We recently received and hooked up the Micromega WM-10, an unassuming black box that seems to be exactly what a lot of people are looking for (even if they don’t know it yet). The WM-10 was launched at CES 2010 and offers the ability to play high quality audio streams remotely using the WiFi (802.11n) wireless system.

Some people find the parts and pieces of computer audio a bit confusing. So, before we get into the WM-10 specifically, let’s review the general idea on offer here.
Products like the WM-10 assume that the customer has (or is willing to buy) a music server. A music server is a device for:
Since a music server can be configured using an existing PC or Mac, almost everyone is in the situation of having a music server. Audiophiles may wish to have a dedicated music server, of course, to avoid competition for resources between computing activities and music activities.
A music server could be hard wired to a D/A converter and from there be plugged into amplifier and speakers or headphones. As an alternative, one could purchase a music client (also known as a networked music player or music streamer). Here we use the term music client because it fits the server-client metaphor borrowed from computing (where the server is the base for massive central data storage and organization and the clients are remote devices for viewing and lightly manipulating data). The music client receives music data streams from the music server over some kind of network connection and then performs D/A conversion for input to an existing audio system.
So, in summary, the WM-10 is a music client. It is designed to work with a music server (e.g., a WiFi-enabled Mac with iTunes). The WM-10 receives WiFi music streams from the server and does D/A conversion. You plug the WM-10 into your preamp or receiver via a stereo analog connection. You control the songs that are being streamed from the server using an iPod Touch or iPhone.

With the above in mind, the concept of the WM-10 is pretty simple. The first idea is that audiophiles probably want their PC and their audio system in different rooms. This isn’t some whole house audio lifestyle B.S.; rather, it is a desirable choice because PC components tend to be noisy and the easiest way to deal with this is to relegate PC items to another room. It can also be a practical matter. Audio equipment is often in a more relaxed living space in the home than computer gear--which more often than not is assigned to a functional workspace. The WM-10 is therefore conceived as a remote client.
The second idea of the WM-10 is that such remote clients should be wireless. Many homes are not fully wired with Ethernet connections in all the right places, so wireless connectivity is simply the easier way to go. One could use AC powerline networking, but some designers are concerned about how easily and well this works.
The third notion behind the WM-10 is that audiophiles will want a high quality music client if they want one at all. While the WM-10 starts life as a humble Apple Airport Express, Micromega has redesigned it in two critical areas. Micromega has installed a higher quality power supply, and they’ve redesigned the clock circuitry for better D/A performance. When we get down to listening, I’ll address whether these changes merit the significant price premium that Micromega asks for the WM-10 (the WM-10 is $1595).
While on the subject of quality, I would add that Micromega chose the Airport Express because it uses an excellent chipset, which is capable of decoding 24bit/176k and 24bit/192k high-resolution files. As a practical matter, this is more a future-proofing capability than something you can use right now. The Apple Airtunes protocol currently limits you to 44.1kHz/16-bit data rates via WiFi, though future Airtunes updates are expected to allow significantly higher resolution data rates.
Comments
How does this differ from Squeezebox? Transporter? What's new here?
Is there any solid evidence that Apple will enable 24/96 streaming over wifi?
The only thing new is the pricetag. This is just an Apple AirPort in a bigger case with "better power supply", "better clock" and a coax SPDIF instad of Toslink. Is this needed, does it really work better and does it justify the huge markup? They should tone down the initial press release (was posted here) because it's at least misleading. Somebody from the press needs to call these for what they are.
I've been using a Squeeze box for 3 years and I'mvery happywith the sound.
The squeezebox has SPdiff coax digital output that I connect to my receiver.
I don't know what advantage can the micromega bring
It's unclear how this product is "a noticeable step forward from an Airport Express or a Logitech Squeezebox" especially at this price!
Does anything from AVG cost less than $1000?
Unbelievable that it does not have its own DAC! An Airport Express in a big box with upgraded power supply and a clocking tweak. Yes, I'd dearly like to use iTunes to stream via wifi or Ethernet to a decent DAC (versus other choices like Squeezebox which do not work with iTunes; or USB DACs which need to be close to the computer), but I do not think that Micromega is offering enough value here.
It does have a DAC...
"The WM-10 receives WiFi music streams from the server and does D/A conversion. You plug the WM-10 into your preamp or receiver via a stereo analog connection."
Yes, it has a DAC, the one that is on Aitport Express and feeds the standard mini-jack/Toslink output on it. There is no other DAC according to the first part of the review and their press release. I doubt that there is even a secondary audio buffer, couldn't discern by looking at the PCB photo on the press release.
Yes, it has a DAC, the one that is on Aitport Express and feeds the standard mini-jack/Toslink output on it. There is no other DAC according to the first part of the review and their press release. I doubt that there is even a secondary audio buffer, couldn't discern by looking at the PCB photo on the press release.
Is the upgraded clock anything like the Micromega Stage 6 clock ? If it is then it should sound out of this world.
or try Sonos!!! use your iphone or itouch as controller if you wish. Listen to your itunes or any internet sourced music...any radio station in the world, rhapsody, pandora and much more. Terrific sound, it's own dedicated wireless network, control multiple rooms, listen to multiple music in different rooms, sync as many or as few rooms as you wish. And easy to install!! I mean really easy!! $350. Similar to Squeezebox only a thousand times better. do I love my Sonos? absolutely!!
If anyone is interested in getting a personal demo of this device in a nice system, come see us at Axpona March 5 - 7, 2010 in Jacksonville, FL at the Wyndham Hotel (axpona.com). We'll have it on demo with a pair of Focal-JMlabs Electra 1028BE floorstanding speakers driven by a Pathos InPol-2. The system will be in room 265 and we'll have a booth on the main floor as well. If you email me and mention this post, I've got two (2) free day passes for you, FCFS. Tom, I'd be interested in hearing your opinion of the sound quality before then. My source tells me he's compared it to Red Book CD players using the original CD as the CD source and the ripped version on a MacBook as the streamed source, and he didn't hear a difference. I can't wait to audition this piece with a ripped copy of MFSL Dark Side of the Moon, The Great Gig in the Sky. WLYUKID
Michael Breeden, CEO, Beyond Audio
www.beyondaudiojax.com
I'm back from a trip out of town, so I should get to a comparison over the weekend. I have the EMM Labs CDSA and the Berkeley DAC in house now, so I should be able to comment on sound vs. known good DACs. I'm also picking up an Airport Express to see what the advantage of the Micromega changes is (if any).
CEO and Editorial Director, Nextscreen LLC
Tom,
Hey, that's two weekends ago! How did it sound?
Thanks,
Daniel
I haven't heard from Tom yet either, but Axpona is now less than two weeks away. Are you able to make it to Jacksonville March 5-7? If you can, let me know what day and I'll set a day pass aside for you at the will call. Also, I'll be posting the results of my own listening tests here after the show.
Michael Breeden, CEO, Beyond Audio
www.beyondaudiojax.com
Sorry for the delay. A few parts needed didn't arrive on time (the normal course in reviewing). Simple summary (using only Red Book files): the EMM sounds better than the WM-10, but the difference is small -- mostly the WM-10 sounds slightly more mellow. Because of the delays, I haven't tried the Berkeley yet. I did try the Airport Express too. It sounds different from the WM-10, though again the differences are small. I would say the Airport Express has some of the liveliness of the EMM, but lacks the smoothness and resolution. The WM-10 gives up some liveliness to get some of the smoothness and resolution of the EMM.
Note that the differences I'm talking about are small, which in the context of DACs means they don't show up on every track. In fact, you need to look for the right tracks to hear the differences. On many tracks you'd be hard pressed to hear any difference. I find this especially true of music with limited HF content. This is the case with almost every DAC, but it is important background information if you try comparisons yourself.
CEO and Editorial Director, Nextscreen LLC
Thanks. Putting aside the WM-10 for a moment, and if I understand this correctly, you're saying that the $99 Airport Express using the Airport Express DAC sounds "close" to the EMM?
-- Daniel
I'd suggest not confusing small differences with meaningful differences. This is a conceptual distinction we're trying to standardize on; sorry if it seems new.
I think on a lot of material many listeners would struggle to hear a big difference between the Airport Express and the EMM. Then along comes this disc or that disc and you go "oh, I see". But the other question we should ask is "do you need that difference?" I'm trying to convey that for a lot of systems the answer is probably "no" because the extra money would do more applied elsewhere.
CEO and Editorial Director, Nextscreen LLC
Just to clarify, the article says that Airtunes will not transmit 176k/24bit and 192k/24bit files (so-called ultra high res files) at this time. This is not the same as saying it won't transmit lossless files. It will transmit 44.1k/16 bit files (in Apple Lossless compression mode, I believe).
Similarly, the basis for the WM-10 (Airport Express) and the changes are clearly spelled out, as is the plan to evaluate the impact of these changes.
As they say, remedial reading and politeness classes begin after lunch.
CEO and Editorial Director, Nextscreen LLC
It does have it's own DAC as the analog signal from the Airport Express is not used. It's a Cirrus Logic 4344 I believe. It will take the digital output from the airport express, reclock it to reduce/eliminate jitter, and then feed it to the DAC, which supports up to 24/192 sample rates. I'm sure if I am wrong, I'll be corrected, but this is what I've been told.
so basically.... its an appletv -without the tv at 7 or 8 times the price?? the appletv paired with a 1k$ DAC of your choice would most likely sound significantly better than this option while also providing an extensive amount of extras (i.e. movies, internet radio, etc)
Only single ended out. If they're gonnas go through the trouble of making this 802.n then why not RJ45 as well?
If you are looking for a real high end replay system ,Just check the Bladelius Embla Replay Player.