Playback recently received and tested the Micromega WM-10 WiFi Music Streamer ($1595), an unassuming black box that seems to be exactly what a lot of people are looking for (even if they don’t know it yet). The WM-10 was launched at CES 2010 and offers the ability to play high quality audio streams remotely using the Wi-Fi (802.11n) wireless system.
Consider this music streamer if: you want to store your music collection on your computer but play it back on your main audio system in another room, and if you value a smooth, relaxed sound.
Look further if: you want a music client, but value maximum resolution and vividness (and can pay for it)
Ratings:
What Does It Do?
Some people find the parts and pieces of a computer audio system a bit confusing. So, before we get into the WM-10 specifically, let’s review some of the general concepts behind products of this kind.
Products like the WM-10 assume that the customer has (or is willing to buy) a music server. A music server is a device for:
Since a music server can be configured using an existing PC or Mac, almost everyone is in the situation of having a music server. Audiophiles may wish to have a dedicated music server, of course, to avoid competition for resources between computing activities and music activities.

A music server could be hard wired to a D/A converter and from there be plugged into amplifier and speakers or headphones. As an alternative, one could purchase a music client (also known as a networked music player or music streamer). Here we use the term music client because it fits the server-client metaphor borrowed from computing (where the server is the base for massive central data storage and organization and the clients are remote devices for viewing and lightly manipulating data). The music client receives music data streams from the music server over some kind of network connection, then performs D/A conversion, and finally outputs analog audio signals to an existing audio system.
So, in summary, the WM-10 is a music client. It is designed to work with a music server (that is, with a Mac or PC with iTunes and Wi-Fi). The WM-10 receives Wi-Fi music streams from the server and does D/A conversion. In turn, you plug the WM-10 into your preamp or receiver via a stereo analog connection. You control the songs that are being streamed from the server using an iPod Touch or iPhone (or via the server itself).
The WM-10 Design
With the above in mind, the concept of the WM-10 is pretty simple. The first idea is that audiophiles will probably want to place their PCs and audio systems in different rooms. This isn’t some whole house audio lifestyle B.S., but rather an arrangement that is very desirable because PC components tend to be noisy so that the easiest way to nip noise problems in the bud is to relegate PCs and related items to another room. It can also be a practical matter. Audio equipment is often placed in a more relaxed living space in the home than computer gear, which is typically assigned to a functional workspace. The WM-10 is therefore conceived as a remote client.
The second idea behind the WM-10 is that remote clients should ideally be wireless. Many homes are not fully wired with Ethernet connections in all the right places, so wireless connections are simply an easier way to go. One could conceivably use AC powerline networking connections instead, but some designers are concerned about how easily and well this works.
The third notion behind the WM-10 is that audiophiles will want a high quality music client if they want one at all. While the WM-10 starts life as a humble Apple Airport Express, Micromega has redesigned it, making modifications in three critical areas. Micromega has installed a higher quality power supply. They’ve also redesigned the clock circuitry for better D/A performance. Finally, instead of the Apple’s standard Toslink digital output, Micromega has used an S/PDIF output for easier and better interfacing to external DACs (should you not want to use the internal DAC of the WM-10).
Comments
Seriously? $1500? I can buy a Micro-XT computer or netbook for $250 and do MORE in less space than this thing does...and all wirelessly, with the capability to have it on a monitor, too.
I want to send music from PC
to my amp MAC, but spending like
Us300,00 for real good sound.
1500,00 a still
Unfortunately, Micromega WAAAAY overshot the price point at which this would be a useful acquisition. Too bad, otherwise, it's an intriguing piece of gear.
The WM-10 in my opnion has a few drawbacks. One is that it cannot playback the de-facto FLAC file format, due to the fact it is basically an Apple design. The second is a relative premium price:
It is a convinience maybe that it is NOT a PC with fans etc. But as I see it one can get an Asus EEEbox PC with a nice LCD screen and a S/PDIF connected DAC like the Cambridge DACmagic, and still have money for FLAC downloads.
Running the free MediaMonkey player on this PC you can remote control it from your iPhone or iPOD Thouch via the same Remote Control App as one uses with iTunes.
A MediaMonkey / PC based player has the nice feature it supports more file formats than the WM-10. It also plays back all kinds of HiRez files (24 bit resolution and four times the maximum DVD-Audio sample rate. (Of course, not many DACs supports this.)
And, I almost forgot to say, the AAAbox PC is next to noiseless.
Mr. Martin,
there is nothing "humble" about the Apple Airport Express. It is an example of superior engineering design in every aspect (including price). Everything that you mention in your review happens because of the "humble" Apple Airport Express. Micromega adds questionable hacks at best and of course the questionable $1500 price. Did anybody run any tests to see if the performance really improved by adding a power supply and if the jitter didn't get worse by hacking the SPDIF port and the clock? Did anybody check to see even if this device passed FCC certification that the original Apple device passed now that has been altered? And it gets an 8 for value? Really? Did you try to add the price of the Airport Express to an under $1500 external DAC (say Benchmark, Lavry etc or even a Peachtree device)? Would the quality, let alone the functionality, compare? The only audience that I can see for this device is complete Micromega system owners that are trying to keep their equipment stack fashionable.
All in all I find your review lacking at best.
I have a Squeezebox, which seems to do exactly the same things, only mine cost $250 or so. The concept is the right one, IMO -- get your data from a remote server, feed it to a DAC, and voila, you'll probably sound better than your CD player. The Squeezebox does do 24/96 at the moment; going to higher resolution will require higher bandwidth wireless. So I'm not getting the value of this box at all, especially since it doesn't do FLAC.
I just downloaded the IPENG app for my Ipod touch and am loving using this interface rather than the goofy remote that came with the unit. Have you tried this???? $9.99 and worth every penny (if you have an itouch)
The reviewer also made the classic audiophile mistake of not understanding S/PDIF. Both the AEX and the WM-10 offer a S/PDIF output; it's just that one is via an optical cable with Toslink connectors, and the other is a coaxial cable with RCA phono plugs. Seeing as both forms of connection carry the same data I fail to see how the latter is "better".