But there is more to the Mini Maggies system than imaging precision and soundstage depth, because the system also offers uncannily smooth and well balanced frequency response (from about 40 Hz on up), plus downright mind-blowing levels of resolution and detail. Although I know it will surely sound like an exaggeration, I think I could probably count on the fingers of just two hands the number of high-end full-size loudspeakers I’ve heard that offer as much or more resolution than the Mini Maggie system does, and all of them cost many multiples of the Mini Maggie system’s price. The Mini Maggie system really is that good.

If the foregoing statements sound like wild claims, then consider this. Magnepan has been on a roll of late, so that when our sister publication The Absolute Sound reviewed Magnepan’s 1.7 loudspeaker ($1995/pair) it was immediately proclaimed one of the greatest bargains in high-end audio (frankly, it’s the sort of affordable speaker that sounds so good that it makes you want to race out and spend $20k or so on electronics, just to have components good enough to reveal the speakers’ full potential). Then, along came the even better model 3.7 loudspeakers ($5500 pair)—models that both The Absolute Sound’s founder Harry Pearson and Executive Editor Jonathan Valin regard as arguably the greatest high-end audio bargain of all time.
Now consider this: which of Magnepan’s several world-beating speakers do you suppose the sound of the little Mini Maggie system most closely resembles? If you guessed the model 3.7, your answer is right on target, which is simply amazing. Granted, the model 3.7 loudspeakers do offer certain undeniable advantages, such as deeper bass extension, a broader overall dynamic envelope, an even greater ability to convey soundstage size (especially height), and—of course—the ability to fill large rooms with sound. But even so, when it comes to rendering musical transients, textures, and timbres accurately, the little Mini Maggie system hangs right in there with its illustrious, award-winning big brothers. As Wendell Diller put it, “the thing that makes the Mini Maggie so much fun is that it really does sound like a 3.7 that you can fit on your desktop.” I can’t speak for you, but to me that sounds like a wonderful idea, especially when you consider that the 3.7 often winds up being compared with speakers ten times its price.
As I listened to the Mini Maggie system, it dawned on me that this little desktop speaker system neatly bridges the gap between the appeal of today’s best headphones and today’s best full-size speakers. On the one hand, the Mini Maggie package offers precisely the sort of ultra-finely focused, highly detailed sonic presentation that makes world-class headphones so much fun to listen to. On the other hand, the Mini Maggie system effortlessly does what no headphone system I’ve heard really can, which is to place a large, spacious, well-focused soundstage in front of the listener (as in a live music venue), rather than having the stage unfold within the listener’s head (as with headphone systems). In a sense, then, the Mini Maggie package gives you virtually everything you would want from a great headphone (except, sadly, very deep bass extension), plus something more that really helps bring the music alive.
Are there caveats? There are a few, though it almost seems churlish to bring them up given how much the Mini Maggie system has to offer, and for such a reasonable price. First, note that the Mini Maggie system, like all Magnepan speakers, is relatively low in sensitivity and definitely likes being driven by powerful amplifiers (Diller says users have been happy with amps as small as 25 Wpc and as large as—no joke—1000 Wpc). Next, note that the Mini Maggie system is, for obvious reasons, extremely sensitive to amplifier quality (remember: this is a very revealing speaker system that incorporates a world-class ribbon tweeter). Third, note that while the system can play quite loudly in a desktop context, it does have its limits and will eventually exhibit signs of compression if pushed to really aggressive volume levels. Fourth, be aware that the system’s bass, which sounds terrific down to about the mid-40 Hz range, really doesn’t go much lower than that (most listeners will neither notice nor care, but pipe organ enthusiasts might). Finally, note that the Mini Maggie desktop modules are—like all dipole speakers—sensitive to placement. I listened to the system at a desk that was positioned well away from the walls of the office in which it was located, and in that location the system sounded superb. Still, it is conceivable that results might be less good if the Mini Maggies were positioned overly close to a wall.
Comments
Going to need a lot of desk top and open real estate around this 2.1 system. I'll just stick to my Harbeth PS3's. FWIW...I was a Maggie owner for 20+ years thru 3 different models. Great speakers in the right (big) room.
Review sounds very promising. What electronics did you use to drive them? Did you play computer-stored files? While the price might seem a bit high, for those of us who spend a considerable time with our desktop computers, these speakers could make the experience much more enjoyable.
i bought a few of these Monsoons, at 15 bills is sure hard to put them on your desk, mind as well put $ into the big system, be honest when u really working do u need such a good system?
I find I cant enjoy the music at work only use them to avoid quietness, whilst at home I put away worries any really enjoy!
Then again for the Nouveau riche u need name brand and top of the line thing to aggravate your friends though.
Maggies were also know to be real pigs for power, I had a pair of SMG circa 80s. They're nice but bass kind of lacking then.
Sounds like [well, reads like but yaknow what I mean] this desktop system would similarly perform exceedingly well with a freestanding [not wall mounted] HDTV and give accompanying audio justice to a brilliant video picture. Think it will work with the L & R speakers on pedestals?
The word from Magnepan is that they can be used on stands, but while they've found that they can work surprisingly well as woofer/satellite systems in small rooms, they were designed primarily as near field speakers and they don't really know yet how they'll work out in a range of applications. So they're recommending that if you want to try this, you work out some kind of arrangement with your dealer, because they don't want customers to be disappointed after buying them for an application for which they weren't designed. Also, they say that there are some forthcoming reviews that try them in a woofer/satellite configuration, so you may want to wait for those.
My personal take on it is that it makes sense to wait until there's been more field experience and reviews. Wendell Diller of Magnepan says some reviews are coming that try them in a woofer/satellite configuration.
What amplifier(s) and source components did you use in this test?
The Monsoon brand computer desktop planar speakers + subwoofer go back to 2000-2001 and were developed by Bruce Thigpen of Eminent Technology (based on original multimedia computer speakers from 1995). I'd love to see you do a comparison between the two systems (although the Monsoon would be at a disadvantage since it used a BASH amplifier for the sub & satellites).
I have and love the Monsoons, but I doubt they're in the same league as the Mini Maggies -- no ribbon tweeter, and a ported (or in my 2000's passive radiator) woofer rather than the planar woofer on the Mini-Maggies. Of course, they cost only $200, as opposed $1500, so I wouldn't expect them to. Eminent did sell a higher-end computer speaker for $500, AFAIK they aren't made anymore.
I have the Harbeth P3ESR's on my desk with a full NuForce system/DAC running off my MacBook Pro and can't wait to get the Mini Maggie system, it sounds like a new advance for near field listening, which I enjoy immensely. Great review Chris, thanks
But I wonder what the DAW market is going to do with these. I like the fact that the speakers are claiming to be the worlds best.
http://www.youtube.com/user/imickey503
I was wondering the same thing.
I've read all the glowing reviews of nearly all of Magnepan's loudspeakers. I've never owned one but I'm seriously considering it now. My only reservation is in the areas of dynamics and dynamic contrast. Lets take the Maggie Pups or Minis for example. In a small room would it really beat conventional design from the likes of say Proac Response, Totem, Sonus Faber, Dynaudio, etc. in the areas mentioned (i.e. dynamics and dynamic contrast) ? Thanks in advance.
Not in dynamics. Of course, this depends on the model -- a big Maggie model will outpunch a small dynamic speaker. But dynamics and bass extension are the two areas in which conventional speakers tend to have an advantage over planars.
Bass extension of course can be extended with a sub, so I don't think it's that significant a limitation.
Thanks Josh. WIll planars fry or suffer permanent damage if played loud on highly dynamic material like movies with explosions and gunshots?
Not Maggies, generally the worst that will happen is that the woofer diaphragm will slap the magnets (loud sound but no harm) or the tweeter fuse will blow. It's possible to damage the true ribbon in the most expensive Maggie models (3.7 and 20.7) with amplifier clipping, apparently the speaker fuse doesn't always get that. But for that reason, the true ribbons are designed to be easily replaced and from what I've seen it isn't a problem unless something goes wrong (e.g., clipping). Normally the fuse will go first. Of greater concern I think for movie use is that if you really push explosions and stuff you'll bottom out the woofer, which as I said doesn't sound good. I think for movies, you generally want to use Maggies with a dynamic sub. You can switch it out of the path for music if you find that it colors the sound (it isn't easy to find a sub that matches the clarity of planar bass -- in general, sealed subs are better than ported, and subs designed for music reproduction rather than movies). One possibility is to use the sub in the bottom octave for music and with a higher crossover for movies. It's hard to generalize here since the larger the planar, the more bass it produces on its own, generally each model will have 5 Hz more of bass extension but more important than that more slam. I used to use my Tympanis, which have huge woofers, on movies all the time and they were just great, I didn't want a sub.
So I wouldn't worry about the robustness of the planars any more than I would the robustness of dynamic speakers, the real concern here is whether a give model plays loud enough or low enough for your needs.
Sorry but if you compare DOLLAR FOR DOLLAR nothing play's like a panel, you may not get BIG BOOMY BASS but you will get real true bass panels have enough bass for 95% of audiophiles whe are sorry for the other 5% ( Peter Walker Quad )