.
Honestly, you write like a salesman who is subtly trying to up-sell the customer while being careful not to trash the product in hand in case he/she decides to buy it.
In my experience, at this price point sonic variability doesn't have all that much to do with cost. The real variable at this price is construction quality which includes the quality of the plastics used. In my observation, the best plastics come from Germany and the USA. I have seen a lot of Sony's with rotted earpads, but almost no AKGs, Beyers and Sennheisers. Shure might well be good in this regard, too, but who knows?

Audioal (not verified) -- Tue, 09/15/2009 - 16:57

Do Ipods and other mp3 players have enough power to drive these headphones to a decent volume level or are these headphones strictly designed to be used with other audio equipment.

F.J. (not verified) -- Tue, 12/29/2009 - 21:21

I just got a pair of srh440 headphones today. On my way home from buying them, I listened to my 1st generation Ipod shuffle with them. I must say YES they are great with an Ipod but I don't recommend driving and listening to your Ipod because it's not safe. I'm listening to tunes right now and loving it. SHURE sure it it right with the Shure srh440 headphones.

music@hotmail.co.uk -- Fri, 11/20/2009 - 10:39

Shure (pun intended) I expect to pay a pointless premium living in the Uk, but the pricing of these phones here is beyond a joke. $149 and theyre yours from Amazon.com. Here in the Uk prices START at £170!!! Much as I want these headphones, Im not prepared to have such an exhorbitant amount stolen from my wallet.

Smutfist (not verified) -- Mon, 11/23/2009 - 05:27

honestly mate, where do u buy your gear? the SRH440 is 84 quid at DV....

music@hotmail.co.uk -- Mon, 11/23/2009 - 06:46

Erm we are talking about the SRH840, which are priced at £170 from DV.... BIG difference!

Andrei (not verified) -- Sat, 01/02/2010 - 12:40

Check out eBay, there's a seller from the US, selling SRH840's for 90 quid + postage.

alex.vlach@shaw.ca -- Thu, 07/29/2010 - 15:11

"For $200, these Shures sound fully competitive with ‘phones in the $400+ class"

Big statement. I did a direct comparison with the $199 Ultrasone HFI-580 which sounded better in every way. At $349, the Denon AH-D2000 completely trounces them. I would be extremely curious to know which $400 headphones "don't" sound better than these Shures!!! And to describe them as smooth sounding...please.

mdunjic -- Sat, 06/25/2011 - 16:22

The cable is clumsy, hanging from the left driver and heavy. That makes these very uncomfortable to wear. As the sound is concerned they are good for 200$ but since I have Grado 325i as well (1.5x the price) Grado definitely blows them away in terms of the sound quality - and to my taste even comfort.

However the fact that I am keeping both tells you that I am not completely unhappy with Shures.

I use MacMini as a digital source, Quad 99 CDP2 as the DAC, Creek OBH 21SE (pure class A) headphone amp

All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1999 - 2011 NextScreen. All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.