Phonak Audéo PFE 232 In-Ear Headphone & Headset (Playback 51)

Refinement-R-Us

“The purpose of this filter is to provide you with the best quality sound that matches what you would hear naturally when not wearing ear tips. Hearing differs significantly from one person to another, and unlike standard earphones, Audéo PFE allows you to select the filter that works best for you.” (Italics are mine).

Skeptics might at first think the filters are little more than sonic gimmicks designed to give undiscerning listeners the acoustic equivalent of “gongs and whistles” to play with, but that isn’t the case at all. The design thinking that has gone into the filter is much more serious and sophisticated than that, as this deeper explanation form Phonak makes clear:

“When wearing Audéo PFE the ear canal is blocked and the function of the ear is changed. The amplification of the pinna disappears.

1. The natural resonance of the ear canal disappears.
2. That has to be compensated by the earphone, so the target curve is theoretically the open ear transfer function, which corresponds to a flat curve in the free field and diffuse field:

 

The earphones must recreate these phenomena for the user to perceive a natural sound. Since each person has a different ear, the compensation curves should be different from one person to the other. Standard earphones do not take these factors into account, which makes Audéo PFE unique.

Internal studies at Phonak have shown that most people are not comfortable with a sound from an earphone that reproduces exactly the curve of a standard open ear. The curves of Audéo PFE are a compromise between a frequency response that includes the full open ear gain compensation as well as one that has bass and treble predominance.”

 

Accordingly, Phonak offers three color-coded types of passive audio filters:

• Black filters, which are said to “provide stronger bass and treble” (and that, on paper, offer what may be the most accurate tonal balance overall).
• Gray filters, which are said to “provide stronger middle tones” (and that vie with the Black filters for most accurate sound overall).
• Green filters, which are said to “provide stronger bass while still maintaining high-quality midrange.”

The PFE 232 ships with one set of Gray filters installed and comes with a filter changing tool and a filter pack that includes a spare set of Black and Green filters so that listeners can experiment with all three filter types to see which ones work best for them.

The theme of flexibility also carries over into more functional and practical day-to-day aspects of the earphone.

• The PFE 232 can be configured as an earphone/headset, complete with an included iPhone-compatible three-button mic/remote. The PFE 232 is fitted with this cable when it first arrives.
• However, with the needs and interests of sonic purists in mind, the PFE 232 can also be set up as a pure earphone (sans the inline mic/remote module) via an included straight-line signal cable.
• To address the fact that the PFE 232 comes with an extensive set of accessories, the earphone/headset comes with cleverly designed two-chamber, zipper-closure carrying pouch with one section for accessories and a separate section for the earphones themselves. This isn’t an entirely new idea, but Phonak has executed it beautifully; it’s great to have a secure place to keep all the “goodies” while still having easy access to the ‘phones.

Sound Quality: Here we see the area where the PFE 232 differs most sharply from the PFE 122. The PFE 232 features:

• A two-way design featuring dual balanced armature-type drivers, which are said to help improve overall sonic resolution, balance, nuance and detail.
• A choice of two high quality, detachable, user-replaceable signals cables—one fitted with a made-for-iPhone remote/mic module, and the other without. To be clear, the train of thought is that, under some circumstances, the presence of the mic/remote module might in some small ways negatively impact sonic clarity and purity, and that it therefore makes sense to give listeners a straight-line cable option.

 

SONIC CHARACTER

The PFE 232 is similar in sonic character to already very good PFE 122, but not identical, as we’ll discuss below. As with the PFE 122 it is important to bear in mind that the PFE 232 doesn’t have just one set of voicing characteristics, but rather has three distinctly different characters—depending on which sets of passive audio filters are installed. I found that the PFE 232 responds to the various Phonak filter types in much the same way the PFE 122 did, though the 232’s underlying “core sound” is just enough different from the 122’s that it is worth doing a re-evaluation.

Comments

agb -- Fri, 11/18/2011 - 16:07

Actually nothing. Where are the comparisons to top flight earbuds, UE's, Shure 535s, Monster Coppers, or the best headphones, Audez'e?

Personally I cannot relate this review to anything.

Perhaps some day soon we'll be enlightened?

Chris Martens -- Fri, 12/02/2011 - 13:00

Greetings agb, and thanks for your comment. Your point is fairly taken. Here's my take on things.

I would place the PFE 232 in the very top-tier of universal fit earphones, and in that same general category I would also place the Shure SE535, the Westone TrueFit 4, and (provisionally) the Monster Coppers. All things considered, I regard the PFE 232 a personal favorite within that group, though your mileage might vary. The reason why I'm drawn to the PFE 232 involves that "ceilings unlimited" quality I mentioned in the review. With many earphones you'll hear sonic improvements as you step up through various grades of amplifiers until you reach a certain point where it appears that you have essentially "maxxed out" the sonic potential of the earphone. Above that point, amplifier/source improvements don't seem to buy you much as the earphones, themselves, have become the limiting factors. But that's not what happens with the PFE 232; as you improve ancillary components it just keeps sounding better and better and better, which I find very impressive and quite rewarding.

Note, however, that the perceived sonic excellence of the PFE 232's is very much dependent on ancillary gear. If you only ever drove the PFE 232 directly from an iPod, you might feel it offered only small, incremental benefits vis-a-vis the PFE 122's or other mid-priced earphones. From that frame of reference you might reasonably conclude that the PFE 232 doesn't offer very good return on investment (i.e., it costs a lot more than mid-priced models, but seemingly sounds only a small bit better). But once you start that upward progression through better amps (and sources), the true potential of the PFE 232 is revealed, as you discover it has quite a lot more performance headroom or "upside" than its supposed peers.

For me, one eye opener came when I switched back and forth between favorite custom fit in-ear monitors and the PFE 232. Normally, it has been my experience that even the best universal fit earphones pale in comparison to good custom fit monitors, but with the PFE 232's I found that wasn't the case. On the contrary, the PFE 232's fared quite well in comparison with custom fit designs, though I did and do think the custom fit models enjoy an undeniable edge in terms of overall noise isolation.
__________
I won't try to compare the PFE 232 to full-size headphones, since I find that earphones and headphones typically offer very different listening experiences. For example, compared to the PFE 232's both the Audeze LCD-2 and HiFiMAN HE-6 sound terrific (arguably even better than the PFE 232), but are very much harder to drive, provide far less noise isolation, and are not really what I would consider to be viable portable listening devices (because they're just plain big). So, from where I sit the two classes of products are really designed for entirely different listening applications.

Best, Chris Martens

Chris Martens
Editor, Avguide.com/Playback/The Perfect Vision 

Spurt -- Sun, 12/04/2011 - 10:08

First of all - fantastic review, really enjoyed your thoughts on the PFE 232s.

I owned a pair of PFE 012s and I've just got my hands of these 232s. I've listened to them for about 4-5 days now and I'm just blown away by how good they are. Even straight out of my iPod classic they sound fantastic. When amped up, they continue to get better; which leads me onto your point about this IEMs 'ceiling.' You make a quite brilliant point here - herein lies the difference between this pair of IEMs and others in the so-called 'top tier.' I look forward to more of your reviews!

easrs -- Tue, 12/27/2011 - 09:26

So is your review based on using those two amps? Personally i do not find carrying amps for portable listening very appealing. How do they perform straight out of a mp3 player? I see that one would be missing some of its sonic potentials but do they still sound one of the best among the universals? Would you say they are an upgrade from some of the high-ends universals like W4 or SE535?

Chris Martens -- Tue, 12/27/2011 - 11:07

Hi easrs,

I listened to the PFE 232 pretty extensively both with and without portable amps. While the 232 sounds very good directly from an iPod, I would say that an awful lot of its potential is masked by limitations inherent to the iPod itself--limitations that of course are lifted (to a large extent) when you listen through a good LOD cable connected to a high quality outboard amp.

I would say the W4, SE535 and PFE 232 would make a good "Top 3" to evaluate, though which to choose would be up to you. How you feel about the PFE 232 will have much to do with whether you find one of its three voicing filters to be a good match for your perception of what natural or accurate sound should be. One thing I think you will find very impressive though, is the PFE 232's ability to resolve very low-level details and sonic information--an area where I consider it to be one of the best in-ears I've yet heard.

Chris Martens
Editor, Avguide.com/Playback/The Perfect Vision 

easrs -- Tue, 12/27/2011 - 13:03

That was quick! Thanks for the reply. I will try them out.

agb -- Tue, 12/27/2011 - 18:49

Appreciate the comps.

All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1999 - 2011 NextScreen. All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.