Magico Q5 loudspeaker (Hi-Fi+ 74)

The world of high-end loudspeakers is not without its drama and controversy. And Magico seems to engender both in great measure. A young and precocious company, fronted by the outspoken Alon Wolf, in some respects it’s hard to imagine Magico not courting more than its share of controversy. It’s worth remembering that the current captains of the high-end industry were once young, precocious and outspoken too, so sometimes controversy is a good thing.

Especially when it’s backed up by products like the Q5.

Part of the controversy surrounds Magico’s recent past. Only a few years ago, the company launched its M5 flagship loudspeaker. That product is still in production, but the difficulty is the Q5 is every bit as good – often markedly better – than the M5 flagship at almost half the price. Far from being received as a company simultaneously pushing the performance envelope while saving prospective Magico owners money in the process, the chattering classes took umbrage on behalf of M5 owners, who they felt were left with a lesser product at a greater price. As ever with these things, people who actually owned Magico M5s were absent from this online grumbling session, as they were too busy enjoying their speakers to notice.

The Q5 is a five-driver, four-way design, featuring a custom 25mm MBe-1 Scan-Speak derived beryllium-dome tweeter, a 150mm NanoTec midrange driver, a 230mm NanoTec mid-bass driver and a pair of 230mm NanoTec bass units. Calling this tweeter ‘Scan-Speak derived’ is one of those journalistic short-cuts, because the reality is there’s more Magico in there than there is Illuminator tweeter, and that also exposes the limitations of the ‘berylium=bright’ idea. NanoTec (Magico’s proprietary mix of Rohacell coated with carbon nano-tubes) gives the drive units all the benefits of Rohacell (almost unburstable, very dynamic) with none of the downsides (distinctive sound, especially in the midrange). As ever with Magico, the speaker drivers are bolted to the back of the baffle; this not only gives clean lines, but allows for the sort of tensioning that would tear many speakers apart. The tensioning bolts on the back of the M series models are hidden from view, but they are there. There are a series of little holes at the rear panel, but they are there for heat dissipation. The two bass units are slightly offset, which helps to cancel break-up modes, and is known as Bass Mechanical Resonance Cancellation.

Nothing is left to chance, and that costs. So, the hand-made resistors in the crossover are a natural inclusion for the Q5, even though sane loudspeaker designers would hesitate to use a custom-designed bulk metal film resistor that costs more than most loudspeakers inside their loudspeaker (in fact, many of the components inside the Q5 cost as much as a pair of loudspeakers, which perhaps explains why surprisingly few people start coughing when they hear that price tag, especially if they hear the speaker first). That dedication to fine detail is common to all many loudspeakers brands and all loudspeakers in the Magico range, but its effect is an order of magnitude stronger here. And it’s backed by good, solid engineering.

Why audiophile reviewers get heated about Magico simply comes down to respect for the ‘no quarter given’ approach to loudspeaker building. It makes for great copy. Take the drive units for example; most companies fall into one of three categories – buy them off the shelf, make your own, or get the OEM supplier to build to your own specifications. Not Magico. Instead it takes the component parts from the best OEM manufacturer it could find, sends them across the world to the best place for key proprietary treatment, and then back across the world to the people who are better at assembling complex structures than anyone else on the planet.

Take off one of those thick aluminium side panels and you are met with an aluminium spaceframe. It’s worth learning how to remove these panels if you have any friends who spent too long playing with Meccano or Erector sets; take off a side-plate (no easy feat – it’s held on with 100 fasteners) and watch their reaction. They’ll notice the 400 or so parts that go into holding the thing together, even if they aren’t ‘into’ spotting the extreme components that pepper the Q5. It’s a bit like leaving a bibliophile alone with a copy of the Gutenberg Bible for a few minutes… they are reduced to dumbstruck awe.

This aluminium skeleton is relatively light, but incredibly rigid and placed under great tension to help it stay that way. The drivers (with their vast magnets), the crossover and the half-inch-thick aircraft-grade aluminium panels add mass. And they add a lot of it; you’ll begin to wonder whether the Q5 is only black because light cannot escape its clutches. The combination of satin black baffle, shiny black drive units and matt black anodised aluminium cabinet – bereft of any Magico markings, logos or even a speaker grille – makes this a loudspeaker of brutal charm. The anodised cabinet can be finished in almost any colour (but not, of course, wood veneers) and the black on black is appealing. It’s like having a pair of scaled-down versions of the monolith from 2001: A Space Odyssey in your living room. Strangely, this works better than you might expect in unlikely rooms, but it is very ‘man cave’; if you share your listening space with someone who has memorised the Laura Ashley catalogue, the ‘none more black’ approach might meet some resistance.

Comments

bherlihy -- Wed, 08/18/2010 - 10:07

Hi Alan - i mentioned to you on Whatsbestforum that i just took delivery and saw your comment there, i didn't realize you were reviewing them at this time. i am really excited to hear them (still finishing renovations, but should be only a few more weeks now). can you tell me what cabling and other components you used. btw - i had to hire a crane to get the speakers into my four story walk up. i will be working with Rives to do the placement - hope they bring some strong guys.

pal1 -- Sat, 10/09/2010 - 09:06

I am so tired of your publications so often declaring a new product as subjective as audio equipment being "The Best". Don't you think that this could be damaging to your credibility when a month later a new "best" is declared? As far as Magico M5 owners not caring about the value of their recently purchased $90,000.00 speakers now being worth a third of that because " they were too busy enjoying their speakers to notice"........ give me a break! If I owned M5's I'd be camping out at Magico's front door demanding a full refund.

chrisheinonen -- Sat, 10/09/2010 - 16:55

Often those comments that you are referring to are written as "The best that I have heard", not that the product is the end all for all products, but just that this reviewer has heard. The writer of the recent Vandersteen 7 review is different than this review, so both can say that what they have reviewed is the best that they have heard, and next month I'm sure another writer could say that something else is the best that they have heard. Additionally, I think most readers focus on the details more than the summary at the end, as I know I do since what one person thinks is the best might not be the best to me, and reading the review will give me the details on why that may or may not be the case.

Sam -- Mon, 10/11/2010 - 15:11

But the M5's were reviewed by JV and the Q5 pre-review is also by JV that clearly states how much better and cheaper the Q5 is from M5. And all of this within a year. I think while all this was in the works I am sure Magico knew about the upcoming product. They didn't create the Q5 in a few months(my logical guess). In an ideal world Magico could have been fourthcoming of an upcoming Q5 and maybe issued the M5 as a special edition product??? I don't know.... but its a tough call...technology and things improve....Q5 and M5 have different designs and it would be difficult to predict before one was produced if one would surpass the other. Also magicos claim that the Q is cheaper because of production costs and inhouse machienes that they just bought would most likely be true. As one of the hottest company in the market right now they have to make profit too. We live in a free market. People can charge what ever the customer will cough up.

SundayNiagara -- Sat, 10/09/2010 - 20:29

"give me a break! If I owned M5's I'd be camping out at Magico's front door demanding a full refund."

Post of the year!

Mr Plus -- Tue, 10/12/2010 - 18:19

As this is the first time - to my knowledge - that I have made that unqualified 'the best' statement in 20 years of reviewing, I think my credibility is intact, thanks very much.

And as to those M5 owners camping out at Magico's front door, there's a little matter of this not actually happening that gets in the way of your argument and sort of reinforces my suggestion that the only people getting hot under the collar about this are the sententious non-M5 owners.

Alan Sircom
Editor, Hi-Fi Plus Magazine
London, England
editor [at] hifiplus [dot] com

pal1 -- Wed, 10/13/2010 - 18:04

Mr. Sircom,

I did not mean to insinuate that you have lost your credibility. I just think that as an editor of a well respected audio magazine it is dangerous to declare a piece of audio equipment as "the best". There is no such thing.

As far as the Magico M5 situation, maybe the current owners of these spaekers aren't concerned about their plummeting value due to the introduction in a relatively short time by Magico of a new and apparently better less expensive speaker. Magico ought to cherish customers like these.

All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1999 - 2011 NextScreen. All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.