I am seriously considering getting a Nottingham 294 to use with my Grado Reference cartridge but I had a few concerns after reading the review of the innerspace Jr. in this months issue. It seems as if it received a pretty bad review and was mostly faulted for it's odd quirks which the reviewer seemed to despise. My question is how could the 294 be recommended as one the "the best" in the same magazine that reviewed the innerspace as having features that are "inexcusably stupid"? It seems to me that the entire Nottingham line uses the same designs that Paul Seydor was ripping apart. Am I missing something?