First Listen: Phiaton PS 200 in-ear headphones

Posted by: Chris Martens at 1:01 pm, April 11th, 2009

Phiaton (pronounced fee‛ ah ton) is a subsidiary of the South Korean consumer electronics giant Cresyn Company, Limited, and as near as I can tell the firm is intent on making its mark in the world of high-performance headphones and other portable audio products. At present, the company’s product offerings fall in two groups: the “Primal Series” models, which are targeted toward the high-end community, and the “Moderna Series” models, which are construed more as visually appealing “lifestyle” products. But the models that caught my attention, from the Primal Series group, of course, are the PS 200 in-ear headphones with an MSRP of $249. The PS 200’s will be one of my review subjects for Playback issue 20.
 
Technically, the PS 200 has two distinguishing features: first, the headphone are driven by “dual balanced armature drivers with a passive crossover,” and second, they incorporate an “acoustic impedance control mechanism (that) opens and closes holes on the rear side of the speaker unit,” thus changing the acoustical impedance of the speaker enclosure to “improve low frequency sound.” While the PS 200 is by no means the first dual-armature headphone on the market (three others that immediately come to mind are the Klipsch Custom 3’s, the Shure SE 420’s, and the Ultmate Ears SuperFi 5Pro’s), I found it impressive that a relative newcomer to the high-end in-ear headphone marketplace would lead off with a product incorporating this relative complex technology.
 
I’m still in the midst of my review listening with the PS 200’s, so I don’t want rush to judgment, but I can tell you that they are very revealing and detailed. The bigger question I’m wrestling with involves their overall tonal balance and bass output, which is extremely dependent on fit (more so than is the case for many of the other in-ear ‘phones I’ve tried). What compounds the issue is that the PS 200’s appear to be capable of two levels of fit (as judged by the degree to which they form a truly airtight seal in your ear canals): good fit—with very minor air leaks—yields good bass, but great fit—which is a bit harder to achieve—may take bass to even higher levels.
 
One other very nice aspect of the PS 200s is there very well designed (albeit slightly bulky) carrying case. The gist of things is that the interior of the case provides a hard shell chamber for the left and right earphones, spare sets of ear tips, and accessories, while the whole shebang doubles as a winding spool for the signal cables. The exterior of the case is a tough, fabric-covered wrapper that provides a nice, solid magnetic closure. Stay tuned for the full review in PB20.   

 
 
  

Comments

Joe123456789 (not verified) -- Sun, 04/12/2009 - 19:40

Excellent review of the PS 200's. 
You wrote, "The bigger question I’m wrestling with involves their overall tonal balance and bass output, which is extremely dependent on fit (more so than is the case for many of the other in-ear ‘phones I’ve tried)." 
The best way to get a comfortable fit is to consider purchasing IEMs (In Ear Monitors) which are custom fit to your ears via impressions.  The pricing for a double driver at www.earsound.com is in the ball park of the PS 200's.  The impressions took about 20 minutes in total from the time I arrived at the hearing professional's office until the time I left however I felt is was well worth it as they fit perfectly.  
Oh well, hope this helps.

Atul Kanagat -- Mon, 04/13/2009 - 08:27

Great stuff, Chris. I second Joel's motion regarding custom molded in-ear phones. There is nothing quite like it. Tremendous ( NATURAL) isolation from ambient noise, extraordinary comfort, and knockout tonal and dynamic range. I sworew by Etymotic ER4's for over twenty years till the Ultimate Ears (custom molded) hit my radar screen; now there's no going back.
In some ways, the custom fitting is analagous to having the listening room treated professionally in a two channel home audio system.

Chris Martens -- Mon, 04/13/2009 - 17:50

 Joe and Atul,
 
I've never had the opportunity to try in-ear headphones with custom ear-mold housings. I have three questions for both of you:
 
1. Do the in-ear headphones you use combine a custom-fitted, ear-mold-derived housing with rubber/silicone eartips (to create a seal in the ear canal, per se)?
 
2. Do you find that you get a truly airtight seal with your custom-fitted 'phones?
 
3. Would you recommend the 'phones you personally use as potential product review subjects for Playback, assuming that I could work out the logistics of getting the ear molds done, etc.? 
 
I'm eager to see you responses.
 
Best,
 
Chris Martens
Editor, Playback 

Chris Martens
Editor, Avguide.com/Playback/The Perfect Vision 

mcclarj@ntcna.n... -- Thu, 04/16/2009 - 13:16

Chris,
I've been reading your reviews of in-ear headphones with great interest.  I have a pair of Etymotic ER6s that I love except for two things: 1) they're difficult to insert and extract and can get uncomfortable over long periods (like international plane flights) and 2) the cables are microphonic.
You always address fit and comfort in your reviews, which is nice.  From my research, I believe custom molded plugs would be the ultimate, but they are a bit pricy for me at this point.  Probably someday soon I'll get more comfortable flanges or maybe a comparable set of in-ear headphones that fit more comfortably.
But I've never seen you mention the qualities of the cables.  My Etymotic cables are a little stiff and I can clearly hear them rub against my clothing every time I move.  I have a cheap pair of Sony earphones that have silicone covered cables that don't have this problem.  it would be great if you could start including a bit of review information about the cables.
Thanks,
John

Chris Martens -- Thu, 04/16/2009 - 16:43

 John,
 
You raise a good point, and one I'll try to take into account in future reviews (starting after the PS 200 review has published, though). 
 
Thus far I've found that two things seem to affect the microphonic properties of cables: the smoothness of their outer surfaces (more textural roughness = more noise) and the damping properties of the cable jacket material (softer material generally = less noise).
 
Re: comfort. At this stage, the reigning Playback in-ear headphone comfort champs would be the Klipsch Images (Klipsch's patented elliptical cross-section eartips make a big difference). Whenever I've let guest listeners try the Images, the feedback has consistently been that they are easy to insert and disarmingly comfortable--enough so that, on long flights, its easy to fall asleep while wearing them.
 
Chris Martens
Editor, Playback
 

Chris Martens
Editor, Avguide.com/Playback/The Perfect Vision 

All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1999 - 2011 NextScreen. All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.