Phonak Audéo PFE 232 In-Ear Headphone & Headset (Playback 51)

Refinement-R-Us

 

The Swiss firm Phonak is widely recognized as one of the world’s largest and most respected developers of hearing improvement technologies and devices, with decades of experience in the field. Lately, however, the firm’s strategic thinkers have reasoned that there are many possible roads to “hearing improvement” and that one of them involves expanding beyond building remedial hearing products to instead create extremely high-quality music-oriented earphones. Hence, the advent of Phonak’s rapidly-evolving family of Audéo Perfect Fit Earphones, which are now being offered in three different price classes.

In Playback 42 I favorably reviewed the $179 Audéo PFE 122, which was at the time Phonak’s top model—a model that immediately found favor with the Playback team and quickly earned a reputation as one of the best mid-priced earphones available. Now, however, Phonak has announced a new and much more ambitious flagship model called the Audéo PFE 232 ($599), which is the subject of this review. Given how good the 122 was and is, several questions spring to mind. First, are the PFE 232s really better than the 122s? (We don’t mean to sound skeptical, but the 122 set the performance bar awfully high.). Second, in what ways is the PFE 232 different from the 122, and why? Third, can the PFE 232 match the 122 in terms of offering great value for money? We’ll touch on all these questions in this review.

 

 

FEATURES/PRODUCT CONCEPT

In a positioning statement on its Audéo world Web site (www.audeoworld.com), Phonak explains its transition into the world of earphones in this way:

“Thanks to decades of experience, Phonak has extensive knowledge of the ear in terms of acoustics and of comfort. With our Audéo Perfect Fit Earphones, our extensive knowledge now helps music lovers enjoy an exceptional listening experience.”

The key here, as I have learned through many conversations with Phonak representatives, is that the firm defines “an exceptional listening experience” in three specific ways: fit, flexibility, and sound quality.

Fit: Phonak understands in a profound way that wearer comfort and ease of use are—and should be—essential ingredients in any successful earphone design. With this thought in mind, the firm has leveraged its many years of experience in hearing aid design (and its extensive database on human ear sizes and shapes) in creating a light, compact and uncannily “right-sized” earpiece design that many listeners should find easy to handle and to wear. You would think these factors would be givens for all earphone makers, but they’re not; indeed, fit and feel are areas where many otherwise good earphone designs fail or fall short. But Phonak knows what it is doing and has paid careful attention to details, offering features as noted below:

• Light and compact earpiece body that is designed to fit an extremely wide range of ear sizes and shapes. By design, the earpiece body provides a just-right amount of offset between the sound outlet tube (the tube that directs sound into the wearer’s ear canals) and the outer housing of the earpiece. By design, the earpiece housing rests close to the folds of the outer ear, but typically does not chafe against them. Further, the shape of the earpiece is thin, gently curved, and easy to grasp, making it easy to insert the earphones or to adjust them on-the-fly.
• In the PFE 232, the earpiece housing provides click-fit sockets for the earphone’s detachable, user-replaceable signal cables (we’ll discuss these further under “Sound Quality,” below).
• The PFE 232 comes with two distinctly different types of ear tips: bell-shaped silicone ear tips (sizes S, M, and L) and dome-shaped Comply-brand compressible foam ear tips (sizes S, M, and L). Phonak points out that the silicone tips “are washable and better for use during exercise,” while the Comply tips “are better at filtering out ambient noise, making them the best choice for travel or use in noisy environments.”
• The PFE 232 also ships with a set of silicone ear guides that route the earphone’s signal cables up and over the wearer’s ears, and are said to ensure a “perfect fit and reduced cable noise.”

Flexibility: The influence of Phonak’s long experience in the hearing-aid field can be seen in one very interesting design detail: namely, the use of passive audio filters that help shape the earphone’s response curves to match user’s ear characteristics and also listening tastes. This is a feature the PFE 122 and 232 have in common along with other Phonak Audéo models. Phonak explains the purpose of its acoustic filters in this way:

Comments

agb -- Fri, 11/18/2011 - 16:07

Actually nothing. Where are the comparisons to top flight earbuds, UE's, Shure 535s, Monster Coppers, or the best headphones, Audez'e?

Personally I cannot relate this review to anything.

Perhaps some day soon we'll be enlightened?

Chris Martens -- Fri, 12/02/2011 - 13:00

Greetings agb, and thanks for your comment. Your point is fairly taken. Here's my take on things.

I would place the PFE 232 in the very top-tier of universal fit earphones, and in that same general category I would also place the Shure SE535, the Westone TrueFit 4, and (provisionally) the Monster Coppers. All things considered, I regard the PFE 232 a personal favorite within that group, though your mileage might vary. The reason why I'm drawn to the PFE 232 involves that "ceilings unlimited" quality I mentioned in the review. With many earphones you'll hear sonic improvements as you step up through various grades of amplifiers until you reach a certain point where it appears that you have essentially "maxxed out" the sonic potential of the earphone. Above that point, amplifier/source improvements don't seem to buy you much as the earphones, themselves, have become the limiting factors. But that's not what happens with the PFE 232; as you improve ancillary components it just keeps sounding better and better and better, which I find very impressive and quite rewarding.

Note, however, that the perceived sonic excellence of the PFE 232's is very much dependent on ancillary gear. If you only ever drove the PFE 232 directly from an iPod, you might feel it offered only small, incremental benefits vis-a-vis the PFE 122's or other mid-priced earphones. From that frame of reference you might reasonably conclude that the PFE 232 doesn't offer very good return on investment (i.e., it costs a lot more than mid-priced models, but seemingly sounds only a small bit better). But once you start that upward progression through better amps (and sources), the true potential of the PFE 232 is revealed, as you discover it has quite a lot more performance headroom or "upside" than its supposed peers.

For me, one eye opener came when I switched back and forth between favorite custom fit in-ear monitors and the PFE 232. Normally, it has been my experience that even the best universal fit earphones pale in comparison to good custom fit monitors, but with the PFE 232's I found that wasn't the case. On the contrary, the PFE 232's fared quite well in comparison with custom fit designs, though I did and do think the custom fit models enjoy an undeniable edge in terms of overall noise isolation.
__________
I won't try to compare the PFE 232 to full-size headphones, since I find that earphones and headphones typically offer very different listening experiences. For example, compared to the PFE 232's both the Audeze LCD-2 and HiFiMAN HE-6 sound terrific (arguably even better than the PFE 232), but are very much harder to drive, provide far less noise isolation, and are not really what I would consider to be viable portable listening devices (because they're just plain big). So, from where I sit the two classes of products are really designed for entirely different listening applications.

Best, Chris Martens

Chris Martens
Editor, Avguide.com/Playback/The Perfect Vision 

Spurt -- Sun, 12/04/2011 - 10:08

First of all - fantastic review, really enjoyed your thoughts on the PFE 232s.

I owned a pair of PFE 012s and I've just got my hands of these 232s. I've listened to them for about 4-5 days now and I'm just blown away by how good they are. Even straight out of my iPod classic they sound fantastic. When amped up, they continue to get better; which leads me onto your point about this IEMs 'ceiling.' You make a quite brilliant point here - herein lies the difference between this pair of IEMs and others in the so-called 'top tier.' I look forward to more of your reviews!

easrs -- Tue, 12/27/2011 - 09:26

So is your review based on using those two amps? Personally i do not find carrying amps for portable listening very appealing. How do they perform straight out of a mp3 player? I see that one would be missing some of its sonic potentials but do they still sound one of the best among the universals? Would you say they are an upgrade from some of the high-ends universals like W4 or SE535?

Chris Martens -- Tue, 12/27/2011 - 11:07

Hi easrs,

I listened to the PFE 232 pretty extensively both with and without portable amps. While the 232 sounds very good directly from an iPod, I would say that an awful lot of its potential is masked by limitations inherent to the iPod itself--limitations that of course are lifted (to a large extent) when you listen through a good LOD cable connected to a high quality outboard amp.

I would say the W4, SE535 and PFE 232 would make a good "Top 3" to evaluate, though which to choose would be up to you. How you feel about the PFE 232 will have much to do with whether you find one of its three voicing filters to be a good match for your perception of what natural or accurate sound should be. One thing I think you will find very impressive though, is the PFE 232's ability to resolve very low-level details and sonic information--an area where I consider it to be one of the best in-ears I've yet heard.

Chris Martens
Editor, Avguide.com/Playback/The Perfect Vision 

easrs -- Tue, 12/27/2011 - 13:03

That was quick! Thanks for the reply. I will try them out.

agb -- Tue, 12/27/2011 - 18:49

Appreciate the comps.

All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1999 - 2011 NextScreen. All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.