

The Elk Grove Village, IL-based firm Etymotic Research is one of the oldest and best-known makers of high-performance in-ear headphones, producing several models, such as the ER-4 Micro Pro family of headphones ($299/pair), that have come to be regarded as classics. But since the advent of the ER-4 Micro Pros a number of years ago, several market factors have changed. First, we have seen the widespread acceptance of the game-changing iPhone (yes, the ER-4 design pre-dated the arrival of the iPhone), meaning that many prospective buyers not only want high quality earphones, but also require devices that can function as headsets (i.e., that have built-in microphones and other cell phone control features). Second, a number of new competitors have joined the fray, creating pricing pressures, so that many enthusiasts want top-tier (or at least near top-tier) performance at a lower entry price that Etymotic's ER-4 models can provide.
To address these emerging requirements, Etymotic Research created the hf2 (hf2 stands for “high fidelity | hands-free”) noise-isolating headset/earphone—one that, in terms of configuration and sound, is in essence an “ER-4 junior.” Like all of the ER-4 models, the hf2 features balanced armature-type drivers. According to Etymotic Research Product Development Engineer David Friesema, the firm believes that balanced armature-type drivers offer, in an absolute sense, the highest overall performance potential (although Etymotic soon intends to release lower cost models that will use moving coil-type drivers).
Accordingly, the balanced-armature-equipped hf2 represents an effort to capture much of the sonic goodness of the ER-4, but at roughly half the price—and with headset functionality thrown in for good measure. Friesema enthusiastically encouraged me to compare the hf2 side-by-side with the ER-4P, which is precisely what I do in this review.
Consider this combination headset/earphone if: you favor a sound that is built more for accuracy and tonal neutrality than for any kind of bass or upper midrange/treble embellishments. If anything, the hf2’s tonal balance struck us as offering a slightly warmer and arguably more natural sound than that of the ER-4P. Resolution is very good, though not quite up to the (extremely) high standards set by the ER-4P. Noise isolation is simply excellent, provided you can find a set of ER eartips that seal well and fit comfortably. When fitted properly, the hf2 makes a very viable alternative to larger and more costly active, noise-cancelling over-the-ear headphones.
Look further if: you seek true top-tier levels of resolution in terms of capturing the finest of low-level sonic details and bits of textural information. While the hf2 is one of the stronger performers in its price class in this respect, you’ll enjoy an even more sharply focused sound by by stepping up to the ER-4P. The fit of the hf2s can be controversial. We raise this point because Etymotic’s familiar triple-flange rubber eartips—the units shown in most Etymotic product photos—fit some users beautifully, but can be borderline uncomfortable for others. If the triple-flange eartips don’t work for you, try using Etymotic’s compressible foam and/or mushroom-shaped “Glider” eartips, either of which may provide a more comfortable fit. For sheer sound quality, however, we think the triple-flange tips are tough to beat.
Ratings (relative to comparably priced in-ear headphones):
Comments
Nice headphones. And what about the price ? or did i miss something.. :)
Page 4 listed the price at $179.
Your opinion. How do these and p4 compare w the top shure ear phones? I have both and love both.
It seems that lately, most reviews from AVguide lack enough comparisons to well stablished examples... therefore reader is left wondering. If the reviewer does not want to give an honest opinion about how the reviewed item compares to other well known examples, or worst (the reviewer has not made the obligued comparisons) it is still undesirable for the reader.
Amen! See this discussion here:
http://www.avguide.com/forums/arc-ref-610-vs-vtl-siegfried-800
Their excuses about "champeens of the world" are a copout. They refuse to take the customer's point of view. Or they fail to understand that the customer is looking to make a decision. Decision making requires a simple "compare/ contrast" with another popular product that one may have heard. 2-4 pages of words is nice for a nerd reading about this stuff, but just doesn't cut it for someone looking to make a purchase. This is just common sense - or is it?
Helllo???!!!!!
amclaussen and anonymous_XXX,
Did you miss the Competitive Analysis section comparing the hf2 to both the Monster Turbines and to the Etymotic Research ER-4P? I chose those two examples for two reasons. First, I chose the Monster because it is a good performer, similar in price to the hf2, and very widely distributed (hence, there's a decent likelihood people will have heard it). It is also something of an "up-and-comer." Second, I chose the ER-4P because it is one of the best established and most widely embraced performance benchmarks in the industry.
So, as you can see, I **did** make comparisons, whereas it appears you were not paying attention to them...
One further note for anonymous_XXX: My intent is not to tell you what to buy. That would be, I feel, an insult both to your ears and to your intelligence. Instead, I'm trying to tell you what I've found that I believe (on the basis of long experience) is worth looking at and listening to, and why. After that, further exploration and the final purchase decision is up to you. And for the record, I fully respect your ability to make good choices.
One thing I've learned about audio purchasing decisions, however, is that they can rarely be broken down to a matter of simple-minded "shootouts." Sorry, but that's just the nature of the beast.
Best,
Chris Martens
Chris Martens
Editor, Avguide.com/Playback/The Perfect Vision