Hi-Fi+: Musical Fidelity’s X-Can V8 Headphone Amplifier/Preamplifier

Hidden Talents

 
The firm footing delivered by the X-Can provides the perfect underpinning to the easy,  open mid-band. Melody instruments and voices have a solidity, presence and immediacy that gives musical performances a direct, communicative quality, a sense of purpose and   intent that makes listening a primary activity; there’s no using a system as aural wallpaper with the X-Can in circuit. This grabs the signal by the scruff of the neck, allowing the music to grab you with equal force. The top end is clean and pretty extended, adding just enough air to the depth and scale delivered by the combination of solidity and transparency across the rest of the range. As a result, soundstaging is remarkably natural, impressive and uncluttered, adding still further to the musical appeal.
 
Of course, the X-can isn’t perfect; far from it – but then isn’t everything? In this case the flaws are to do with a diminution of textures and micro-dynamic detail (although this doesn’t affect the immediacy) and a lack of core warmth, that rob voices and instruments of some colour and musical shape. There’s a big-boned, ruggedness to the sound that favours energy and presence over the finest subtleties of musical technique, the whole of the song as opposed to its elements. In part, that’s down to the sheer integrity with which the musical picture hangs together, but it also reflects that ultra resolution isn’t on the menu here – at least not as long as the X-Can relies on a plug-top supply. But the really impressive thing is that, once you take the requisite care, this little box does so much that’s musically right and virtually nothing that’s obstructive or destructive in the process. It puts the music firmly first and in doing so steps out of the limelight, allowing you to enjoy the music rather than the system.

 
 Writing this (and listening to the X-Can) it’s easy to forget, a constant task to remind myself, that this thing only costs £350. That’s three hundred and fifty of our increasingly worthless monetary exchange units! Currently it’s playing in a system in which not one single element costs less than ten times that except for the feet it’s sitting on, and they  cost nearly as much as the X-Can – and it’s right at home. Is it a limiting factor? No way. Could I live with what I’m listening to? No problem whatsoever – because it does the important things right, and it does them so well and so unobtrusively that you’ll be looking for something very serious indeed (and probably seriously expensive too) to offer a significant musical advantage.

 
The X-Can V8 isn’t a universal panacea. It offers limited inputs; it’s less than elegant in  application and has no remote control (it’s £350 for God’s sake). But in a world where musically competent preamps are few and far between, it doesn’t just offer more music than you ever thought possible for the money, it will set your system firmly on the path to high-end musical performance, because once you’ve lived with this you won’t tolerate anything less.

 
Musical Fidelity’s Anthony Michaelson is nothing if not an old and wily member of the audio manufacturing community. He knows exactly what he’s got here. He also knows that adding a few extra inputs and a rear mounted pre-amp output would remove the objections to the X-Can’s quirky eccentricities, aberrations that only arise from its spectacularly successful misapplication. Add a remote control and it would be almost mainstream. But it would be more expensive too and therein lies the rub. As it stands, the X-can V8  represents a slightly weird, musically wonderful and astonishingly successful route to musical nirvana. It also offers the key to unlocking the musical performance buried in so many systems by inadequate preamplification or passive controllers. Get it while you can; sit back and enjoy the music; wait for the inevitable slew of external upgrades and aftermarket mods. And while you are waiting (and wondering whether those upgrades are actually worthwhile or even necessary) you can bask in that special, smug selfsatisfaction that comes from the sure knowledge that you’ve invested in, and are enjoying, that rarest of all musical commodities, the genuine audio bargain. The X-Can V8 doesn’t just do what it says on the tin, it goes way, way beyond that – and in the process, its affordable price, USB input and stellar musical delivery promises to introduce a whole new audience to the wonder of highend sound. (Some of whom might be under the mistaken impression they’re already there!)
 
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
Type: Hybrid headphone amplifier
– and part-time high-end
pre-amp
Valve Complement: 2x ECC88
Inputs: 1x line-level (RCA/phono)
1x USB
Outputs: 2x stereo 1/4” jack
1x line-level (fixed –
RCA/phono)
Dimensions (WxHxD): 180 x 88 x 240mm
Weight: 1.85kg
Price: £350
 
Manufacturer:
Musical Fidelity Ltd
Tel. (44)(0)20 8900 2866
Net. www.musicalfidelity.com
 

Comments

mj37 (not verified) -- Thu, 07/16/2009 - 12:03

Why would you say "and you have to hook up your power amp to the headphone sockets on the front panel (which isn’t particularly elegant)"...why can't you just use the "Line Out" RCA jacks on the back panel like you would with any other component?

foo (not verified) -- Thu, 07/16/2009 - 13:54

sadly the previous reader is lacking in the ability to read the black and white.
almost didn't bother replying to such an inane question ...
the RCA's are FIXED LEVEL...intended as a pass thu... NOT a buffered, controllable output.
 

mj37 (not verified) -- Thu, 07/16/2009 - 15:45

Sorry I'm so inane...I'm sitting here with my X-CAN V8P right next to me on my desktop, controlling the volume with the volume knob THROUGH THE RCAs. With both USB from the computer and Line In from a CD player as sources.
Got foo on your face, jackanape?
So, again, my question--is there a reason why the reviewer says that you have to hook up the power amp through the headphone jacks? I'd prefer to hear an answer from someone who knows what they're talking about this time....

mj37 (not verified) -- Thu, 07/16/2009 - 16:41

This is quite frustrating...Greg is correct, the review isn't even of the item pictured. But the review talks about the product almost exclusively in its use as a preamp, and the product that was reviewed, the V8, is ***NOT*** the one you should use as a preamp--for that you should get the V8P (the one in the picture), no question. Same price, even.
 
I own the V8P, and I use it as a preamp / DAC (I don't own any headphones).
 
My own purchase decision came down to a choice between the Benchmark DAC1 Pre ($1,595 from Benchmark) and the Musical Fidelity X-CAN V8P ($499 from Audio Advisor). Both units have approximately the same functionality as a preamp: a built-in USB DAC, two headphone jacks, and one line in for an additional input. My decision was undoubtedly influenced by the price, but, as I read the reviews, the emphases of the two units seem to be flipped. The Benchmark has an outstanding, oversampling DAC and is pretty good but not stellar as a line stage through its one "Pre" input. The MF, by contrast, has non-oversampling USB DAC that is pretty good but not stellar, and is fabulous as a line stage preamp for its one input. My decision was based on how I want to use the unit: I listen to MP3's and Apple Lossless files from the computer maybe 80-85% of the time (I work at home), but relatively few of the 8,000 or so music files I have are even as high res as standard Red Book CD spec. So I'm getting a new turntable and will use the V8P as the preamp for my phono setup, which will be the highest audio quality I will have in my system.
 
For some reason, Musical Fidelity is almost hiding the fact that the V8P has a USB DAC in it. But it does. In fact, when I bought mine, Audio Advisor was erroneously advertising the V8P as having an oversampling DAC section, which it does not have. I've been so pleased with the unit that I kept it anyway--I'm sure the Benchmark would be better for those who have a lot of high-res audio files, but the NOS DAC is quite good enough for my purposes, and I'm looking forward to evaluating the V8P's line in with my phono setup. (So far I've just had an old CD player hooked up to it.)
 
I guess I will sidestep any comments about WHY in the world this review concentrates onusing a V8 as a preamp, and doesn't talk at all about the DAC and the headphone amp functionality, when you can get a version of the unit specifically intended for use as a preamp for the same price as the V8. But if you want to use the X-CAN as a preamp, be sure to GET THE V8P, NOT THE V8. It's the same price and you get the pre-out jacks on the back to run to your amp.
 
Blue Mikey
 
 

benza108 (not verified) -- Thu, 07/16/2009 - 18:34

I'm pretty sure the article was written when the V8 was the only product in existence, and hence the need to use the headphone out sockets as a pre. Musical Fidelity later added the pre amp functionality (V8P). You know what lag times are like in the publishing industry – this was originally published in HiFI+ a few issues ago, which probably means it was written 10 - 12 months ago (when the V8P was merely a twinkle in MF's eyes ... aaah, so sweet)!

greg (not verified) -- Thu, 07/16/2009 - 15:27

It's too bad the review is of a product not pictured. :-( I love both my X-CANv8 and v3. However, the product pictured is the X-CANv8p which actually has two pre-out RCA connections in addition to the normal line-in and line-out. The entire reason for the v8p designation is the inclusion of the pre-out capabilities -- it's a little more 'elegant' as a preamp. :-)

amclaussen (not verified) -- Thu, 07/16/2009 - 19:03

Even when the "review" headline says: "HEADPHONE AMPLIFIER/PREAMPLIFIER, the "reviewer" completely and blatantly forgot to check the unit's capability to drive headphones...  Why?  Maybe he got too lazy to get some pairs of headphones, Lo-Impedance, Medium-Impedance, Hi-Impedance, In-Canal earphones...  and give us SOME insight about the unit preformance as a Headphone Amp...
He wrote:  "Used as a headphone amp the XCan is an admirable performer, well worth the asking  price; but that’s not what this is about. What I’m interested in is using it as a pre-amp"...
How the H... are you telling us that the unit is "an Admirable performer if you don't give us a clue HOW did you arrived to such statement? and HOW is that you forget to remember you are writing to an audience that MAY be more interested than you in using it with headphones?  As a reader, I want to know HOW the unit sounds.  Reading how a Headphone performs as a Preamp, just because the reviewer doesn't like or enjoy (or understand) headphone listening, is not worth reading the "review".
Headphone Amplifiers are NOT an easy design exercise, they have to perform with extremely low noise at the analog output jack (to accomodate high sensitivity In-Canal Earphones and some efficient Headphones too.  They have to show very small Crossover distortion for the same reason; they need to have enought output for some not as efficient headphone types, and finally, they have to be able to perform a with wide range of headphone impedance values, from 32 to 600 or so ohms...  Additionally, they should have an output circuit that is able to drive phones through long extension cables (which are unshielded) without allowing hum and noise getting into amplification and becoming audible when a user wants to be able to reach another room or move around without having to carry all the equipment. For all those reasons, too many headphone output jacks are not even an acceptable option, specially with some headphones, that really deserve or need to be driven with something better than a wimpy pre out  jack  (or worse, like a power amplifier with resistors).  For me, the best approach to getting the best sound from headphones, is a dedicated headphone amp (that could also be a fine Preamp at the same time). This unit looks like it could be such a unit, at a reasonable price, which lately appears to be a bad thing, cause it could be blamed for costing too little to be looked at!
Too sad the reviewer isn't interested at all.
Still, I would like to know which types of headphones were used in the evaluation, if any...  and how good the unit actually SOUNDS tru headphones.

mj37 (not verified) -- Thu, 07/16/2009 - 20:16

I sympathize with amclaussen, but there ANOTHER aspect the reviewer ignored, which is the unit's relative performance as a DAC. I'm mystified as to why Musical Fidelity isn't promoting this aspect of the X-CAN V8[P], given that similar units with built-in USB DACs are arguably one of the hottest categories in audio right now--everybody seems to want to know about the Benchmark, the Lavry, the Grace, the Korean Stello stuff, the Wavelengths, etc. But MF barely even mentions the USB DAC in the V8[P], and this reviewer ignores it even more thoroughly than he ignores the headphone performance.
 
This seems to be a review that cries out to be re-done.
 
Blue Mikey

foxtrot (not verified) -- Sun, 07/19/2009 - 08:34

This little silver box has a few of you worked into a tizzy. The vitrol found in these posts seems strangely misplaced. Please keep our little hifi hobby friendly and direct any additional emotions to where they naturally belong, politics or sports.
The review was written long before the 'p' version was available, fwiw. Seems like a great buy for a simple two source system.
Could you put something like this together with some powered Quad 12l's, or similar and have a killer >$1500 system hooked up to your computer? I think so...
I'd like to see some retailers promote flexible units like this in ready to buy packages. Very nice!

A Lewis (not verified) -- Sat, 11/14/2009 - 22:47

 I was inspired by your article to play an i-pod through my Grado headphone amp then using the headphone jack and going "mono" to play the music through a guitar bass amp for a party.  Worked a treat. Thanks. This headphone tube amp seems like a good deal.

All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1999 - 2011 NextScreen. All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.