The Best System I’ve Ever Heard in a Studio (or perhaps anywhere!)

Posted by: Jim Hannon at 1:01 pm, April 6th, 2011

Much to my dismay, I have found that most systems in recording studios are sonically underwhelming and do not come close to satisfying demanding audiophiles. I had assumed that the sound in a mastering studio would produce similar results, so imagine my surprise when I visited one of the studios of Paul Stubblebine Mastering and Michael Romanowski Mastering and was treated to perhaps the best system I’ve heard anywhere. Paul and Michael use this room for The Tape Project mastering, and it undoubtedly is a major factor in their ability to produce such incredible-sounding tapes. To cut right to the chase, the system I heard in this studio comes as close to the sound of a live performance (or more correctly, the sound of the master tape) as perhaps any I have heard.

(Editor's Note: Except for the stock shot below, my apologies for the fuzzy images from the camera that I borrowed. However, the imaging from the system was of reference quality!)

 

The playback chain in the mastering studio during my visit consisted of an Ampex 1” tape transport playing The Tape Project working masters, fed into some custom EAR electronics designed by Tim de Paravicini routed by a Manley Backbone into a Grace Design m904 master volume control. From there the signal went into ultra-modified Meyer parametric filter sets to the prodigious VTL Siegfried Reference Monoblocks, connected by Siltech Emperor Crown speaker cables to the majestic Focal Grande Utopia EM loudspeakers. MIT interconnects and power centers were also used quite effectively.

One of the keys to the great sound was that Bob Hodas, working in conjunction with Paul and Michael, effectively took the room out of the equation. He said, “"We settled on a basic room size and then on several occasions throughout the construction process measured the room to determine what acoustic treatments would be required and where the speakers wanted to be placed.” Bob contends that for any given room there is really one "best" spot for the speakers and listener. The goal was to create a room that was controlled but still produced an open and natural feeling. Without getting into too many specifics of his secret sauce, Bob used a combination of absorption and diffusion on the walls to pick off some first order reflections, while maintaining the room energy and hung some bass traps in the ceiling that according to Bob, “work in a broadband fashion.” He employed a Meyer SIM3 analyzer to examine the impulse response of the speakers and then the room’s reflection patterns. Phase and frequency response were studied in 1/48th octave resolution, and final adjustments were done with some highly modified Meyer parametric filters. Bob says that using this method, facilitated by the flexibility of the Focal Grand Utopia EM modules, he could fine tune the system to exactly what Paul and Michael wanted in order to hear the detail and linearity needed for their mastering work.

Not surprisingly the best spot for the listener is at the monitoring console, which is one-third of the way out from the rear wall. The large Focal Grande Utopia EM speakers are fairly close to the opposite wall (no Pearson Rule of Thirds here) and my first thought was, “This can’t work, with such large speakers so close to the back wall.” Boy was I mistaken, as the sound was just breathtaking. Listening to The Tape Project’s Arnold Overtures, the system produced sound that was “effortless” with wall-to-wall soundstaging and very precise, yet natural, focus. Massed strings were delicately articulated with space around the performers and the sections of the orchestra. Here’s a system that had tremendous low-end extension, but where everything was very well controlled with amazing top-to-bottom balance and neutrality.

 

Driven by the superb VTL Siegfried Reference Monoblocks, it felt like the system had unlimited dynamics without any compression, at times making it seem like the percussionists were in the room. The highs were beautiful and articulate, allowing the overtones to bloom and decay wonderfully, which helped produce an uncannily realistic and mesmerizing sound. There was a natural, relaxed flow to the presentation, as in a live concert, and it was so engaging that it sucked me in. No other combination of source, system, and room in my experience has created the illusion that I was sitting in the audience at the symphony better than this one. Admittedly, you don’t feel the pressure of low frequency waves against your breastbone like you do in the live event, but this system moves a lot of air.

Comments

art noxon -- Fri, 04/22/2011 - 19:49

Could anything be more gorgeous? Nothing like a professional “stock photos”.

Wait a minute, what’s that screwy thing behind the speaker in the main picture? It looks like a sound panel in the corner. Now that I’m looking, a little peek behind the other speaker, the right speaker, shows a panel that is definitely laid across the corner. I’ll bet it’s a…well, it certainly looks like it might be an economy model, floor to ceiling corner loaded bass trap.

Any a 2” sound panel, when it gets laid across the corner, becomes a mild mannered corner loaded bass trap. Those panels looked pretty tricked out, finished to blend in and look like the wall; similar color scheme and a chair railing stripe. They cost a bundle.

Now take a look at both photos on the second page. Those are the one the author took.. Wait a minute…No bass trap. Whut hoppened?

Let me get this straight. One day the system was so beautiful they took stock pictures of it and there was floor to ceiling corner loaded bass traps behind the speakers. The very next day someone came over and pulled them out?

Or it is reversed, the author listened to the room and took photos when there were no bass traps in the corners and by the time the stock photo was shot, the acoustics of the room had been changed.

Or, was the….

So now we are all wondering, just when did the room sound fantastic? Before the floor to ceiling corner loaded bass traps were built and installed or after the floor to ceiling corner loaded bass traps were built and installed?

And, when ever it was that the room didn’t sound fantastic, how awful did it sound?

And mainly, were those huge bass traps in the room during the listening event or not in the room?

Or does the room sound fantastic both with and without a huge corner loaded bass traps behind the speakers and the bass traps are actually meaningless. .

I sense a back story here. Feel like I’m in the old movie “Blowup”. How letting us in on what going on. Clearly, something is going on here and it might revolve around getting great looking speakers to sound right when they have been stuffed into a corner.

It may not be about the voice of the speaker at all. It may be about side to side mode buildup control. Speakers tight to either side wall stimulate the second harmonic of the width every time they move. It’s the old one note bass syndrome. Could that be the reason the floor to ceiling bass traps were added?

Floor to ceiling traps absorb energy out of the build of vertical standing waves. Not much but some. Clearly there is no bass trap on the ceiling, unless it is disguised and behind the ceiling. Could the reason the corner bass trap is floor to ceiling be because it dampens down the vertical mode buildup, or was it just a cosmetic choice.

Floor to ceiling bass traps in the front of the room also dampen front to rear mode buildup, and speakers in the front, tight to the front, love to build up all of the front to back modes possible. Oh, are there any floor to ceiling bass traps at the back of the room? Just what does happen to all that energy after it rips by the engineer?

Yes, lots of beautiful equipment and great sound but the acoustic package in that room is equipment too. Without it, the speakers can’t play even one clear note.

I feel like Acoustico Columbo, Sonic PI….just who killed the bass, where, when and why?

Art Noxon
Inventor of the TubeTrap and President of Acoustic Sciences Corp

Bodyslam -- Tue, 04/26/2011 - 02:45

Hey Art,
Nice to hear from you.

But you're doing a lot of speculating based in "information" that just isn't true. The corner treatments are in the room at all times--have been ever since we built the room eight years ago. In Jim's second shot on page two he had just moved around toward the front of the room enough that the speaker covers the panel. If you look closely you can just see the edge of it poking up above the top of the speaker.

The photos don't do a very good job of conveying how the room is actually built. The "stock" photo was taken by a professional photographer for the cover of Mix magazine. He used an extreme wide angle lens, and did a great job of capturing a lot of detail considering that he just couldn't back up far enough to get it all. However, those wide angle shots distort relationships of space and distance pretty severely. And I wouldn't try to divine the dimensions of the room out of Jim's photos either.

It would take a long article to cover the whole acoustic design of the room, but I'll just mention a couple of points. The ceiling you see in the front of the room in the "stock" photo is not the actual height of the room. We built a soffit ceiling around the edge, with a large opening in the center. Notice that gridwork? That's there to create a visual impression of a ceiling at about eleven feet, but it's acoustically open to the actual ceiling at eighteen feet. There are bass traps up in the area above the soffit and grid. There are membrane absorbers on the front and rear walls to address a front-to-back bass hump. There is a great deal of diffusion on all the walls--it's just camouflaged so it doesn't show up in the pictures. It has some other points of interest as well, which I'd be happy to show you if you ever come down for a visit.

For those who don't know, I'm the original owner of the room. Though now it's my partner Michael Romanowski's room, and I just do sessions there occasionally, I am intimately familiar with the construction of the room. And my friendship with Art Noxon goes back almost to the invention of the TubeTrap. When his company was very young I was instrumental in getting them their first national distribution, with Monster Cable. And the first time I had a chance to check out what TubeTraps can do, I took them into the mastering room I was operating at the time, in a studio called The Automatt in San Francisco.

Cheers,
Paul Stubblebine
______________
www.paulstubblebine.com
www.tapeproject.com

art noxon -- Wed, 04/27/2011 - 12:09

Hi Paul,

Great hearing from you. Yes, I was messing around (speculating) and causing trouble. But look what I dug up, a clear description of what's behind the scrim cloth. The audiophile side of playback just doesn't understand how much acoustics it takes to get systems to run right. They tend to look at the glitter, the cables, amps, players and of course speakers. Thanks to you, they have had the opportunity to get a peek at the rest of the story. Mastering rooms are extremely high performance listening rooms. And the extreme part of these systems is not the audio gear, it's the acoustic support for the audio gear.

And, Paul, I'm always happy when I remember our early days together. You know that anyway...

Art Noxon
Invented TubeTrap, Pres of ASC
www.acousticsciences.com

art noxon -- Wed, 04/27/2011 - 17:22

 
In your review of the Holm DSP unit I noticed that you suggested twice, in different areas of the article that DSP works best in a “soft” room. You also said that your room is “acoustically treated” and speakers are properly placed, and because of this the DSP worked well. I think it is great that you keep connecting the dots between Room Acoustic Treatment and DSP correction. I’d like to amplify that point, because it is my experience that the room acoustic treatment part of the equation for DSP success keeps getting swept under the rug.  
 
A background read for all DSP correctofiles is the TAS ROUNDTABLE published in TAS Oct/Nov 2004 and titled: Room Acoustics: Audio’s Final Frontier.   
 
Yes, that was some time ago, but the physical principles involved in this topic remain as true today as back then. Robert Harley was the moderator. I of ASC/TubeTrap represented room acoustics. Peter Lyngdorf of TacT Audio represented DSP room correction and you will remember that you, yourself, Robert E Greene, TAS senior writer, represented the audiophile perspective. 
 
The consensus was that Room Acoustics + DSP Correction = Audible Improvement. DSP alone is not the fix. Robert Harley summarized: “So we still need acoustic treatments and correct loudspeaker placement - DSP room correction isn’t the magic bullet.” 
 
Peter Lyngdorf’s expression of that consensus was that “…with the proper EQ and proper setup of speakers you can really make a piano sound like it is in front of you. And I don’t think that is possible unless you use both a sensible room treatment and very sophisticated DSP equalization.”
 
And so, begs the question: What does it take for a room to be suitably “soft” or “sensibly” treated, sufficient for DSP to actually do some real good? 
 
REG, your definition of “soft” seems to be: Free from strong hard surface, early reflections. You opened with this definition in your review of the DSPeaker review.   And one of your contributions to the above roundtable discussion was that your first acoustic upgrade choice is to absorb or otherwise get rid of hard early reflections.  But this was strictly about treble range sound. And now, with DSP we are only talking about the bass range, not about treble. And so, when you say that a room needs to be “acoustically soft” for DSP to work, you mean the room has to have bass traps, a sensible amount of bass traps, so to speak, and get them placed in the proper locations, corners. 
 
We all know what this means. You want at a minimum high efficiency corner loaded bass traps. With the TacT corner loaded speaker, you’ll put big bass traps up at the ceiling, in each of the 4 corners of the room. This leads to the possibly of continuing the bass trap system all around the room, up long the ceiling wall corner. This would create some sort of an acoustic soffit kind of bass trap setup. This is good, because a soffit is an architectural feature, which completely disguises the fact that it is a huge bass trap.
 
With more traditional DSP setups, the speakers are out in the room, not tight to the corners. Here, sensible bass trapping could still be the soffit bass trap, but it also could be 4 floor to ceiling corner loaded bass traps.     
 
This is an important point that I, in particular, think needs to be clarified, specifically clarified.  When people say “yes, we need some room treatment so we can get great results out of DSP Room Correction” they are saying “yes, we need a sensible amount of BASS TRAPS loaded into the room, enough BASS TRAPS to soften it up in the bottom end,  so we can give DSP Room Correction a chance to get its job done. 
 
I wish sales people, distributors, marketeers and reviewers and the card carrying audiophiles would just say the B word once in a while. If they would just tell the whole story the way it actually is. Then they’d be saying something like…we need some serious manly bass traps loaded into this room before we can even think about lighting off the DSP.  
 
Art Noxon
Invented TubeTraps, Pres of ASC
www.acousticsciences.com

JKStraw -- Thu, 04/28/2011 - 16:20

 I had to laugh at how a little movement by the cameraman could cause such a trick on the eye. The first picture made the panel look like it came out farther than it did.
Beautiful system none the less. I have always wanted to win the lotto to put the JM Lab/Focals Grand Utopias in my home. I have owned JM Lab ( I will never get use to just calling them Focal) since I first bought a pair of 3.1 Dalines back in the '90s. They still sound incredible with my old Arcam A65 Diva and rDAC!

JA FANT -- Thu, 05/12/2011 - 21:42

Gorgeous!

All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1999 - 2011 NextScreen. All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.