MartinLogan ElectroMotion ESL 5.1-Channel Speaker System (TPV 109)

Serious High-End Goodness at a Sensible Price

 

MUSIC PERFORMANCE

Let me share two illustrations to show what the EM-ESL system can do with well-recorded musical material.

First, let’s talk about the way the MartinLogans handled the Chicago Symphony Orchestra brass and percussion sections handling of Silvestre Revueltas’ Sensamoyá from Chicago Symphony Orchestra Brass Live (CSO-Resound, multichannel SACD). This remarkable modern composition features the orchestra’s brass section (including a tuba solo), clarinet, string bass, and many of the instruments of the percussion section. The theme, according to Philip Huscher’s liner notes from the recording, is to musically recreate the feel of a Cuban poem about “a ritual Afro-Cuban chant performed while killing a snake.”

Accordingly the piece is rhythmic, angular, and very powerful—at times almost dissonantly so, and yet it also has moments of great delicacy. What caught my ear was both the timbral purity and relative ease with which the EM-ESL system navigated the sounds of the lowest pitched brass and percussion instruments right on up to the highest pitched ones. What touched me, really, was the system’s ability to faithfully capture the diverse tonalities, textures, and orchestral personalities of the individual instruments, while showing how their distinctive voices became woven together to create the sound of the overall orchestral section. You expect high-priced high-end speakers to get subtle timbres and textures right, but it’s refreshing to hear a relatively low-cost high-end system pull off this feat in such an accomplished way.

Tonal balance seemed pretty much ideal, with the EM-ESL main speakers contributing, through their dipolar electrostatic panels, much less in the way of room interactions than I expected. Thus, it was easy to feel myself transported away from the acoustics of The Perfect Vision listening room and into the three-dimensional acoustics of Chicago’s Orchestra Hall at Symphony Center, where this recording was made. Importantly, output from the system’s front channel speakers combined to create an almost perfectly seamless sound that did a great job of conveying in a three-dimensional way the sound of the ensemble arrayed in an arc upon the stage. In turn, the surround speakers, acting both alone and in conjunction with the front main speakers, masterfully revealed the acoustics and dimensions of the recording space, yet without drawing too much attention to themselves.

Yet another fine musical example comes from the Maya trio’s performance of Robert Paterson’s The Book of Goddesses [American Music Recordings, CD]. I wanted to include this recording because A) it is very well made, and B) it afforded an opportunity to evaluate the EM-ESL system both in a purist-oriented stereo context, but also—with surround sound processing engaged—to see how well other system elements matched the voicing of the main EM-ESL speakers.

The Maya trio features Sato Moughalian on flutes of various types, Jacqueline Kerrod on harp, and John Hadfield on percussion. The Trio commissioned Paterson to write The Book of Goddesses, which a collection of nine short, highly evocative pieces that each attempts to capture the personality of an historical goddess, with sources drawn from various cultures and story traditions from around the world. My favorite vignette (at least this week) is the third of the pieces in the series, named for the Greek goddess Aphrodite. I like this track in part because it includes all the members of the trio (not all of the pieces include percussion, but this one does), and because it introduces a light, jazzy, propulsive dance rhythm and beautifully reveals the voices of the trio’s instruments.

Even if you sit down to listen to “Aphrodite” in a casual way through the ElectroMotion ESL system, my bet is that it won’t be long before you get drawn in and start tapping your toes in time to the music. The sound of the EM-ESL speakers—in stereo—is so clean and taut that they make child’s play of capturing subtle variations in rhythm and syncopation. But what is more, they dig down deep to retrieve inner details that capture the very essence of the sound of the harp and flute—so that you have a sense of the speakers having more than enough transient speed to keep up with the attack, sustain, and decay of sounds from each of the instruments, whether heard in isolation or in combination with the others. In short, you have the sense that the electrostatic panels have more than sufficient speed to stay ahead of the music—a sensation that, quite frankly, few other types of speakers can convey.

I wondered if engaging a surround sound processor (e.g., Dolby Digital ProLogic IIx Music or the like) and thus engaging the other speakers in the system would cause the sound to become slower, more diffuse, or to lose focus, but my concerns proved unfounded. When I turned on the surround processor neither the voicing nor the textural acuity of the system changed much at all, though I did note a heightened sense of ambience and front-to-back depth. This suggests to me that, while the EM-C2 and EM-FX2 speakers may not sound identical in voicing to the superb EM-ESLs, they get close enough that, even on a very revealing record like this one, the changes you hear will be small and largely beneficial in nature. The point is that this is one surround system you can trust not only for movie playback, but for serious, critical music listening.

Comments

jameslrock@hotm... -- Thu, 12/01/2011 - 17:57

What source, pre/pro and amps did you use?
Also what is the next step up in performance/price and power requirement?

Chris Martens -- Fri, 12/02/2011 - 16:19

Hi jameslrock:

Let me tackle your questions in order:

1. Pre Pro: Anthem Statement D2V (used without any ARC room correction applied).
2. Amp: Anthem Statement P5.
3. Source: Oppo BDP-95 with both analog and digital audio connections to the Anthem.

Next Step(s) Up: two possible approaches.

1. Staying in the MartinLogan fold, but stepping up to next level: ESL Theos mains ($4995/pring), ESL Motif ($1895) or Stage ($2995) center channel, ESL EFX surrounds ($3095/pr), and same Dynamo Sub as for the ESL system. This solution gives you hybrid electrostats in all channels, plus an arguably more sophisticated pair of main channel speaker, but at significantly higher cost. Power requirements would be similar to those for the ElectroMotion ESL system, though this higher level system will be very sensitive to amplifier quality and refinement.

2. Alternate Dipoles. Consider a switch to Magnepans: Magnepan 1.7 or 3.7 ($2000/pr or $5500/pr), Magnepan CC5 Center channel ($1095), Magnepan MG12 (~$1200/pr), plus high-quality third-party sub such as JL Audio Fathom f122 ($2800). This approach gives you quasi-full-range planar dipole speakers, so that the only dynamic driver element would be the subwoofer. The potential sonic benefit would be enhance coherency and consistency of voicing from top-to-bottom. This system would need a beefy amplifier such as the Anthem Statement P5 we used with the ElectroMotion ESL's, as Magnepan's are extremely power-hungry.

Best, Chris Martens

Chris Martens
Editor, Avguide.com/Playback/The Perfect Vision 

MikeMercer -- Sun, 12/04/2011 - 04:38

Chris-

Now I'm even more pumped to hear these! I'm gonna be writing about them for The Daily Swarm and now you've got me feelin' like a junky waiting for a fix!! I mean, the company/sound has changed so drastically from when I was a kid and Mr. Sanders was running the show - but you can buy these (and McIntosh tube gear, and Peachtree, and Audioengine, etc.) at our local Best Buy store in the Magnolia Hifi area!!!! BRILLIANT.

NICE one, covering these. Hats off...

Andy B -- Fri, 12/09/2011 - 17:18

Chris,

Excellent, very comprehensive review - thank you!

I am currently in the market to purchase my next set of speakers in the $2K-$3K range and after much reading and listening have narrowed down my list to GoldenEar Triton Two's, Magnepan MG 1.7 and MartinLogan Electromotions.

While I love the sweet sounding Triton Two's, I like the Maggies and the ESL's better - they sound even more transparent to me! Where I am having trouble now, is deciding between the Maggies and the ESL's, since I haven't been able to hear them back-to-back (our lone Bay Area dealer for both brands is out of his demo ESLs right now). I think both are excellent speakers, and perhaps I would be fine with either one, but I would really like your advise on which one would you prefer and under what circumstances.

To simplify things a bit, I intend to use an Emotiva XPA-2 as the power amp and a Marantz SR7005 as the pre-amp, so a 4 ohm power load in the case of the Maggies wouldn't be an issue.

Many Thanks,
Andy

Chris Martens -- Mon, 12/12/2011 - 13:40

Hi Andy B,

You've named three of my favorites in that price class. Let me offer some thoughts that may be useful.

GoldenEar Triton Two's: Differential Advantages, Minor Caveats
1. True full-range speaker.
2. Easy to drive well, even with high-quality low-power amps
3. Good measure of transparency
4. Stupendous imaging/soundstaging.
5. Very easy to place for good-to-great results.
6. Absolutely does not need subwoofer support for home theater applications (the subs, plural, are already built in).
7. Not as transparent--in an absolute sense--as the best dipoles in its price class. Some would say, too, that the woofer section is not quite as transparent or "agile-sounding" as the midrange/treble section of the speaker.

Magnepan 1.7s (I'm using these in my home 2-channel system at the moment): Differential Advantages, Minor Caveats
1. Excellent transparency and openness.
2. Phenomenal top-to-bottom coherency.
3. Near full-range presentation
4. Requires considerable time and effort to position properly. Good results are easily achieved, but great results can take a fair amount of trial and error testing. Note, too, that some rooms work better than others in terms of supporting dipole bass. I happen to have a room that's great for dipole bass, but your mileage may vary.
5. Needs very good and very powerful amplifiers to sound its best (I'm using the superb but also quite expensive Rega Osiris integrated amp and getting great results, but you may want to consider that the 1.7 is a $2k speaker that in a sense deserves premium-priced electronics).
6. Needs subwoofer support for home theater applications, but is not particularly easy to integrate with subs. The fact is that the 1.7 tends to make even great subs sound a bit "slow" and "sluggish" by comparison.Thus, the best strategy is to use a very low crossover frequency, if possible, to minimize discontinuities between the sub and the main speakers.
7. Caution: At very high volume levels on action film soundtracks, you can occasionally "bottom out" the 1.7 woofer panel (this doesn't hurt anything, but it sounds, um, pretty 'flatulent' when it happens). The solution is to cross over to the sub at a higher frequency, which unfortunately makes integration (see point 6) harder to pull off.

MartinLogan ElectroMotion ESL: Differential Advantages, Minor Caveats
1. Superb transparency and openness (especially from the upper midrange on up).
2. Does a really good job of blending the sound of its piston-type mid/bass driver with its dipolar electrostatic panel.
3. Coherency is very, very good, though perhaps not quite on a par with the 1.7.
4. Goes as low as (or maybe a bit lower than) the 1.7, and with little danger of woofer "bottoming" problems.
5. Also needs careful positioning and setup for best results. Note, though, that if you read and carefully follow the setup guidelines set forth in the excellent MartinLogan manual (one of the best audio manuals ever, IMHO), the process is relatively foolproof, though somewhat time-consuming.
6. The ElectroMotion ESL is very sensitive to amplifier quality (as is the 1.7), but unlike the 1.7 the ESL does not appear to be particularly power hungry.
7. Also needs a subwoofer for home theater applications. Like the 1.7, the ElectroMotion ESL sounds so fast and transparent that it tends to make subs sound slow and lethargic by comparison. As with the 1.7, using a low-ish crossover frequency helps minimize discontinuities between the sub and the main speaker.
8. Note that while the ElectroMotion ESL is not an excessively bright loudspeaker, it is very revealing throughout the treble region. For this reason, it is not a speaker you would want to use if you have bright/edgy-sounding source components.

Which is better: Magnepan 1.7 or MartinLogan ElectroMotion ESL? I can't directly answer this question since I haven't heard both speakers in the same room and with the same electronics. Both have a lot of merit, so you'll have to let your ears be your guide.

Best,

Chris Martens

Chris Martens
Editor, Avguide.com/Playback/The Perfect Vision 

Andy B -- Tue, 12/13/2011 - 16:37

Chris,

Many thanks for the detailed response, truly appreciate it!

First of all, I totally agree with your comparative assessment of the 3 speakers. And yes, listening to the GoldenEar's, despite their very nice midrange and treble integration, on some tracks, one can hear the bass to be not quite up-to-par. These are great speakers and would have been the easy choice for me, since I could drive them with the Marantz SR7005 itself, but alas, I've now heard the Maggies and the ESL's :)

I like the ESLs a lot, but did hear a hint of brightness/harshness at the high-end...it wasn't the source here (considered "warm" and sounded so on other comparable speakers), so perhaps these demo ESLs were new and after the break-in period, the ESLs treble warms up a bit? I believe this is true for the Maggies also. Regardless, the ESLs still are excellent speakers.

I love the Maggies, of course, but am worried about their subwoofer integration and placement, which may not be ideal in my room. And of course, as you rightly point out, they will also make me spend money on a high quality and powerful amplifier. I had been debating between the "high quality, but affordable" Emotiva XPA-2 and the Odyssey Khartago power amps, but perhaps, these might not be high enough quality for the Maggies - your thoughts here would be very welcome.

Finally, and importantly, I am most interested in your comment that "some rooms work better in terms of supporting dipole bass."
To clarify, can you pls outline a few key characteristics that would help me identify whether my room would be more or less receptive to dipole bass? The more I think about this, I believe room dynamics and placement could likely be the key decision criteria that helps me choose between the Maggies and the ESLs.

As before, thanks a lot for your help and advice on this front.

Kind Regards,
Andy

P.S. I finally get to demo the MG1.7 vs. the ESL's head-to-head at my Bay Area audio dealer this weekend :)

Chris Martens -- Tue, 12/27/2011 - 16:48

Hi Andy B,

Rather than try to answer your questions about rooms being receptive to dipole bass on my own, let me suggest that you contact Magnepan directly to seek advice from Wendell Diller (Magnepan's head of marketing) who has extensive experience in this topic area.

Chris Martens
Editor, Avguide.com/Playback/The Perfect Vision 

jameslrock@hotm... -- Fri, 12/09/2011 - 20:31

Appreciate a recommendation on which in the Martin Logan 7.1 lineup will be a good match to the new McIntosh MC452 450 wpc x 2 and the MC205 200 wpc x 5. I have an 18x20 room and do not mind larger fronts and center. Which match up well with McIntosh? I heard ML at one of their dealers where I compared to other speakers and was impressed. They do not have the Theos yet.

Chris Martens -- Tue, 12/27/2011 - 16:54

Hi jameslrock,

I have heard a number of successful MartinLogan demos that featured McIntosh amplification and a wide variety of MartinLogan models--up to and including the top-of-the-range CLX. So, I suspect the answer will have less to do with determining which MartinLogan models match well with your electronics, but rather will have more to do with deciding just how much you want to invest in a MartinLogan system.

With that said, however, let me suggest that you might find it beneficial to contact MartinLogan and ask to speak to Mr. Devin Zell, who has had extensive experience in demonstrating various ML models and may be able to shed more light on your question.

Chris Martens
Editor, Avguide.com/Playback/The Perfect Vision 

All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1999 - 2011 NextScreen. All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.