.jpg)
Naim Audio never made a DAC, in the same way that it never made a CD player. In other words, it doesn’t bring out a product just to fill a range or even because it’s fashionable to do so. It brings out a product because it can finally add something substantial to the line-up. Which is why Naim Audio has its first DAC.
The development of the DAC shows just how much commitment the company has to its future. This is a product designed to bring out the best in its computer-side sources (such as the HDX hard disk player tested last year, or with a plug in drive, any passing PC or Mac or even the much-loved and much-under-rated Squeezebox). That it can be used with a CD transport or an existing Naim CD player is almost a secondary consideration.
The DAC itself uses a pair of PCM1704K chips by Burr-Brown, a regular feature in Naim players. But before the data makes it to the DAC itself, the datastream is read into a SHARC DSP that acts as data receiver, filter for out-of-band artefacts and acts as a 40bit, 16x oversampler and a buffer. This is aided by a tin of salmon and a Blackfin DSP chip, which controls both USB and the DAC, and a reclocking gate circuit directly prior to the DAC chip (I’m lying about the tin of salmon). It’s also the first high-end DAC with an Apple Authentication Chip, meaning it will talk to iPods and iPhones.
Cleverly, the DAC makes jitter a thing of the past, without resorting to asynchronous sample-rate conversion. Instead, it references the datastream to one of 10 fixed frequencies and the SHARC chip picks out the right oscillator to clock-lock the signal. If the signal doesn’t fit one of those 10 frequencies, then it falls back on ASRC. Naim did this by hiring a pair of the sharpest-tool-in-the-box mathematicians to write some extremely elegant code.
The key thing to the DAC is its simplicity, inside and out. That being said, the five buttons on the front make it one of the most button-heavy DAC out there. These can work to control the files on a USB thumb drive, or select one of eight S/PDIF and additional USB digital inputs on the rear panel. The DAC’s big feather in its cap (aside from the uniqueness of it being the first DAC from hitherto DAC-deniers Naim) is it can handle recordings at a sample rate of up to 768kHz and at 32bit resolution. Of course, you have to ask whether this makes a difference to mere mortals armed with 44.1kHz, 16bit CD files transferred to computer, but it suggests that Naim’s own music label is going to start moving from big high resolution downloads to really big, really high resolution music downloads soon.
But forget the sort of high-res files that only studio engineers can get a hold of right now. How does it sound with regular music, off regular music CDs? Jolly damn fine, really. It’s immediately obvious and recognisable as an upgrade of the first water. It’s obvious because you listen to something played perfectly fine without it, play the same thing with the DAC in place and wonder how you could ever live with the sound you had liked or even loved a minute or two before. It’s more three-dimensional, more detailed, more transparent, more musical and most of all more likeable than before. That doesn’t mean they were ‘nice sounding’; play a piece of music that was rough-edged and it sounds just as rough-edged, but you want to listen to the music more.
A key recording that demonstrates all of the above is ‘Butterfly’ by Jason Mraz. It’s a wry, deliberately syrupy-soul track with some of the most dodgy (and downright rude) sounding lyrics you’ve heard since the 1980s. And on through the DAC, those lyrics stopped sounding like soft-core porn and started sounding like sarcasm. Other tracks were given the same treatment through the DAC. It just gets more out of the music. Whether you flipped between DAC and no-DAC within a single track or spun out whole albums, the difference was clear and hard to live without once heard.
But there’s that other great Naim concept, too – the upgrade path. Adding in a beefy power supply adds a lot more to the performance, although curiously I’d say more in the ‘audiophile’ direction than necessarily the ‘Naimophile’. The upgrade gives even more image space, solidity and separation and could get even the flattest of flat earthers starting to talk about micro-dynamics. The improvement is noticeable and significant, although it must be said so is the hole that added power supply makes in your bank balance. The upgrade doesn’t have to happen at time of purchase and is an easy fit (simply remove the Burndy plug protector and connect in the PSU, the power feed to the DAC remains in use), allowing you to buy a five or even seven grand DAC in stages.
Comments
The Naim DAC only has USB Type A connectors, so you can NOT plug a computer's USB output directly into the DAC. You can load computer audio files, WAV type only, onto a USB flash drive and plug it into the Naim DAC, and the DAC will play back those files, even high-resolution versions. I suspect most users won't find that an acceptable way to play music, so to use a computer with the Naim DAC, you'll need a USB-to S/PDIF converter like the Bel Canto USB Link 24/96 or the M2Tech HiFace to convert the computer's USB output to S/PDIF, which the Naim DAC will accept.
I'm not sure why you think USB type A and B (and mini A & mini B for that matter) are mutually exclusive, but they are not. Of course you can plug the NAIM Dac directly into the computer, you do not need that rather silly Bel Canto device. That being said, if you have an optical out on your computer (Mac's all do as well as most PC's with a real sound card [ie, not sound card built into the motherboard]) then an optical connection is almost always a better way to go. Either way, you are mistaken, you can have a direct connection from your computer regardless of whether your computer happens to have type A (generally desktops) or type B (generally laptops). The different types of USB connection have to do with whether or not you need the USB cord to also provide power - the two extra pins on a type A connection are for this and in the case of laptops, using the small amount of space they have - camera's tend to use the mini type for this reason, they are small devices and don't need the computer/laptop to provide power since they have batteries, the USB cord is simply for getting the info/photo's off the camera/memory card.
The naim dac usb is for memory-sticks and mp3-players like the ipod - only.
To connect a computer you need optical or spdif out, or an external soundcard that has optical (toslink) or s/pdif coax output, like the "M-Audio Transit" or "M2-tech hiFace"
Naim recommends optical to avoid the computers RF-noise etc.
Simply put, not using the DAC, you can also listen to music, using the DAC's purpose is to improve the sound quality, according to our actual test run, now sound like more than we DAC A-1 is hard, of course, we do not have to test those prices times our sound card.
MTS Converter,MTS Converter Mac
I have a mostly Naim system, but I am not against using other great products! I am deciding between the Naim Dac or the Berkeley audio dac. Has anybody done a head to head comparison?
I tried them both together at my house in my primarily Naim system over a weekend and ended up preferring the Naim Dac, but YMMV. I now have the Naim Dac and am quite happy with it.
Mike
Reading the review, you'll see breathless mentions of which $15 dac was used and which $8 dsp was used. If you want to do a real review, do a real teardown. My guess looking at the picture, this unit has a cost of goods less then $300. Where it the remaining $2,700 going?
Design & brand name, dealer & importer markup
But in the end, you decide if that worth it or not..
..
If you are looking for HiFi quality, looking like a Naim audio (be careful, however, the chart
You can find the network, is not entirely correct), diyAudio.com have some good ideas and Leach
Done some good work, Mr. too much.
MTS Converter,MTS Converter Mac