<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TAS Reviews the Usher S-520 Loudspeaker</title>
	<link>http://www.avguide.com/news/2007/11/06/tas-reviews-the-usher-s-520-loudspeaker/</link>
	<description>Fresh daily content for AVguide.com</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 00:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Boyd Cardwell</title>
		<link>http://www.avguide.com/news/2007/11/06/tas-reviews-the-usher-s-520-loudspeaker/#comment-9528</link>
		<dc:creator>Boyd Cardwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.avguide.com/news/2007/11/06/tas-reviews-the-usher-s-520-loudspeaker/#comment-9528</guid>
		<description>The Ushers, with the new improved specifications smaller size, along with a better performance of
studio montoring, they actaully save time and money; I have replaced all my studios
with them, look out JBL, new kid is on the block.
Boyd</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Ushers, with the new improved specifications smaller size, along with a better performance of<br />
studio montoring, they actaully save time and money; I have replaced all my studios<br />
with them, look out JBL, new kid is on the block.<br />
Boyd</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
