It’s not just the time machine element that makes this such a significant loudspeaker. It’s the absence of malice it presents to a recording. That last line is really playing to those who listen seriously to this loudspeaker; everyone who does will know exactly what this means. It does something to the midrange that is impossible to find elsewhere; a lack of ‘sag’. This is strange, I didn’t know midranges could ‘sag’ and that almost all of them do until I heard what the Q5 is doing, but after spending some time with it, most other midranges ‘sag’. By this, I mean there’s a mild compression to the midrange that makes woodwinds almost blur into the viola and cellos. Trouble is, we’re so used to this, it’s hard to describe because that sound is so much a function of loudspeaker design to this time. Perhaps the best way of describing it is its one aspect of the difference between the sound in an auditorium and the sound of the recording of that auditorium. Granted, compression and amplifier rectification in the recording chain might undermine this slightly, but what’s surprising is this is yet another hidden gem in recordings past and present.
The hardest thing here is to write. Your notepad or laptop keeps getting put aside as you listen into the music. In all aspects, too. Gregorian Chant will root you to your chair just as much as The XX will. Nothing phased the Q5 at all. This upends some of the absurdities that can surround high-end; “some speakers are better for classical or rock”. No, Some loudspeakers are not so well designed as to make their limitations better suited for a rock or classical or jazz presentation. Not here. You could jump from heavy opera to easy listening to harpsichord to folk via death metal and back out through Beck’s Sea Change album.
I’ve already said much about the Q5 on the AVGuide website. Two of the more memorable statements were “this is the best speaker in the world” and “there’s no magic in Magico”. On reflection, I still stand by both these statements, and they don’t counteract one another. There is no magic here, just loudspeaker engineering by the book… except for the bit where the book says “compromise”.
The ‘best speaker in the world’ call is a tougher one to argue, because some might counter with more sensitive, less demanding speakers, or designs that make music sound better than itself in some way. My contention is that if you are looking for the loudspeaker with the most accurate frequency response coupled to the lowest distortion and the widest dynamics around, this is your speaker. Under such conditions other issues, such as its demands on source, amplifier or environment are secondary, assuming the speaker isn’t so demanding that it spends its years in search of better audio components. And under such conditions, this has to be the best speaker in the world.
Magico Q5 loudspeaker
Four-way sealed-box design
Driver Complement
1 x 25mm MBe-1 Tweeter
1 x 150mm Nano-Tec Midrange
1 x 230mm Nano-Tec Midbass
2 x 230mm Nano-Tec Bass
Single wired multi-way binding posts
Sensitivity: 88dB
Impedance: 4 Ohms
Frequency Response: 26Hz-50kHz
Recommended Power: 50-500 Watts
Dimensions (HxWxD): 119x53x30cm
Weight: 176kg each
Price: £65,000 per pair
Manufactured by Magico LLC
URL: www.magico.net
Distributed by Absolute Sounds
Tel: +44 (0)208 971 3909
URL: www.absolutesounds.com
Comments
Hi Alan - i mentioned to you on Whatsbestforum that i just took delivery and saw your comment there, i didn't realize you were reviewing them at this time. i am really excited to hear them (still finishing renovations, but should be only a few more weeks now). can you tell me what cabling and other components you used. btw - i had to hire a crane to get the speakers into my four story walk up. i will be working with Rives to do the placement - hope they bring some strong guys.
I am so tired of your publications so often declaring a new product as subjective as audio equipment being "The Best". Don't you think that this could be damaging to your credibility when a month later a new "best" is declared? As far as Magico M5 owners not caring about the value of their recently purchased $90,000.00 speakers now being worth a third of that because " they were too busy enjoying their speakers to notice"........ give me a break! If I owned M5's I'd be camping out at Magico's front door demanding a full refund.
Often those comments that you are referring to are written as "The best that I have heard", not that the product is the end all for all products, but just that this reviewer has heard. The writer of the recent Vandersteen 7 review is different than this review, so both can say that what they have reviewed is the best that they have heard, and next month I'm sure another writer could say that something else is the best that they have heard. Additionally, I think most readers focus on the details more than the summary at the end, as I know I do since what one person thinks is the best might not be the best to me, and reading the review will give me the details on why that may or may not be the case.
But the M5's were reviewed by JV and the Q5 pre-review is also by JV that clearly states how much better and cheaper the Q5 is from M5. And all of this within a year. I think while all this was in the works I am sure Magico knew about the upcoming product. They didn't create the Q5 in a few months(my logical guess). In an ideal world Magico could have been fourthcoming of an upcoming Q5 and maybe issued the M5 as a special edition product??? I don't know.... but its a tough call...technology and things improve....Q5 and M5 have different designs and it would be difficult to predict before one was produced if one would surpass the other. Also magicos claim that the Q is cheaper because of production costs and inhouse machienes that they just bought would most likely be true. As one of the hottest company in the market right now they have to make profit too. We live in a free market. People can charge what ever the customer will cough up.
"give me a break! If I owned M5's I'd be camping out at Magico's front door demanding a full refund."
Post of the year!
As this is the first time - to my knowledge - that I have made that unqualified 'the best' statement in 20 years of reviewing, I think my credibility is intact, thanks very much.
And as to those M5 owners camping out at Magico's front door, there's a little matter of this not actually happening that gets in the way of your argument and sort of reinforces my suggestion that the only people getting hot under the collar about this are the sententious non-M5 owners.
Alan Sircom
Editor, Hi-Fi Plus Magazine
London, England
editor [at] hifiplus [dot] com
Mr. Sircom,
I did not mean to insinuate that you have lost your credibility. I just think that as an editor of a well respected audio magazine it is dangerous to declare a piece of audio equipment as "the best". There is no such thing.
As far as the Magico M5 situation, maybe the current owners of these spaekers aren't concerned about their plummeting value due to the introduction in a relatively short time by Magico of a new and apparently better less expensive speaker. Magico ought to cherish customers like these.