Magnepan DWM woofer panel:
• The DWM woofer features a wideband planar magnetic driver that in essence is a scaled-down version of the woofer section of the flagship Magnepan 20.1 speaker.
• Quoted frequency response of the DWM module is 40Hz – 5 kHz, which is remarkable bandwidth for a bass module.
• The versatile DWM is set up so that it can accept either stereo inputs, which is how it is used in the Mini Maggie system, or mono inputs (which come into play in larger Magnepan systems where listeners might use one DWM per channel for added bass reinforcement or system tuning).
The Mini Maggie crossover system:
• The Mini Maggie crossover section is a built-in feature of the DWM module.
• Wendell Diller, Magnepan’s head of marketing, states emphatically that the Mini Maggie system’s crossover design leverages the firm’s latest design thinking as drawn from the company’s two newest full-size loudspeaker designs: namely the award-winning 1.7 and 3.7.
Other important points:
• Given the fact that the Mini Maggie systems sports advanced technologies drawn from the firm’s more expensive full-size speakers and also quotes quite wide-range frequency response, some listeners will inevitably ask if the system can be used as a near full-range satellite/woofer-type system in smaller rooms settings.
• Wendell Diller fields such questions by emphasizing that the Mini Maggie system was designed from the outset for near-field, desktop listening applications—applications where the speaker’s performance is simply spectacular. While conceding that the Mini Maggie “will work” as a sat/woofer-type system in some small rooms, Diller’s opinion is that listeners who want a whole-room speaker system might be better off choosing one of Magnepan’s larger floorstanding models.
• There are two reasons why the Mini Maggie system is best used in a desktop context. First, as Diller points out, the phase response of the Mini Maggie system is “incredibly easy to get right” in a desktop setting, but much harder to get right when it is set up as a whole-room system. Second, the power response characteristics of the Mini Maggie system are geared for specifically for near-field listening, whereas the power response characteristics of the bigger, floorstanding Maggies typically works out better in a whole-room context.
• At present, the Mini Maggie system is offered only as a three-piece system, meaning that the Mini Maggie desktop panels are not sold separately.
Before describing how the Mini Maggie system sounds, I first need to ask you to set aside any preconceptions you might have regarding the levels of performance that can be expected from “desktop speaker systems.” I say this because, in my experience the Mini Maggie system simply tears up the established, unspoken rules of desktop sound, throws them in the trash bin, and start all over again at a much, much higher level of performance than I frankly would have thought possible.
Nowhere is this more obvious than in the sheer size (that is, depth, width, and height) of the soundstages that the Mini Maggie system produces. In the past, I’ve heard fine near-field monitors that offered excellent levels of clarity, definition, and imaging precision, yet none of them have ever really produced soundstages that had the sort of expansiveness and holographic depth you might hear from a great full-size loudspeaker in a large listening room. The Mini Maggie system, however, is different, and shockingly so. When you listen to the Mini Maggie rig on a desktop, you have little if any sense that the desktop modules are even the sources of the sounds you are hearing, because the soundstage you hear is almost unbelievably wide and—on good recordings—tends to unfold in a convincing three-dimensional space that extends far behind the speakers and, in fact, extends far behind the back wall of the listening room itself. No other desktop system that I have heard even comes close to the Mini Maggie system in this regard, and frankly not many full-size speakers can do as well. Granted, the Mini Maggie system may not fully equal the soundstaging capabilities of the firm’s much larger and more costly model 3.7 and 20.1 floorstanders, whose very tall midrange panels and ribbon tweeter do a superior job of conveying the sheer height and volume of large scale listening environments (realistically suggesting, as they do, the size and scope of large concert halls, for example). But even so, I think it’s fair to say the Mini Maggie establishes a new benchmark for desktop systems, and one that I doubt will soon be equaled.
Comments
Going to need a lot of desk top and open real estate around this 2.1 system. I'll just stick to my Harbeth PS3's. FWIW...I was a Maggie owner for 20+ years thru 3 different models. Great speakers in the right (big) room.
Review sounds very promising. What electronics did you use to drive them? Did you play computer-stored files? While the price might seem a bit high, for those of us who spend a considerable time with our desktop computers, these speakers could make the experience much more enjoyable.
i bought a few of these Monsoons, at 15 bills is sure hard to put them on your desk, mind as well put $ into the big system, be honest when u really working do u need such a good system?
I find I cant enjoy the music at work only use them to avoid quietness, whilst at home I put away worries any really enjoy!
Then again for the Nouveau riche u need name brand and top of the line thing to aggravate your friends though.
Maggies were also know to be real pigs for power, I had a pair of SMG circa 80s. They're nice but bass kind of lacking then.
Sounds like [well, reads like but yaknow what I mean] this desktop system would similarly perform exceedingly well with a freestanding [not wall mounted] HDTV and give accompanying audio justice to a brilliant video picture. Think it will work with the L & R speakers on pedestals?
The word from Magnepan is that they can be used on stands, but while they've found that they can work surprisingly well as woofer/satellite systems in small rooms, they were designed primarily as near field speakers and they don't really know yet how they'll work out in a range of applications. So they're recommending that if you want to try this, you work out some kind of arrangement with your dealer, because they don't want customers to be disappointed after buying them for an application for which they weren't designed. Also, they say that there are some forthcoming reviews that try them in a woofer/satellite configuration, so you may want to wait for those.
My personal take on it is that it makes sense to wait until there's been more field experience and reviews. Wendell Diller of Magnepan says some reviews are coming that try them in a woofer/satellite configuration.
What amplifier(s) and source components did you use in this test?
The Monsoon brand computer desktop planar speakers + subwoofer go back to 2000-2001 and were developed by Bruce Thigpen of Eminent Technology (based on original multimedia computer speakers from 1995). I'd love to see you do a comparison between the two systems (although the Monsoon would be at a disadvantage since it used a BASH amplifier for the sub & satellites).
I have and love the Monsoons, but I doubt they're in the same league as the Mini Maggies -- no ribbon tweeter, and a ported (or in my 2000's passive radiator) woofer rather than the planar woofer on the Mini-Maggies. Of course, they cost only $200, as opposed $1500, so I wouldn't expect them to. Eminent did sell a higher-end computer speaker for $500, AFAIK they aren't made anymore.
I have the Harbeth P3ESR's on my desk with a full NuForce system/DAC running off my MacBook Pro and can't wait to get the Mini Maggie system, it sounds like a new advance for near field listening, which I enjoy immensely. Great review Chris, thanks
But I wonder what the DAW market is going to do with these. I like the fact that the speakers are claiming to be the worlds best.
http://www.youtube.com/user/imickey503
I was wondering the same thing.
I've read all the glowing reviews of nearly all of Magnepan's loudspeakers. I've never owned one but I'm seriously considering it now. My only reservation is in the areas of dynamics and dynamic contrast. Lets take the Maggie Pups or Minis for example. In a small room would it really beat conventional design from the likes of say Proac Response, Totem, Sonus Faber, Dynaudio, etc. in the areas mentioned (i.e. dynamics and dynamic contrast) ? Thanks in advance.
Not in dynamics. Of course, this depends on the model -- a big Maggie model will outpunch a small dynamic speaker. But dynamics and bass extension are the two areas in which conventional speakers tend to have an advantage over planars.
Bass extension of course can be extended with a sub, so I don't think it's that significant a limitation.
Thanks Josh. WIll planars fry or suffer permanent damage if played loud on highly dynamic material like movies with explosions and gunshots?
Not Maggies, generally the worst that will happen is that the woofer diaphragm will slap the magnets (loud sound but no harm) or the tweeter fuse will blow. It's possible to damage the true ribbon in the most expensive Maggie models (3.7 and 20.7) with amplifier clipping, apparently the speaker fuse doesn't always get that. But for that reason, the true ribbons are designed to be easily replaced and from what I've seen it isn't a problem unless something goes wrong (e.g., clipping). Normally the fuse will go first. Of greater concern I think for movie use is that if you really push explosions and stuff you'll bottom out the woofer, which as I said doesn't sound good. I think for movies, you generally want to use Maggies with a dynamic sub. You can switch it out of the path for music if you find that it colors the sound (it isn't easy to find a sub that matches the clarity of planar bass -- in general, sealed subs are better than ported, and subs designed for music reproduction rather than movies). One possibility is to use the sub in the bottom octave for music and with a higher crossover for movies. It's hard to generalize here since the larger the planar, the more bass it produces on its own, generally each model will have 5 Hz more of bass extension but more important than that more slam. I used to use my Tympanis, which have huge woofers, on movies all the time and they were just great, I didn't want a sub.
So I wouldn't worry about the robustness of the planars any more than I would the robustness of dynamic speakers, the real concern here is whether a give model plays loud enough or low enough for your needs.
Sorry but if you compare DOLLAR FOR DOLLAR nothing play's like a panel, you may not get BIG BOOMY BASS but you will get real true bass panels have enough bass for 95% of audiophiles whe are sorry for the other 5% ( Peter Walker Quad )