Many Playback readers have become fans of portable hi-fi systems where the notion is that all—or nearly all—system components should be small enough to fit in your pocket, handbag, or backpack.
For many listeners, the game starts by acquiring a good set of earphones or perhaps custom-fit in-ear monitors that can be plugged directly into an iPod or other portable digital music player (including, in some cases, laptops, netbook or tablet PCs, etc.). But over time, the logical progression of things—not to mention our innate desire to take musical excellence to the max—often leads us to a quest for high-quality portable amplifiers (some of which come with onboard DACs).
With that thought in mind, let’s take of a look at four of the best portable amplifier options Playback has encountered thus far, weighing the particular strengths (or possible downsides) of each model in turn.
http://www.avguide.com/review/alo-audio-rx-mk2-portable-headphone-amplifier-playback-43


What it is: A pure, straightforward, and beautifully made headphone amplifier (sans onboard DAC) that can successfully drive a very wide range of earphones, in-ear monitors, and headphones.
Why you might choose it: To paraphrase the words of acerbic political advisor James Carville, “It’s the sound, stupid.” In a world where many headphone amps sound a bit bright, brittle, and a little too edgy for their own good, ALO’s Rx Mk2 offers a wonderfully warm, rich, natural sound that offers vibrant tonal colors and enough power to drive most headphones.
Visit one of the popular Head-Fi Can-Jam events and you’ll see any number of headphone/earphone manufacturers using the Rx Mk2 as their reference amplifier of choice. There are at least four reasons for this. First, the little ALO is beautifully made and very sturdy. Second, the amp’s onboard battery pack and clever charging system make for A) lots of playing time per charge, and B) the ability to do partial recharges without having the battery develop a “discharge memory” that will limit playing time in the future. Third, the amp offers two switch selectable gain ranges, which makes it easy to adapt to ‘phones of widely varying sensitivity ratings. Fourth, as mentioned above, there’s the sound, which tends to show most ‘phones in a very positive, flattering light.
Why you might look further: Much though we like the Rx Mk2, we can think of two reasons you might not choose it. The first is price: at $449, the Rx Mk2II isn’t cheap, but then truly good stuff almost never is. The second is the fact that the Rx Mk2 is purely an amplifier, whereas your particular needs might be better served by a combination amp/DAC.
http://www.avguide.com/review/centrance-dacport-2496-usb-dacheadphone-amplifier-playback-34


What it is: CEntrance’s DACport is a bit of an iconoclast in that it is a tiny, roughly cylinder-shaped, and entirely USB-powered combination high-resolution USB DAC (96kHz/24-bit capable) and—get this—pure class A-powered headphone amplifier. As such, the DACport is offered as a potentially ideal companion product for listeners who prefer to use laptop computers (or other devices with USB interfaces) as their source components of choice.
Why you might choose it: when you get right down to it, one of the main reasons to buy the DACport is to enjoy the cumulative benefits of the many different advanced technologies that have gone into its design. CEntrance, as it happens, is a high-powered technology consulting company whose clientele includes makers of DACs for the high-end audio and pro-sound (think, recording studio) communities, as well as a large number of manufacturers of chip-level DAC devices. All of these clients have turned to CEntrance to tap the firm’s expertise in the areas of USB interface design, device driver design, and jitter reduction technologies—expertise that has most definitely found its way into the deceptively simple-looking DACport.
Comments
First let me thank you for the great reviews Chris!
On your recommendation, I got the Monster Turbine Pro Copper and it is the best sound I've heard from a universal IEM. Thank you!
I'm looking for an amp to go with the monsters. Is there any other option to bypass the iphone dac, besides the ALO Audio package. The ALO package is huge. While you might be able to carry in your pocked the iphone with the Nuforce icon mobile, there's no way you can carry the iphone with the ALOs in your pocket. What's the point of having the greatest portable gear if you can't carry it around?
I have a limitation in that I don't understand the difficulty in bypassing the iPhone dac. Is it so difficult that it can be done only by two separates? Can't it be done in one enclosure? Is it something we should expect in the future (an amp/dac that can bypass the iPhone dac, in one enclosure) or it's so difficult that we should give up. If I can't use the portable dac with the iphone then it's useless, since at home I listen to the bigger desktop dac.
I'm waiting to the JH16pro with the DSP crossover to come out before I upgrade to the custom IEM but it seems that it too won't be able to bypass the iphone DAC.
Thank you again for all the great work!
Marius
I have been very pleased with Ray Samuel's P-51 Mustang, which bypasses the IPod's internal amp with an optional cable, battery life good, sound quality outstanding. Not cheap but small and a significant improvement to the IPod, 'cos it will readily drive a full size headphone.
if you use an LOD cable any amp bypasses the iPod's internal amp, but what I'm looking for is to bypass the iPod's DAC. The iPod/iPhone does not have a high quality DAC and even if you have a good amp and a good IEM, if the DAC is not of high quality, you won't get the most out of your good amp and IEMs. That's the dilemma. The DAC in the iPhone is the weak link in the chain and, as Robert Harley says, a system can only be as good as the weakest link in the chain.
the only product i know that can bypass apple iPod's internal DAC is the Wadia 171i and its not portable.
Hi mutyangparol,
Actually, there are now several products that, like the Wadia 171 iTransport (which was the first of its kind), do bypass the iPod's internal DACs. Here's a partial list (there may be others):
1) Peachtree iDecco amp/DAC/dock
2) Peachtree iNova amp/DAC/dock
3) HRT (High Resolution Technologies) iStreamer DAC
4) ...and (on the basis of uncomfirmed hearsay) certain select Marantz components said to have a special front-panel digital dock feature.
The good news, I feel, is that Wadia's brilliant idea is slowly but surely gaining traction in the marketplace.
Best, Chris Martens
Chris Martens
Editor, Avguide.com/Playback/The Perfect Vision
http://aloaudio.com/algorhythm-solo-rx-mk2-amp-alo-audio-interconnects-c...
This does it also, but it doesn't fit into your pocket.
Also? What are you referring to?
I'm referring to the fact the the ALO DAC/Amp bypasses the iPhone's internal DAC not only the internal Amp.
You mean the AlgoRythm Solo and Rx Mk2 combo at $998+ $235 for the cables. Doesn't really fit the pocket metaphorically and literally for a portable. IMHO if you want true mobility live with iPod's decent fidelity on good earphones (eg Shure, Klipsch, Etymotic, etc.) and when you want to do some serious listening dock your iPod on the Wadia, hook it up to your serious hi-fi gear, take your seat and enjoy your AIFF/WAV files.
I am looking for a truly portable (battery operated) DAC that bypasses the DAC in an iPod and is also a headphone amp.
I cannot find a product that HRT, Pico, or FiiO offers that will do this.
Any suggestions or ideas?
I don't know of any portable products that bypass the iPod's internal DAC.
I would humbly suggest that you try a Fiio E17, mate it with a Etymotic 4-P and sit back and enjoy...
The new iPhone 5 has a digital out that is used by their $30 adapter. The adapter has the DAC built in. Eventually with the new mini-adapter other external DACs are possible.
Steven Stone
Contributor to The Absolute Sound, EnjoytheMusic.com, Vintage Guitar Magazine, and other fine publications
The Fostex HP-P1 ($632.32) is portable, bypasses the DAC in iPods and is a headphone amp.
Aha! There is one after all. Thank you Johnccp. Perhaps there are more to come.