• The Aon 3 features an enclosure shaped like a “truncated pyramid”—a design said to offer “significant performance advantages” in the form of “non-parallel cabinet walls” and “reduced baffle area around the tweeter.” In keeping with established GoldenEar design aesthetics, the Aon 3 is offered only in black, where the cabinet sports gloss black top and bottom caps, while the sidewalls of the enclosure are wrapped in black designer fabric.
o Gold-plated speaker binding posts.
o Recessed keyhole hanger on the rear panel facilitates wall mounting.
.jpg)
In just a moment I will talk in some depth about the sound of the Aon 3, but before I do, let me invite you to take a look at a pair of reviews I have written on GoldenEar’s Triton Two floorstanding speakers. The first is a review of a stereo pair of Triton Two’s published in The Absolute Sound (click to read the review) while the other is a two-part review prepared for The Perfect Vision covering a Triton Two-based surround for The Perfect Vision (click to read Part 1, and Part 2). As you will discover in a moment, the Aon 3 and Triton Two share some strengths in common, so that these past reviews can provide some background context for my remarks.
One of the strongest design elements in the Aon 3 is GoldenEar’s superb HVFR tweeter—an exotic Heil-type tweeter that offers excellent high frequency extension, superb detailing and transient speed, and is blessedly free from apparent edginess or problems with overshoot and ringing. In listening to the Aon 3, it rapidly becomes clear that the HVFR tweeter sets a very, very high performance bar that the rest of the speaker in turn attempts to match. The fact is that the HVFR tweeter is so agile and finely focused that it becomes a real challenge to build a midrange driver that can keep pace. But frankly, it is in the area of midrange driver development that I think the GoldenEar team has done some of its best work in creating the Aon 3.
In previous models such as the Triton Two, GoldenEar has solved the problem of tweeter-to-midrange matching by using relatively small and light mid-bass drivers designed to provide “smooth linear frequency response extending above 20 kHz,” a high-frequency benchmark rarely achieved by most midrange drivers. The reasoning was that only such an ultra-wideband midrange driver would offer the speed and responsiveness necessary to merge seamlessly with the blazingly quick HVFR tweeter. Consequently, GoldenEar made serious R&D investments in midrange driver technology—R&D efforts that led the firm to use computer-optimized diaphragms, rigid open-basket chassis, specialized high-temperature voice-coil assemblies, and their distinctive multi-vaned phase plug. The resulting drivers did, as promised, merge beautifully with the HVFR tweeter.
For the Aon 3, GoldenEar followed much the same design philosophy in developing a new ultra-wide bandwidth mid-bass driver for the Aon 3, but with a twist. Unlike the Triton Two’s dual mid-bass drivers, the Aon 3 mid-bass driver not only goes high, but also goes surprisingly low—low enough that no separate active woofer is required. Instead, GoldenEar cleverly fits a pair of 8-inch passive radiators, which help supplement the speaker’s bass output, on the sloping sides of the Aon 3 cabinet. The result is a remarkably versatile mid-bass driver, one that seems to possess the speed, detail, and extension of a small driver, while also providing the kind of bass output normally associated with a much larger one. As result the Aon 3 offers a wonderfully seamless blend between its mid-bass driver and tweeter, but also offers something more: namely, unexpectedly deep bass from what is, after all, a very compact two-way bookshelf monitor.
In practice, this means you get a speaker that offers many of the virtues you would expect to find in much higher priced monitors: good midrange-to-treble balance, terrific openness and transparency, and plenty of subtlety and detail. But you also enjoy bass solidity and depth that are rare in small bookshelf monitors of any price. While I won’t tell you the Aon 3 has the low-end clout of, say, the Triton Two, which would be untrue, I will tell you the Aon 3 offers enough bass that—in small-to-mid-size rooms—its low-end performance should satisfy most listeners, on most types of music, most of the time. That is saying a mouthful, given how small and relatively inexpensive the Aon 3 is. What is perhaps even more impressive than the quantity and depth of the Aon 3’s bass is the quality of its bass, starting from the lower midrange and ranging right on down the lowest frequencies the speaker can reproduce. What is more, the low end (and lower midrange) of the Aon 3 is every bit as agile, detailed, and nuanced as the speaker’s midrange and top-end are. This is the quality that, in my view, may make the Aon 3 an even more appealing speaker for some audiophiles than the Triton Two is.
Comments
Mr Martens, here is a sincere question: how does this Aon3 sound when I put on my turntable a recording of an admittedly more harmonically and dynamically complex music (i.e. Blackalicious, Marilyn Manson, Bruckner, Strauss, Henze or Stockhausen) ? I've noticed a disturbing trend among the "high-end" reviewers ; The more expensive the speakers reviewed are, the smaller groups are used to justified the glowing review. This trend has originated with the esteemed Jon Valin as the extreme and, apparently much admired ruse, to introduce us, the suckers, to the "literature" of the audio reviewing, rather than to the actual reviewing - if there ever could be such thing,
I know, everything is in the "ear" of the beholder, but please , if you have to refer to a recording that you love in the context of any review, test the equipment with some other possibilities that we might also love, You know, the true music lovers can be quite eclectic, at least the ones I know.
Hi radberanek,
Let me address your question by saying that the Aon 3 does quite well with moderately complex and dynamically active orchestral material (one of my favorite test pieces in this vein would be Getty's "Plump Jack" Overture as performed by The Academy of St. Martin in the Fields and as conducted by Sir Neville Marriner); indeed, I think that when faced with complex/dynamically vigorous material the Aon3 performans better by far than most like-priced two-way monitors.
The caveat, though, would be that if you really want to push things (e.g., playing just about any of Mahler's biggest orchestral passages at high volume levels), you can eventually reach a point where the demands of the music will exceed the limits of the Aon3's performance envelope. On such occasions, the Aon3 doesn't sound "ugly," but it does eventually start to sound compressed, then congested, and finally just plain strained. But again, you really have to lean on the speaker pretty hard (listening at levels I personally would find unpleasant if not painful) before it begins to protest in any obvious way. On the whole, it's pretty graceful in dealing with the "big stuff."
Summing up: While I feel the Aon3 is far more dynamically capable than most monitors its size or price, it would still not be my favorite choice for a steady diet of power music played at high volume levels. For that purpose, either of GoldenEar's Triton models would be the better choice. 'Hope these comments are useful.
Best, Chris Martens
Chris Martens
Editor, Avguide.com/Playback/The Perfect Vision
Mr Martens,
A few years back you gave a glowing review on the NHT Classic 3 speaker. Based on your review I ran out and bought a pair. I have been extremly happy with these speakers and your review was spot on. Your review of the Aon 3 reminded me alot of how you felt about the NHT 3 speakers. I would like to know your thoughts in how they compare. Thanks
Frank