CEntrance DACport 24/96 USB DAC/Headphone Amplifier (Playback 34)

True High-End Sound Goes Mobile

In ways like these and many more, the DACport manages to sound like a much more expensive product than it actually is. If I had to pick one adjective with which to describe the DACport’s sound, the word I think fits best might be “sophisticated.” One hopes, of course, that a roughly four-hundred-dollar DAC/amp will sound “good for the money,” but the DACport does more than that. It sounds just plain good. Period. With no equivocal ifs, ands, or buts.

The only areas where the DACport’s minor limitations become apparent involve bass-oriented track where the material requires a degree of low frequency richness and weight that the DACport cannot quite deliver. One example might be Merlo Podlewski’s rubbery, full-bodied, reggae-inflected bass line in “Wasting Time” from Jack Johnson’s On and On [Universal]. The DACport does, as expected, a fine job with the almost elastic textures and overall “feel” of the bass line, but it just misses achieving the big, room-filling, reggae bass sound that the track demands.

 

COMPETITIVE COMPARISONS

As mentioned above, we know of few if any products that do precisely what the DACport does and of none that provide USB-fed power supplies. Nevertheless, we think readers may want to know how the DACport stacks up A) versus good—albeit non-portable—USB DAC/headphone amps we’ve heard, and B) versus comparably priced high-quality headphone amps we’ve tried. To this end, we’ll compare the DACport to the critically acclaimed Peachtree Audio iDecco USB DAC/headphone amp/integrated amp (click here to read the Playback review) and to HiFiMAN’s tube-powered EF5 headphone amp (Playback review pending).

DACport vs. Peachtree iDecco ($999)
• The DACport costs roughly 40% of what the Peachtree iDecco does, though in fairness the Peachtree incorporates both tube and solid-state output stages, features four digital audio and one analog input, a digital iPod dock, and a 40 Wpc power amp. In short, both products give a lot of versatility for the money.
• The DACport is portable, whereas the iDecco is a desktop unit.
• The DACport provides a true 24/96 DAC, while the Peachtree DAC upsamples to 24/96 levels.
• Comparing just the DAC/headphone sections of the two products (apples to apples, as they say), the Peachtree offer a slightly warmer, smoother, darker, sound and exhibits a slightly more softly focused character than the DACport. In contrast, the DACport exhibits marginally brighter upper mids and highs, a more fine-grained and sharply focused sound, and somewhat more lightly balanced mid and low bass (but bass that, while it may be shelved downward by a dB or two, is by no means rolled off). In general, the DACport offers a bit tighter, more precise control over timbres and textures.
• Both products do a great job of dispensing with potential USB upper midrange/treble edginess and glare.

DACport vs. HiFiMAN EF5 ($399)
• The products are the same price, but the DACport is both a DAC and a headphone amp, where the EF5 is a two-piece, tube-powered headphone amplifier only.
• The DACport and HiFiMAN EF5 are roughly comparable in overall levels of transparency, though the HiFiMAN provides the desirable qualities of harmonic richness and “bloom” that are part and parcel of its tube-powered circuit. The DACport, in contrast, offers the effortless delineation of details for which fine solid-state class A amplifiers are known.
• Both units are extremely quiet, but the HiFiMAN EF5 offers dramatically more gain, should the need arise. This characteristic comes to the foreground with either unit is asked to power a truly difficult to drive headphone such as HiFiMAN’s HE-5LE planar magnetic headphone. The tiny DACport can actually drive the HE-5LE ‘phones surprisingly well, but it requires near maximum gain settings to do so. In contrast, the EF5 drive the HE-5LE with ease, while still keeping plenty of additional gain in reserve.
• Both units offer very good levels of bass tautness, pitch definition and control, but the EF5 offers significantly more bass “slam” and more natural (and thus more powerful) bass weighting overall.
• The EF5 is arguably the superior headphone amplifier overall, offering greater versatility and a somewhat more compelling sound. Still, the DACport’s class A amp offers sonic refinement that is a gift that keeps on giving, delivering a precise, suave and sophisticated sound that will appeal to many listeners.
• Again, the DACport is portable and incorporates a very high performance DAC, while the like-priced EF5 is a tabletop headphone amplifier only.

Comments

artk -- Thu, 08/12/2010 - 11:02

I'll bet if you did a double blind test of this against all those multithousand dollars dacs, no one would be able to tell the difference.

mariuscmorar@ya... -- Thu, 08/12/2010 - 15:13

Chris,

Thank you so much for your insights. I'm wandering how does the sound of CEntrance DACport compare to Emmeline "The Predator". Both are meant to be portable, both are DACs and have headphone amps with plenty of power. The Predator has a battery, the DACport doesn't, but beyond this specifications, how does the sound compare. Which sounds better?

Thanks again!

ctbarker32@gmail.com -- Thu, 08/12/2010 - 15:17

I'm glad TAS is finally giving some context for a product regarding price and performance. Unfortunately, your google skills seem lacking.

How about comparing to the HRT Music Streamer II USB Dac that is also 24b/96k and usb 1.1/2.0 capable? I have one and think it's sound quality is first rate and it only costs $150 for the "II" base model.

You may say "well there's no headphone amp" but you go on to compare the CEntrance to a full integrated amp that is far outside the product category of the CEntrance and the Music Streamer so I don't think I am off-base with my comparison.

I use my HRT Music Streamer II connected through a $70 TC Electronic Level Pilot passive volume control (very cool product TAS should check out!) into powered KRK Rokit 5 desktop monitors. I was amazed at the immediate sound improvement with this signal path. It was like I bought new speakers. MS II ($150) plus Level Pilot ($70) cost - $220. Quality of sound - priceless.

-CB

Chris Martens -- Tue, 09/14/2010 - 12:05

Hi ctbarker,

'Just wanted to point out that, while I often write for TAS, my review of the DACport was done under the auspices of TAS' sister digital publication, Playback (Playback specializes in desktop audio/headphones/small audio systems, etc.).

I also thought I'd mention that my google skills aren't as bad as you might think. But what those google skills tell me is that my colleague Hi-Fi+ Editor Alan Sircom has already done a thorough review of the HRT Music Streamer II and II+, so that I didn't think it necessary to revisit those products in Playback.

For your enjoyment, here's the link to Alan Sircom's review: http://www.avguide.com/review/hrt-streamer-ii-and-streamer-ii-hi-fi-72

Best, Chris Martens

Chris Martens
Editor, Avguide.com/Playback/The Perfect Vision 

agb -- Thu, 08/12/2010 - 22:20

iBasso Cobra D10 Compact DAC and Headphone Amp has been available since early 2009. I have no idea how good it is. But it has one huge advantage. It is portable in real terms... While the DacPort needs your computer (you cannot power it with your iPod) the iBasso is battery powered. It has a Wolfson DAC chipset. They have many models, at half the price of the DacPort. Again, until we have comparisons to check their sound out, we just don't know.

See it here: http://www.ibasso.com/en/products/show.asp?ID=39

jeffrey@vog.com -- Thu, 08/19/2010 - 22:56

On nearly every score, you seem to prefer the HiFiMAN EF5. And yet you recommend the CEntrance DACport. In theory at least, a truly effective DAC should convert the digital USB signal from a computer into a much better analog signal than the rudimentary conversion that a laptop can natively perform; that's why many of us insist on (and pay for) a DAC to improve the output of our iPod. But you seem to have found no real advantage to the DACport besides its portability and ability to be powered through its USB connection. Is the presence of a good DAC worth nothing? Or does the CEentrance not have a particularly good DAC?

Chris Martens -- Tue, 09/14/2010 - 12:31

Hi Jeffrey,

As I see things, the HiFiMAN EF5 and CEntrance DACport are very, very different products.

The HiFiMAN EF5 is one of my favorite reasonably priced headphone amps. But note: it is a two-piece, AC-powered, tube-powered unit that is intended for desktop applications or for use in conjunction with high-end audio systems. It is NOT portable, and it does NOT contain a DAC of any kind.

The DACport is really two products in one, both of them ingeniously configured to be USB-powered (i.e., no AC power supply is needed). The DACport is, then, an extremely high-quality 24/96 USB DAC married to a very high-quality class A headphone amplifier, and it is portable, though it does need to be used with a laptop that provides full-fledged USB ports. As agb points out below, the DACport is not set up to be driven directly from an iPod (because the iPod is not, so far as I am aware, set up to provide power to an external device via USB).

Looking only at the headphone amplifier sections of the products, my nod would go to the HiFiMAN EF5; it sounds terrific. But taken as a whole, there's no denying the superior versatility (and portability) of the DACport.

To answer your two questions, yes, the presence of a good DAC is worth a lot (a whole lot in the case of the DACport), and yes, the CEntrance DAC is a very good one indeed. These are two of the reasons I recommended the product. The portability of the DACport is really compelling, too, and I like the fact that the USB interface cable is also the de facto power cable (I can't speak for you, by I find it's nice not to have to bring along a wall-wart-type power supply for the DACport when I travel).

'Hope this clarifies things somewhat.

Best, Chris Martens

Chris Martens
Editor, Avguide.com/Playback/The Perfect Vision 

jeffrey@vog.com -- Fri, 09/24/2010 - 21:36

Hi Chris,

Many thanks for your clarification. I've happily followed you for years in TAS. So perhaps you might answer:

The earphone output of the iPod is obviously analog and cannot benefit from a DAC. Various gadgets such as the Squeezebox are said to intercept the iPod's output as a digital stream, before it goes through the iPod's internal DAC. This is advantageous because the iPod's DAC is said to be of low quality. So,

1. Is this the case? How much better is the DAC in, say, the DACport? Or in the Squeezebox, for that matter.

2. Is the iPod's digital stream of sufficient quality to merit spending money on it?

3. If so, how can one get tap the iPod's digital data (through the oblong socket at the bottom) to use the DACport with it--the way the Squeezebox (and perhaps the Wadja) do?

4. Is the DACport's utility limited to headphones or can its analog output be sent to my (powered) desktop speakers? Or even to a large old stereo system?

Many thanks in advance, Chris.

Jeffrey Steingarten

jeffrey@vog.com -- Fri, 09/24/2010 - 21:36

Hi Chris,

Many thanks for your clarification. I've happily followed you for years in TAS. So perhaps you might answer:

The earphone output of the iPod is obviously analog and cannot benefit from a DAC. Various gadgets such as the Squeezebox are said to intercept the iPod's output as a digital stream, before it goes through the iPod's internal DAC. This is advantageous because the iPod's DAC is said to be of low quality. So,

1. Is this the case? How much better is the DAC in, say, the DACport? Or in the Squeezebox, for that matter.

2. Is the iPod's digital stream of sufficient quality to merit spending money on it?

3. If so, how can one get tap the iPod's digital data (through the oblong socket at the bottom) to use the DACport with it--the way the Squeezebox (and perhaps the Wadja) do?

4. Is the DACport's utility limited to headphones or can its analog output be sent to my (powered) desktop speakers? Or even to a large old stereo system?

Many thanks in advance, Chris.

Jeffrey Steingarten

wstallsmith@ear... -- Thu, 09/02/2010 - 11:38

agb in his comment says that the iPod Touch USB connection cannot supply needed power to the CEntrance DACport 24/96 DAC/Headphone Amplifier. Is this true? If so, the CEntrance would be of little use to me. Please clarify this point. Thanks.

Chris Martens -- Tue, 09/14/2010 - 12:40

Hi wstallsmith,

I believe agb is correct. The DACport is not set up to be driven directly from an iPod (because the iPod is not, so far as I am aware, set up to provide power to an external device via USB).

But note: if you like the general idea of the DACport but need something more iPod-friendly, watch for my upcoming Playback review of the iQube V2 DAC/headphone amplifier from the Dutch firm Qables. The iQube V2 provides both an analog input and a USB DAC input, and it is a battery-powered unit but with an interesting twist. Specifically, the unit is set up so that its battery is charged via its USB cable--not from a wall-wart-type power supply. Once charged up, however, the unit will continue to run even if the USB cable is disconnected. Thus, you can use it with an iPod, or feed it digital audio data directly from a computer. Pretty cool concept, no? Thus, the iQube V2 sort of "splits the difference" with the CEntrance approach.

Best, Chris Martens

Chris Martens
Editor, Avguide.com/Playback/The Perfect Vision 

wstallsmith@ear... -- Tue, 10/05/2010 - 13:37

Chris, many thanks for your response. I await your review of the Dutch device, which looks as if might answer my needs exactly. I hope that it might also be published in TAS, to which I have subscribed for years.

MikeMercer -- Fri, 12/09/2011 - 08:00

'm VERY excited to be a part of the CEntrance team now (have joined them as director of marketing)!! I had reviewed their DACPort myself, and loved it - plus: This review from Chris helped seal the deal for me!! NICE one Chris, as ALWAYS!!!!

Chris Martens -- Fri, 12/09/2011 - 15:52

Hi Mike,

Heartfelt congratulations on your new position with CEntrance. The DACport is quite an impressive component, both in terms of sound **and** build quality. That latter aspect is sometimes tricky to convey in a review, but it's the sort of thing you really notice when you live with the product for a time. (You find yourself asking questions like, "Is this about what I would get if, say, an aerospace company decided to build a portable DAC/amp."). 'Works for me.

Chris Martens
Editor, Avguide.com/Playback/The Perfect Vision 

MikeMercer -- Tue, 12/20/2011 - 15:03

Thanks Chris!!

I'm looking forward to keeping in close touch and getting you a CEntrance DACmini PX (DACmini plus a 25w per channel amp - which is voiced to work with these new CEntrance co-planar/coaxial desktop speakers (Masterclass 2502) I'm checking out right now - seeing if they pass my own acid test - thus far so good)!!!! As you know, I won't work for a company if I don't believe i their products - I'm not that good a salesman!!

All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1999 - 2011 NextScreen. All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.