CEntrance DACport 24/96 USB DAC/Headphone Amplifier (Playback 34)

True High-End Sound Goes Mobile

Bass is extremely taut, well controlled, and offers exceptional pitch definition. There’s just no low-end looseness or murkiness to be found anywhere in this little amp/DAC, which is a good thing. Through the DACport, plucked instruments such as cellos and electric or acoustic basses have clear and distinctive sonic signatures, as they should, and on low percussion you can easily discern skin sounds as drums are struck. Even very low pedal notes on pipe organs maintain an almost crystalline purity and clarity. The only drawback I could find was that the DACport’s mid and low bass ranges sound just slightly lightly balanced relative to other good DACs or headphone amps you might audition. The problem isn’t that the DACport can’t go low, because in fact it can and does, nor is it that low frequencies are “rolled off,” because they aren’t. Rather the situation is that the DACport’s mid and low-bass sound as if they are—at least on some headphones—shelved downward by just a dB or two. This isn’t a damning flaw by any stretch of the imagination, and it is a characteristic that can work to your advantage on some headphones, but it is one way in which headphone amps with bigger, beefier power supplies may differentiate themselves from the DACport.

Amazingly, the DACport offers sufficient power and gain to drive almost any type of headphone you might throw at it, and to satisfying volume levels. Note, however, that to get adequate output with really difficult-to-drive ‘phones, you may need to run the DACport at close to its maximum gain settings, which—for the record—CEntrance advises is fine for you to do should the need arise. As a message on the CEntrance Web site states, “There is no danger in setting DACport’s volume level to maximum—the internal amplifier has plenty of headroom and is guaranteed to never overload, even during the loudest musical passages.”

During my tests I used the DACport to drive a very wide range of headphones including the Shure SRH840 (44 Ohms), the Beyerdynamic DT-990 Edition (600 Ohms), the Sennheiser HD800 (300 Ohms) and the notoriously difficult-to-drive HiFiMAN HE-5LE (37 Ohms). To my surprise and delight, the DACport drove them all without apparent distress, though the HiFiMAN ‘phones did require very high volume control settings in order to really “sing.”

 

MUSICAL EXAMPLES

To appreciate the cleanliness, purity and extension of the DACport's mid and low bass regions, listen to the descending organ pedal note progression in the “Pie Jesu” section of the John Rutter Requiem [Reference Recordings]. As the chorus floats high above, the organ drops lower and lower in pitch, eventually getting down into frequencies that most loudspeakers cannot adequately reproduce. Yet the DACport never flinched, tracking the descent of the pipe organ’s pitch until the sound hovered in that deepest of deep regions where pitch seems to morph into something akin to a physical sensation where you feel as if you are being shaken by huge, shuddering columns of air. Where some DACs or amps would make the pipe organ in the Rutter piece sound amorphous or ill-defined, the DACport maintained near-perfect pitch control even as it plumbed the depths of the lowest notes.

At the opposite end of the frequency spectrum, the DACport made veritable child’s play of the complex cornucopia of high-frequency percussion sounds presented in “Talking Wind”, from Marilyn Mazur and Jan Garbarek’s Elixir [ECM]. This particular track has become a favorite upper midrange and treble test of mine, in that it shows a very wide range of high-pitched percussion instruments—each with distinctive timbres and, especially, varying dynamic envelopes—all in play at once. It’s not easy to capture the character of each individual instrumental voice, given the diverse combination of gongs, cymbals, chimes and bells used in this track, and it is harder still to convey the realistic sound and elusive “feel” of actual metallic objects being struck and left to ring out in the open air. Yet the DACport did a more than creditable job with the track, effortlessly delineating the variegated voices of the instruments and capturing the penetrating yet also shimmering sound associated with metal percussion instruments at play.

Finally, the DACport does a beautiful job with voices, as in the title track from Mary-Chapin Carpenter’s Come On Come On [SBME Special Markets]. For me, one of the most appealing aspects of this track is the way that, on the chorus lines from which the song’s title is derived, the singer transitions from full voice to lines sung just barely above a whisper level. Thus, you hear Carpenter sing, “(full voice) Come on, Come on/(whispered) It’s getting late now/(full voice) Come on, Come on/(barely above a whisper) Take my hand…” The DACport handles these transitions with real polish and finesse, conveying not only the sound of Carpenter’s voice, but of reverb tails lingering on the air.

Comments

artk -- Thu, 08/12/2010 - 11:02

I'll bet if you did a double blind test of this against all those multithousand dollars dacs, no one would be able to tell the difference.

mariuscmorar@ya... -- Thu, 08/12/2010 - 15:13

Chris,

Thank you so much for your insights. I'm wandering how does the sound of CEntrance DACport compare to Emmeline "The Predator". Both are meant to be portable, both are DACs and have headphone amps with plenty of power. The Predator has a battery, the DACport doesn't, but beyond this specifications, how does the sound compare. Which sounds better?

Thanks again!

ctbarker32@gmail.com -- Thu, 08/12/2010 - 15:17

I'm glad TAS is finally giving some context for a product regarding price and performance. Unfortunately, your google skills seem lacking.

How about comparing to the HRT Music Streamer II USB Dac that is also 24b/96k and usb 1.1/2.0 capable? I have one and think it's sound quality is first rate and it only costs $150 for the "II" base model.

You may say "well there's no headphone amp" but you go on to compare the CEntrance to a full integrated amp that is far outside the product category of the CEntrance and the Music Streamer so I don't think I am off-base with my comparison.

I use my HRT Music Streamer II connected through a $70 TC Electronic Level Pilot passive volume control (very cool product TAS should check out!) into powered KRK Rokit 5 desktop monitors. I was amazed at the immediate sound improvement with this signal path. It was like I bought new speakers. MS II ($150) plus Level Pilot ($70) cost - $220. Quality of sound - priceless.

-CB

Chris Martens -- Tue, 09/14/2010 - 12:05

Hi ctbarker,

'Just wanted to point out that, while I often write for TAS, my review of the DACport was done under the auspices of TAS' sister digital publication, Playback (Playback specializes in desktop audio/headphones/small audio systems, etc.).

I also thought I'd mention that my google skills aren't as bad as you might think. But what those google skills tell me is that my colleague Hi-Fi+ Editor Alan Sircom has already done a thorough review of the HRT Music Streamer II and II+, so that I didn't think it necessary to revisit those products in Playback.

For your enjoyment, here's the link to Alan Sircom's review: http://www.avguide.com/review/hrt-streamer-ii-and-streamer-ii-hi-fi-72

Best, Chris Martens

Chris Martens
Editor, Avguide.com/Playback/The Perfect Vision 

agb -- Thu, 08/12/2010 - 22:20

iBasso Cobra D10 Compact DAC and Headphone Amp has been available since early 2009. I have no idea how good it is. But it has one huge advantage. It is portable in real terms... While the DacPort needs your computer (you cannot power it with your iPod) the iBasso is battery powered. It has a Wolfson DAC chipset. They have many models, at half the price of the DacPort. Again, until we have comparisons to check their sound out, we just don't know.

See it here: http://www.ibasso.com/en/products/show.asp?ID=39

jeffrey@vog.com -- Thu, 08/19/2010 - 22:56

On nearly every score, you seem to prefer the HiFiMAN EF5. And yet you recommend the CEntrance DACport. In theory at least, a truly effective DAC should convert the digital USB signal from a computer into a much better analog signal than the rudimentary conversion that a laptop can natively perform; that's why many of us insist on (and pay for) a DAC to improve the output of our iPod. But you seem to have found no real advantage to the DACport besides its portability and ability to be powered through its USB connection. Is the presence of a good DAC worth nothing? Or does the CEentrance not have a particularly good DAC?

Chris Martens -- Tue, 09/14/2010 - 12:31

Hi Jeffrey,

As I see things, the HiFiMAN EF5 and CEntrance DACport are very, very different products.

The HiFiMAN EF5 is one of my favorite reasonably priced headphone amps. But note: it is a two-piece, AC-powered, tube-powered unit that is intended for desktop applications or for use in conjunction with high-end audio systems. It is NOT portable, and it does NOT contain a DAC of any kind.

The DACport is really two products in one, both of them ingeniously configured to be USB-powered (i.e., no AC power supply is needed). The DACport is, then, an extremely high-quality 24/96 USB DAC married to a very high-quality class A headphone amplifier, and it is portable, though it does need to be used with a laptop that provides full-fledged USB ports. As agb points out below, the DACport is not set up to be driven directly from an iPod (because the iPod is not, so far as I am aware, set up to provide power to an external device via USB).

Looking only at the headphone amplifier sections of the products, my nod would go to the HiFiMAN EF5; it sounds terrific. But taken as a whole, there's no denying the superior versatility (and portability) of the DACport.

To answer your two questions, yes, the presence of a good DAC is worth a lot (a whole lot in the case of the DACport), and yes, the CEntrance DAC is a very good one indeed. These are two of the reasons I recommended the product. The portability of the DACport is really compelling, too, and I like the fact that the USB interface cable is also the de facto power cable (I can't speak for you, by I find it's nice not to have to bring along a wall-wart-type power supply for the DACport when I travel).

'Hope this clarifies things somewhat.

Best, Chris Martens

Chris Martens
Editor, Avguide.com/Playback/The Perfect Vision 

jeffrey@vog.com -- Fri, 09/24/2010 - 21:36

Hi Chris,

Many thanks for your clarification. I've happily followed you for years in TAS. So perhaps you might answer:

The earphone output of the iPod is obviously analog and cannot benefit from a DAC. Various gadgets such as the Squeezebox are said to intercept the iPod's output as a digital stream, before it goes through the iPod's internal DAC. This is advantageous because the iPod's DAC is said to be of low quality. So,

1. Is this the case? How much better is the DAC in, say, the DACport? Or in the Squeezebox, for that matter.

2. Is the iPod's digital stream of sufficient quality to merit spending money on it?

3. If so, how can one get tap the iPod's digital data (through the oblong socket at the bottom) to use the DACport with it--the way the Squeezebox (and perhaps the Wadja) do?

4. Is the DACport's utility limited to headphones or can its analog output be sent to my (powered) desktop speakers? Or even to a large old stereo system?

Many thanks in advance, Chris.

Jeffrey Steingarten

jeffrey@vog.com -- Fri, 09/24/2010 - 21:36

Hi Chris,

Many thanks for your clarification. I've happily followed you for years in TAS. So perhaps you might answer:

The earphone output of the iPod is obviously analog and cannot benefit from a DAC. Various gadgets such as the Squeezebox are said to intercept the iPod's output as a digital stream, before it goes through the iPod's internal DAC. This is advantageous because the iPod's DAC is said to be of low quality. So,

1. Is this the case? How much better is the DAC in, say, the DACport? Or in the Squeezebox, for that matter.

2. Is the iPod's digital stream of sufficient quality to merit spending money on it?

3. If so, how can one get tap the iPod's digital data (through the oblong socket at the bottom) to use the DACport with it--the way the Squeezebox (and perhaps the Wadja) do?

4. Is the DACport's utility limited to headphones or can its analog output be sent to my (powered) desktop speakers? Or even to a large old stereo system?

Many thanks in advance, Chris.

Jeffrey Steingarten

wstallsmith@ear... -- Thu, 09/02/2010 - 11:38

agb in his comment says that the iPod Touch USB connection cannot supply needed power to the CEntrance DACport 24/96 DAC/Headphone Amplifier. Is this true? If so, the CEntrance would be of little use to me. Please clarify this point. Thanks.

Chris Martens -- Tue, 09/14/2010 - 12:40

Hi wstallsmith,

I believe agb is correct. The DACport is not set up to be driven directly from an iPod (because the iPod is not, so far as I am aware, set up to provide power to an external device via USB).

But note: if you like the general idea of the DACport but need something more iPod-friendly, watch for my upcoming Playback review of the iQube V2 DAC/headphone amplifier from the Dutch firm Qables. The iQube V2 provides both an analog input and a USB DAC input, and it is a battery-powered unit but with an interesting twist. Specifically, the unit is set up so that its battery is charged via its USB cable--not from a wall-wart-type power supply. Once charged up, however, the unit will continue to run even if the USB cable is disconnected. Thus, you can use it with an iPod, or feed it digital audio data directly from a computer. Pretty cool concept, no? Thus, the iQube V2 sort of "splits the difference" with the CEntrance approach.

Best, Chris Martens

Chris Martens
Editor, Avguide.com/Playback/The Perfect Vision 

wstallsmith@ear... -- Tue, 10/05/2010 - 13:37

Chris, many thanks for your response. I await your review of the Dutch device, which looks as if might answer my needs exactly. I hope that it might also be published in TAS, to which I have subscribed for years.

MikeMercer -- Fri, 12/09/2011 - 08:00

'm VERY excited to be a part of the CEntrance team now (have joined them as director of marketing)!! I had reviewed their DACPort myself, and loved it - plus: This review from Chris helped seal the deal for me!! NICE one Chris, as ALWAYS!!!!

Chris Martens -- Fri, 12/09/2011 - 15:52

Hi Mike,

Heartfelt congratulations on your new position with CEntrance. The DACport is quite an impressive component, both in terms of sound **and** build quality. That latter aspect is sometimes tricky to convey in a review, but it's the sort of thing you really notice when you live with the product for a time. (You find yourself asking questions like, "Is this about what I would get if, say, an aerospace company decided to build a portable DAC/amp."). 'Works for me.

Chris Martens
Editor, Avguide.com/Playback/The Perfect Vision 

MikeMercer -- Tue, 12/20/2011 - 15:03

Thanks Chris!!

I'm looking forward to keeping in close touch and getting you a CEntrance DACmini PX (DACmini plus a 25w per channel amp - which is voiced to work with these new CEntrance co-planar/coaxial desktop speakers (Masterclass 2502) I'm checking out right now - seeing if they pass my own acid test - thus far so good)!!!! As you know, I won't work for a company if I don't believe i their products - I'm not that good a salesman!!

All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1999 - 2011 NextScreen. All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.