HiFiMAN HE-6 Planar Magnetic Headphones (Playback 37)

Stretching The Performance Envelope

The second point, relative inefficiency, is potentially a more serious concern.

Orthodynamic ‘phones tend, as a general rule, to be low in sensitivity. The power hungry HE-5LE, for example, carried a low-ish sensitivity rating of 87.5 dB (1 mW input)—a sensitivity rating much lower than ratings for typical top-tier headphones that use conventional dynamic drivers. The HE-6, in turn, quotes an even lower sensitivity rating of 83.5 dB (1 mW/input), despite the fact that it is equipped with a “super efficient magnetic circuit,” which means it’s not an easy headphone to drive.

In practical terms, there are several things prospective owners should understand about the HE-6. First, the HE-6 cannot be driven directly from an iPod, iPhone or any other low-powered digital device. As New Yorkers might say, “fuhgeddaboutit.” Second, while the HE-6 can be a phenomenally good-sounding headphone, it absolutely requires an adequately powerful, high-resolution headphone amp to give of its best. Lesser amps can, of course, get the HE-6 to product sound, but the fact is that they cannot and typically do not reveal the terrific sonic subtlety and nuance of which the HE-6 is capable.

But take comfort in this: once you invest in an appropriately good headphone amp, the HE-6 will deliver heightened levels of performance that are well and truly breathtaking. In fact, the HE-6 stretches the sonic performance envelope even further than the HE-5LE does, which is saying a mouthful. In the process the HE-6 establishes itself as one of the finest headphones now available at any price.

 

OVERVIEW

Consider this headphone if: you want a headphone that offers five powerful benefits: ultra wide-range frequency response, accurate tonal balance, blindingly fast transient speeds, extraordinary resolution of low-level sonic details, and serious dynamic clout (provided, of course, that you’ve brought a good enough headphone amp to the party). Let me put it this way; even if you’re familiar with the sound of great, five- or even six-figure loudspeakers, there’s a good chance the HE-6 will unveil elements of familiar recordings that you’ve never heard before. It’s that good. Once you get used to these ‘phones, you may have the unnerving sense that almost all other headphones are guilty of leaving valuable musical information “on the table.”

Look further if: you favor light, compact, and relatively easy-to-drive headphones. The HE-6 is comfortable, but also large and quite heavy (about 100 grams heavier than the already hefty HE-5LE). Also look further if you require a headphone that offers good isolation from external noises; the HE-6 is an open-back design that lets room noises through, and that can faintly be heard from the outside when it is playing. Finally, look further if you’re not prepared to spring for a high-powered, high-resolution headphone amp. If you’re committed to using low-powered headphone amps, be aware that there are other good headphones that are much easier to drive.

Ratings (relative to comparably priced headphones):

• Tonal Balance: 10
• Frequency Extremes: 10
• Clarity: 10
• Dynamics: 10 (note: performance in this area is highly amplifier dependant)
• Comfort/Fit: 8.5
• Sensitivity: 2
• Value: 10 (though certainly not cheap, the HE-6 is priced below most—though not all—of its legitimate competitors)

 

SONIC CHARACTER

At the outset, let me say that the HE-6 basically builds upon the strengths of the already very good HE-5LE. Specifically, the HE-6 offer improved extension and definition at both frequency extremes and conveys a significantly greater sense of top-to-bottom clarity and coherency—almost as if you are listening to an HE-5LE whose power, focus, and resolution have been dialed up to “12.”

Tonal balance between the two HiFiMAN models is similar, but not identical, with the HE-6 offering slightly more prominent low bass, and somewhat more forward-sounding upper mids and highs—differences that many listeners interpret as giving the HE-6’s a greater sense of transparency and openness. Other listeners, however, tend to perceive the HE-6 as sounding slightly bright or “analytical,” so that while acknowledging the flagship’s sharply focused and finely resolved sound, they ultimately gravitate back toward the HE-5LE’s warmer, more midrange-centric and admittedly more forgiving presentation.

Comments

donunus -- Wed, 11/24/2010 - 03:28

Ive heard that the he6 goes well out of the speaker taps of power amps. I don't know exactly how that works but I saw it in another site. If thats the case, that is actually a big bonus for these cans for people that already own high resolution hifi equipment. No more expensive headphone amp purchase needed :)

Chris Martens -- Fri, 12/03/2010 - 16:59

Hi donunus,

The HE-6 uses a two-piece cable assembly where there is a "Y-cable" that connects to the headphone earpieces and that terminates (at the "Y-junction") in an XLR connector. From there, you can plug in a variety of amp cables to connect to whatever amplifier you use.

The HE-6 ships with two amp cables, one for use with traditional headphone amps, and the other for use with full-size integrated amplifiers or power amps.

The traditional headphone amp connector cable provides a 1/4-inch phone jack on one end and an XLR connector on the other (which, of course, clicks into the provided Y-cable).

Alternatively, the power amp cable provides two pairs of color coded banana jack connectors on one end and an XLR connector on the other. Thus, you simply plug the banana jack connectors into the speaker taps of your full-size amp, cautiously turn up the volume, and enjoy.

To see a photo of the HE-6's standard cable sets, check out page 2 of the posted review. The power amp cable is pictured on the lower left of the image frame.

Best,

Chris Martens

Chris Martens
Editor, Avguide.com/Playback/The Perfect Vision 

Marcel -- Fri, 12/03/2010 - 14:32

Chris, could you please elaborate on how the HE-6 would compare to a top-flight STAX electrostatic headphone?
Cheers, Marcel

agb -- Sat, 01/29/2011 - 18:30

Latest sampling among nature lovers is a reasonable preference for the Audeze. Many sense an unnatural sibilance or electronic edge in the top and a somewhat hyped reality to the pushed details of the HE-6 - a bit of tuning needs to be done here me thinks, certainly not like the CLSes which I had owned. I don't have any answers, but I prefer what I hear live, a more relaxed, spacious and natural reproduction. There are good reasons though for preferring a somewhat technicolorized reality. Hearing loss and a correction for it?

http://www.headfonia.com/audeze-lcd-2-trio/

They're both great headphones, probably the best at the current level of the art, but my LCD-2 is on it's way. It is, me thinks, the more refined and better built of the two. I ordered it this week. People should give a careful listen to both. I plan to run my LCD-2 from the Wyred4Sound DAC2's preamp out - direct. Direct is more, well, explicit...and anyhow, may be too much for the HE-6's already more aggressive presentation.

Will report back on what is possible or not and on my impressions. Thanks to both Steven Stone and Chris Martens for the reviews of these now becoming-dominant technologies.

agb -- Mon, 02/28/2011 - 00:23

The Wyred4Sound DAC is certainly NOT explicit with the AUDEZE after having warmed up a couple of hundred hours. It is very relaxed, almost tubey sounding, but not warm at all. There is absolutely no grain, edge, fuzz or the etching one may hear with other DACs.

The AUDEZE cans can sound warm compared with others, but not always. It is not warm compared with live music in a good room. Others can be bright next to the real thing. The AUDEZE is full sounding. Full of details, harmony and musical textures.

The top of the sytem as a whole is extended enough, not etched, hyped or bright, very natural and overall the sound should be described as liquid, round and "pure."

The bass is such that it can leave skid marks. Stupendous and earth shaking. I've heard nothing like it from cans before.

The huge benefit of this system is the direct drive to earphones out of the DAC - and a good electrical match with the AUDEZE. With the W4S having a 32 bit volume pot and preamp functions, balance and other features can be accessed from the menu, filter slopes and such, we have full control. From what I understand, the DAC has a very linear class-A FET output stage, highly evolved in its design using lots of regulation, 4 SABRE DAC chips in parallel for balanced output achieving a huge dynamic range. I am awaiting the balanced cable that needed to be custom made for the male XLR outputs on the DAC - this should make another improvement, not as if I'm missing anything.

With this arrangement no additional headphone amp is required - making the W4S DAC-2 a genuine bargain at this price, this DAC is, as is, technically competitive with others costing four to six times as much. It is said that no wire with gain is better than any wire with gain. True. No additional interconnects are needed either. The only interconnect is between the iMAC and the DAC, a one meter NORDOST Blue Haven USB, reportedly the best as of this date. We'll see. At this point in time the system has the best sound I've had here by a reasonable margin. Quite stunning. Steve Stone hit a home run in his review of the W4S DAC-2, and it, in combination with the AUDEZE cans, hit the proverbial sonic ball out of the park.

All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1999 - 2011 NextScreen. All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.