CEntrance DACport 24/96 USB DAC/Headphone Amplifier (Playback 34)

True High-End Sound Goes Mobile

Amplifier Section:
• The DACport headphone amp uses a direct coupled (capacitor free) class A amplifier circuit said to maintain “audiophile quality all the way to the headphones.”
• Output power: 1.5 watts, said to be capable of driving even 600-Ohm headphones.
• Output impedance: 10 Ohms (which may cause interactions with some headphones that explain the sometimes slightly light bass balance we observed in some cases).
• Noise: The DACport is extremely quiet. Its noise floor tracks close to -130dB across most of the audio spectrum, gradually rising in the region from about 300Hz on down toe 20Hz, where noise climbs to approximately -112 dB—still a very low figure.
• 18V power supply: The DACport amplifier is fed by what CEntrance describes as “super-clean 18V rails (±9V, bipolar supply).”

About the DACport power supply:
CEntrance’s chief product architect Michael Goodman kept a development blog as the DACport was under design, and in the blog excerpts below he explains the unit’s distinctive USB-fed power supply in some detail.”

“…when you first plug it in, DACport starts in ‘low power’ mode and takes only about 60 mA of current on the 5V supply. In this startup mode it performs initial USB handshaking and then requests additional power…”

“Having performed initial USB handshaking, DACport requests full power, which is granted by the OS. That starts up the main switch-mode power supply that ramps up the 5V to +/-9V for the audio circuitry, +3.3V for the digital circuitry and clean +5V for the converter circuitry. In total, DACport has 5 (five) separate internal power supplies! That’s how we ensure that clean power is supplied to all circuitry to maintain the ultra-low distortion.”

“When designing the DACport we took a close look at the amount of power available from the USB jack. Typically it’s 5V x 500 mA, which results in 2.5 Watts of power. Not all of it is available for Audio however – in fact about 1 W is taken up by the digital and converter circuitry, so 1.5 Watts is the real Audio output power. In most cases, that’s plenty, since even the low-impedance headphones are very loud at 500 mW. DACport makes 1.5W available for audio.”

Physical:
• The DACport is housed in a handsomely finished tube-like extruded aluminum enclosure fitted with a flat-plate end cap on the input side (the plate provides a USB jack and power-on status light) and with a semi-conical metal plug on the output side that holds the ¼-inch output jack. Completing the pictures is a side-mounted soft-rubber volume control knob.
• The DACport is shaped (and roughly sized) like a high-tech, machine age, aluminum “cigar.” It is extremely compact, weighs just 72 grams, and would fit easily in a pocket, handbag, or computer case.
• Accessories include a low-EMI USB cable, a belt clip, and a felt carrying pouch.

 

SONIC CHARACTER

During my tests I used the DACport in its primary intended capacity; namely, as a combination DAC/headphone amp. For this reason, my comments on the DAC and amp sections of the DACport are, of course, intrinsically linked. Early on, I found that the DACport, like many other class A amplification devices, needs to be fully warmed up to sound its best. My comments, then, refer to a unit that has warmed up for between 15 – 30 minutes, or even more.

First off, let me say that the DACport is highly detailed and offers plenty of resolving power—more than do many of the standalone DACs that I’ve heard at or even well above its price point. If you enjoy components that can dig deep into digital recordings to extract very fine, low-level content and transient and/or textural details, the DACport will not disappoint. Also note—again, once fully warmed up—that the DACport exhibits virtually none of the upper midrange/treble shrillness or edginess you might encounter with some USB DACs. On the contrary, the DACport sounds as if it is ready, willing, and able to go toe-to-toe in competition with DACs that offer coaxial or TOSLINK S/PDIF interfaces. This, I suspect, is a quality attributable to CEntrance’s sophisticated USB interface and clock management technologies.

Upper mids and highs are very clean and clear sounding, and they exhibit a remarkable ability to resolve subtle echoes, reverb tails, or the leading edges of transient sounds (which can, for some DACs/amps, be very hard to get right). Upper mids and highs are also generally smooth, though warm-up certainly helps in this regard. You might find, however, that the upper end of the DACport’s response range sounds just a smidgeon brighter than the equivalent ranges as played through DACs/amps with tube output stages.

Comments

artk -- Thu, 08/12/2010 - 11:02

I'll bet if you did a double blind test of this against all those multithousand dollars dacs, no one would be able to tell the difference.

mariuscmorar@ya... -- Thu, 08/12/2010 - 15:13

Chris,

Thank you so much for your insights. I'm wandering how does the sound of CEntrance DACport compare to Emmeline "The Predator". Both are meant to be portable, both are DACs and have headphone amps with plenty of power. The Predator has a battery, the DACport doesn't, but beyond this specifications, how does the sound compare. Which sounds better?

Thanks again!

ctbarker32@gmail.com -- Thu, 08/12/2010 - 15:17

I'm glad TAS is finally giving some context for a product regarding price and performance. Unfortunately, your google skills seem lacking.

How about comparing to the HRT Music Streamer II USB Dac that is also 24b/96k and usb 1.1/2.0 capable? I have one and think it's sound quality is first rate and it only costs $150 for the "II" base model.

You may say "well there's no headphone amp" but you go on to compare the CEntrance to a full integrated amp that is far outside the product category of the CEntrance and the Music Streamer so I don't think I am off-base with my comparison.

I use my HRT Music Streamer II connected through a $70 TC Electronic Level Pilot passive volume control (very cool product TAS should check out!) into powered KRK Rokit 5 desktop monitors. I was amazed at the immediate sound improvement with this signal path. It was like I bought new speakers. MS II ($150) plus Level Pilot ($70) cost - $220. Quality of sound - priceless.

-CB

Chris Martens -- Tue, 09/14/2010 - 12:05

Hi ctbarker,

'Just wanted to point out that, while I often write for TAS, my review of the DACport was done under the auspices of TAS' sister digital publication, Playback (Playback specializes in desktop audio/headphones/small audio systems, etc.).

I also thought I'd mention that my google skills aren't as bad as you might think. But what those google skills tell me is that my colleague Hi-Fi+ Editor Alan Sircom has already done a thorough review of the HRT Music Streamer II and II+, so that I didn't think it necessary to revisit those products in Playback.

For your enjoyment, here's the link to Alan Sircom's review: http://www.avguide.com/review/hrt-streamer-ii-and-streamer-ii-hi-fi-72

Best, Chris Martens

Chris Martens
Editor, Avguide.com/Playback/The Perfect Vision 

agb -- Thu, 08/12/2010 - 22:20

iBasso Cobra D10 Compact DAC and Headphone Amp has been available since early 2009. I have no idea how good it is. But it has one huge advantage. It is portable in real terms... While the DacPort needs your computer (you cannot power it with your iPod) the iBasso is battery powered. It has a Wolfson DAC chipset. They have many models, at half the price of the DacPort. Again, until we have comparisons to check their sound out, we just don't know.

See it here: http://www.ibasso.com/en/products/show.asp?ID=39

jeffrey@vog.com -- Thu, 08/19/2010 - 22:56

On nearly every score, you seem to prefer the HiFiMAN EF5. And yet you recommend the CEntrance DACport. In theory at least, a truly effective DAC should convert the digital USB signal from a computer into a much better analog signal than the rudimentary conversion that a laptop can natively perform; that's why many of us insist on (and pay for) a DAC to improve the output of our iPod. But you seem to have found no real advantage to the DACport besides its portability and ability to be powered through its USB connection. Is the presence of a good DAC worth nothing? Or does the CEentrance not have a particularly good DAC?

Chris Martens -- Tue, 09/14/2010 - 12:31

Hi Jeffrey,

As I see things, the HiFiMAN EF5 and CEntrance DACport are very, very different products.

The HiFiMAN EF5 is one of my favorite reasonably priced headphone amps. But note: it is a two-piece, AC-powered, tube-powered unit that is intended for desktop applications or for use in conjunction with high-end audio systems. It is NOT portable, and it does NOT contain a DAC of any kind.

The DACport is really two products in one, both of them ingeniously configured to be USB-powered (i.e., no AC power supply is needed). The DACport is, then, an extremely high-quality 24/96 USB DAC married to a very high-quality class A headphone amplifier, and it is portable, though it does need to be used with a laptop that provides full-fledged USB ports. As agb points out below, the DACport is not set up to be driven directly from an iPod (because the iPod is not, so far as I am aware, set up to provide power to an external device via USB).

Looking only at the headphone amplifier sections of the products, my nod would go to the HiFiMAN EF5; it sounds terrific. But taken as a whole, there's no denying the superior versatility (and portability) of the DACport.

To answer your two questions, yes, the presence of a good DAC is worth a lot (a whole lot in the case of the DACport), and yes, the CEntrance DAC is a very good one indeed. These are two of the reasons I recommended the product. The portability of the DACport is really compelling, too, and I like the fact that the USB interface cable is also the de facto power cable (I can't speak for you, by I find it's nice not to have to bring along a wall-wart-type power supply for the DACport when I travel).

'Hope this clarifies things somewhat.

Best, Chris Martens

Chris Martens
Editor, Avguide.com/Playback/The Perfect Vision 

jeffrey@vog.com -- Fri, 09/24/2010 - 21:36

Hi Chris,

Many thanks for your clarification. I've happily followed you for years in TAS. So perhaps you might answer:

The earphone output of the iPod is obviously analog and cannot benefit from a DAC. Various gadgets such as the Squeezebox are said to intercept the iPod's output as a digital stream, before it goes through the iPod's internal DAC. This is advantageous because the iPod's DAC is said to be of low quality. So,

1. Is this the case? How much better is the DAC in, say, the DACport? Or in the Squeezebox, for that matter.

2. Is the iPod's digital stream of sufficient quality to merit spending money on it?

3. If so, how can one get tap the iPod's digital data (through the oblong socket at the bottom) to use the DACport with it--the way the Squeezebox (and perhaps the Wadja) do?

4. Is the DACport's utility limited to headphones or can its analog output be sent to my (powered) desktop speakers? Or even to a large old stereo system?

Many thanks in advance, Chris.

Jeffrey Steingarten

jeffrey@vog.com -- Fri, 09/24/2010 - 21:36

Hi Chris,

Many thanks for your clarification. I've happily followed you for years in TAS. So perhaps you might answer:

The earphone output of the iPod is obviously analog and cannot benefit from a DAC. Various gadgets such as the Squeezebox are said to intercept the iPod's output as a digital stream, before it goes through the iPod's internal DAC. This is advantageous because the iPod's DAC is said to be of low quality. So,

1. Is this the case? How much better is the DAC in, say, the DACport? Or in the Squeezebox, for that matter.

2. Is the iPod's digital stream of sufficient quality to merit spending money on it?

3. If so, how can one get tap the iPod's digital data (through the oblong socket at the bottom) to use the DACport with it--the way the Squeezebox (and perhaps the Wadja) do?

4. Is the DACport's utility limited to headphones or can its analog output be sent to my (powered) desktop speakers? Or even to a large old stereo system?

Many thanks in advance, Chris.

Jeffrey Steingarten

wstallsmith@ear... -- Thu, 09/02/2010 - 11:38

agb in his comment says that the iPod Touch USB connection cannot supply needed power to the CEntrance DACport 24/96 DAC/Headphone Amplifier. Is this true? If so, the CEntrance would be of little use to me. Please clarify this point. Thanks.

Chris Martens -- Tue, 09/14/2010 - 12:40

Hi wstallsmith,

I believe agb is correct. The DACport is not set up to be driven directly from an iPod (because the iPod is not, so far as I am aware, set up to provide power to an external device via USB).

But note: if you like the general idea of the DACport but need something more iPod-friendly, watch for my upcoming Playback review of the iQube V2 DAC/headphone amplifier from the Dutch firm Qables. The iQube V2 provides both an analog input and a USB DAC input, and it is a battery-powered unit but with an interesting twist. Specifically, the unit is set up so that its battery is charged via its USB cable--not from a wall-wart-type power supply. Once charged up, however, the unit will continue to run even if the USB cable is disconnected. Thus, you can use it with an iPod, or feed it digital audio data directly from a computer. Pretty cool concept, no? Thus, the iQube V2 sort of "splits the difference" with the CEntrance approach.

Best, Chris Martens

Chris Martens
Editor, Avguide.com/Playback/The Perfect Vision 

wstallsmith@ear... -- Tue, 10/05/2010 - 13:37

Chris, many thanks for your response. I await your review of the Dutch device, which looks as if might answer my needs exactly. I hope that it might also be published in TAS, to which I have subscribed for years.

MikeMercer -- Fri, 12/09/2011 - 08:00

'm VERY excited to be a part of the CEntrance team now (have joined them as director of marketing)!! I had reviewed their DACPort myself, and loved it - plus: This review from Chris helped seal the deal for me!! NICE one Chris, as ALWAYS!!!!

Chris Martens -- Fri, 12/09/2011 - 15:52

Hi Mike,

Heartfelt congratulations on your new position with CEntrance. The DACport is quite an impressive component, both in terms of sound **and** build quality. That latter aspect is sometimes tricky to convey in a review, but it's the sort of thing you really notice when you live with the product for a time. (You find yourself asking questions like, "Is this about what I would get if, say, an aerospace company decided to build a portable DAC/amp."). 'Works for me.

Chris Martens
Editor, Avguide.com/Playback/The Perfect Vision 

MikeMercer -- Tue, 12/20/2011 - 15:03

Thanks Chris!!

I'm looking forward to keeping in close touch and getting you a CEntrance DACmini PX (DACmini plus a 25w per channel amp - which is voiced to work with these new CEntrance co-planar/coaxial desktop speakers (Masterclass 2502) I'm checking out right now - seeing if they pass my own acid test - thus far so good)!!!! As you know, I won't work for a company if I don't believe i their products - I'm not that good a salesman!!

All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1999 - 2011 NextScreen. All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.