MartinLogan Motion 5.1-Channel Surround System (TPV 91)

Tiny Hot Rods

In fact, the Motion speakers combine relatively exotic tweeters with conventional mid-bass drivers in a way that allows the whole to become greater than the sum of the parts. And the Dynamo subwoofer gets in on the act too, blending extremely well with the Motion-series main, surround, and center channel speakers. As a result, the entire system is quite detailed and revealing, yet also sounds smooth and surprisingly full-bodied, with very good bass extension and pitch definition.

One word of advice/caution is in order, though; plan on giving the Motion system plenty (as in 100 hours or more) of run in time before optimal sound is achieved. Straight out of the box, the Motion system tends to sound a bit thin, bright, and shrill, but pay this no mind. Just run the system at moderate levels for 100+ hours and watch what happens. Over time, both the tweeters the mid-bass drivers will smooth, while developing deeper and richer bass response as playing time accumulates. In the end, your patience will be rewarded with significantly improved smoothness, warmth and a well-integrated system sound overall.

Should you use the Motion system with an A/V receiver or controller that provides room EQ functions? I found the Motion system sounded quite good on its own (that is, without any EQ) but that its performance could be tweaked for even better sound with a good room EQ system. In particular, I found that the Audyssey EQ system helped the Motion rig “snap into focus” in an even tighter way, while improving overall integration between the Dynamo subwoofer and the Motion speakers. If you do use a room EQ system, you may want to run calibrations once when you first install the system, and then again after break in is complete. Hint: don’t be surprised if you find—as I did—that calibration settings needed for the system can and do change significantly as break-in progresses. 

 

MOVIE PERFORMANCE

Above, I’ve mentioned the rich, full-bodied, yet detailed character of the Motion system, and to experience those qualities in action you need look no further than to the soundtrack of the music-centric, academy award-winning film Crazy Heart. A major theme of the film involves the unlikely development, growth, and ultimate collapse of a relationship between the grizzled, road-weary, alcoholic, and yet also profoundly talented country music musician Bad Blake (Jeff Bridges) and the much younger, single-mom music journalist Jean Craddock (Maggie Gyllenhaal).

What starts out as a series of background interviews for an article Jean hopes to write about Blake becomes something more when, late one evening, Blake turns to Jean with a sly smile and half murmurs/half whispers, “I wanna talk about how bad you make this room look. I never knew what a dump it was until you came in here.”

Jean laughs softly laughs and blushes, sounding both a bit nervous yet also obviously touched and flattered by Blake’s attention. Blake, encouraged by this, grins, laughs, then adds, “I haven’t seen someone that blushed in I don’t know how long.” Jean dips her head for a moment, then coquettishly replies, “Well, I can’t help it if my capillaries are close to the skin.”

The Motion systems catches all of the fine sonic textural details in this scene, letting you hear the alcoholic charm beneath the just-slightly slurred edges of Blake’s words, and the unmistakable undertones of sincere longing behind the bravado in his voice. And just as plainly, you can hear Jean being won over in spite of herself. In this and in several other quiet, tender, dialog-driven scenes between Bad and Jean, the Motion system shows off its terrific clarity, delicacy, and finesse, exposing not just the sounds but also the subtle emotions in the actors’ voices.

But it’s during the live music scenes in Crazy Heart that the system’s bigger, bolder, more full-bodied character comes into play. One of my favorite scenes involves an evening concert at a large outdoor pavilion in Phoenix, where Blake has been invited to open for Tommy Sweet (Colin Farrell), a former sideman and protégé of Blake’s whose career is enjoying a meteoric rise, even as Blake’s is in decline. As the scene opens, you seen an audience member’s view of the stage and hear the loud, overblown sound of the PA system playing canned, pre-show music. The sound is ever so realistic, capturing to a “T” the overblown sound of waves of bass notes cascading forth from the PA speakers and rolling upwards into the inclined seating areas outside. But as Blake take the stage you hear—again, quite realistically—the sound of the PA system change and improve dramatically as well-judged concert soundboard setting, which Blake had worked out with the soundman earlier in the day, suddenly take hold.

Comments

najib.dajani@gm... -- Wed, 07/07/2010 - 18:06

This review reads like marketing copy.

Also, you know better than to use "Frequency Response" instead of "Frequency Range" in the specifications. Frequency Response must has a +/- XdB so one can judge.

Chris Martens -- Fri, 07/09/2010 - 14:22

najib.dajani

One question: Have you actually heard the Motion system in action? If not, then I encourage you to suspend judgment until you have done so. I think you will be surprised (as I was) by how much it has to offer for the money. On the other hand, if you have heard the Motion system, I'd be interested to know which sub-$2000 systems you think are better, and why.

I can name a couple of systems that might be included in that discussion, but I unequivocally stand by my statement that Motion system "is one of the most—if not the most—accomplished sub-$2000 surround rigs I’ve ever heard" (and I've heard--and reviewed--quite a few of them).

Re: Frequency Range vs. Frequency Response. The fact is that both specifications can potentially be misleading (depending on how measurements are taken, and under what conditions, etc.). Even so, many readers like to see the frequency range figures that manufacturers choose to quote, if only because they give at least some idea of each speaker's low-frequency extension limits. That's why we include them.

Best,

Chris Martens

Chris Martens
Editor, Avguide.com/Playback/The Perfect Vision 

najib.dajani@gm... -- Wed, 07/14/2010 - 02:32

I was not commenting on the sound of the speakers, or their perceived value. It struck me as odd that the whole tone of the review reminded me of a brochure.

As for Frequency Range, what you list in the specs is the Frequency Range; so call it that. It is not a Frequency Response.

You probably did not get that from my comment but I follow your reviews and your guide. My first "good speakers" was a pair Martin Logan Aerius and I have loved their stuff ever since.

caballerosensual -- Sun, 08/08/2010 - 11:06

Chris, I have auditioned the ML Source and I'm positive that I'll go this route for my home theater, along with Matinee ctr channel. I'm curious to know, in your opinion, how do the Motions match up with electrostats for surrounds. I've also considered using a dipole/bipoles, however I'm curious to know if the blend of speakers will give me the seamless audio that I desire. Thank you for the reply.

Galajerson -- Tue, 07/13/2010 - 01:14

I get a different total: $1,994.75, still under $2K.

john195 -- Sat, 07/17/2010 - 23:52

Exotic Heil tweeters are unheard of at this price, Nice!

mariuscmorar@ya... -- Mon, 07/19/2010 - 17:55

What would be a good amplification match for this speakers?

I'm looking at Marantz SR7005. Does that work well? Would you have any other recommendations?

Thanks!

mariuscmorar@ya... -- Mon, 07/19/2010 - 18:01

What about the Marantz AV8003 separate amp/preamp. Is that too much for these speakers

All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1999 - 2011 NextScreen. All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.