Like many of you, I’ve enjoyed reading about my colleague Jonathan Valin’s experiences with the Magico Mini stand-mount monitors, versions 1 and 2. Something there is in me, and perhaps in many of us, that loves a giant killer—a product that, although small of stature, delivers lion-hearted performance. The only catch with the Magicos, however, is that their price is every bit as “lion-hearted” as their performance is; selling for north of $20k/pair, the Magico Minis obviously aren’t for everyone.
Yet the basic appeal of the Magico Mini concept remains: who wouldn’t love a very well made, 2-way, stand-mount monitor that offers most of the essentials of big speaker performance, but in a smaller (and presumably less expensive) package? It seems to me, then, that some of us must surely be searching for what I’ll term a “po’ boy’s Magico Mini”—that is, something conceptually similar to the Mini, but at a much, much, much lower price point.
Actually, out here in the real world, we’re not really talking about finding speakers for “po’ boys” at all; we’re simply talking about finding good loudspeaker options for people who would rather limit their speaker investments to about $2k/pair (which most folks would consider lavish), rather than to >$20k/pair (which most folks would consider an extravagance up in the Sultan of Brunei stratosphere).
This week, I’m pleased to report that, in the course of working on a product review for the upcoming Playback 20, I’ve happened upon a moderately priced stand-mount monitor speaker that, in my opinion, offers exceptional value for money. The speaker is KEF’s XQ20 stand-mount monitor ($2000/pair), which I also highlighted in the CES 2009 budget speaker report I wrote for The Absolute Sound (issue 192).
KEF’s XQ20 is a gorgeous and modestly sized 2-way, bass-reflex monitor based on an updated version of the firm’s signature Uni-Q driver (where a small dome tweeter is mounted coaxially within the throat of an associated mid-bass driver). Interestingly, the speaker at once does and doesn’t sound like the KEF’s that have preceded it. It preserves KEF’s hallmark natural sound and neutral tonal balance, yet loses the quality of polite, British reticence that sometimes has been associated with the KEF brand in the past. Instead, the XQ20 sounds remarkably open and, well, explicit in its approach to sound reproduction, which in my view is a good thing. The net result: a speaker that sounds natural and full-bodied yet that is transparent and intensely well focused. And did I mention that it’s a dynamite imager, too?
When I first installed the KEFs in my reference system, they took the place of some very good floorstanders priced around $8k/pair. Right off the bat, the little KEFs either equaled or outperformedtheir more costly counterparts in terms of clarity, focus, transparency, tautness of bass, and a bunch of other performance parameters (though the bigger speakers did offer deeper bass extension and a certain “cut-from-whole-cloth” sonic integrity that was very appealing). But my broader point is that the KEFs stood as compact 2-way monitors that, in very many respects, could go toe-to-toe with very good floorstanders roughly four times their price.
Impressed, but also seeking independent confirmation of my findings, I invited a colleague (who owns Usher Be-718s, among other speakers) to hear the KEFs, and after he listened to them for a while he said, “you know, these might be even higher-end speakers than the Ushers are.” In my book that’s saying a mouthful, because I feel the Usher Be-718s, which sell for about $800 more per pair than the KEFs do, are not only a class-leading product but also extraordinary overachievers in their own right. But the very fact that my colleague saw fit to compare the XQ20s with the Ushers in the first place speaks volumes, giving you some idea of just how good—and how musically expressive—the KEFs really are.
The bottom line is that the XQ20s offer tons of musical goodness/dollar and are real lookers into the bargain (see the inserted photo). What’s not to like about that? Stay tuned for the full review in Playback 20.
Comments
where's the tweeter?
As you can read in the comment: "a small dome tweeter is mounted coaxially within the throat of an associated mid-bass driver". Onother words: in the center of the mid-bass cone as you can see.
With KEF’s sophisticated elliptical dome tweeter mounted in the acoustic centre of the bass/midrange cone, the latest Uni-Q® array with ‘tangerine’ waveguide disperses an uncannily accurate sound image throughout the room with startling clarity[.]
The Uni-Q array is an idea KEF "borrowed" from Tannoy, who has been using the dual concentric horn in it's speakers for decades.
Though Tannoy is known for their use of coaxial drivers or motors, the US led the way in early coaxial designs, with a patent in 1933. By the 1970’s, great coax designs like the UREI 811 & 813 were available, made in ye olde US of A…
Nicksonic,
You pose a good question and one that has caused more than few audiophiles to do double-takes when looking at this speaker. If you check out the photo above, you'll notice what appears to be sort of a wire-frame "cage" positioned down in the throat of the mid-bass driver. Behind that "cage" (which is actually KEF's new "tangerine" waveguide), you can see the protruding tip of the dome tweeter.
The concept of this design is to do three things. First, the tweeter is positioned so that it is coaxial with the woofer; that is, it is mounted on exactly the same center-line axis as the woofer is. Second, the fore and aft positioning of the tweeter is designed to time-align the tweeter with the woofer. Third, the tangerine waveguide is designed to give the tweeter dispersion characteristics similar to those of the woofer at the crossover point between the two drivers.
The bottom line is that KEF is pursuing a design philosophy where, to the greatest extent possible, two drivers sound much like one, big full-range driver.
Chris Martens,
Editor, Playback
Chris Martens
Editor, Avguide.com/Playback/The Perfect Vision
Am I the only one having a problem with the wording "Tangerine"?
With all the available fruit names, why did they chose the same as Altec when they introduced the Tangerine Phase plug on their horns?
Tanto,
'Good catch on that point! I'd forgotten that the term "tangerine" had been used elsewhere in a similar (though not exactly identical) context. Interesting...
In any event, though, the good news is that KEF's "tangerine" waveguide does appear to function pretty much as advertised. I've found that imaging with the XQ20s holds up surprisingly well--even when you move off to the side from the central "sweet spot" or stand up to stretch your legs during a listening session.
Chris Martens
Chris Martens
Editor, Avguide.com/Playback/The Perfect Vision
How would those with experience in the audio world rate these against B&W's 805s?
The XQ50 is the best practical centre channel loudspeaker that I have auditioned. First Class Raymond would be proud of this design.