First Listen: Cavalli Audio Liquid Fire Hybrid Headphone Amplifier

Posted by: Chris Martens at 5:05 pm, April 13th, 2011

Over the next several issues, Playback’s monthly email newsletters will be devoting some extra attention to headphone amplifiers, where I will evaluate some models and my colleague Tom Martin will evaluate others.

One particularly exciting new offering (and a model that Tom Martin will eventually review) is the new Cavalli Audio Liquid Fire hybrid headphone amplifier, which I first covered last June in a blog I wrote after attending the Head-Fi.org Can-Jam event in Chicago, in June 2010.

At the event, I saw and heard an initial prototype of the Cavalli Liquid Fire, which seemed very promising. Now, Playback has on hand a pilot production sample of the final version of the amp, which Dr. Alex Cavalli is manufacturing in Austin, TX and will be selling (at least for the initial production run of 20 units) for $2750/each.

 

 

Technology Backgrounder

As mentioned above, the Cavalli Liquid Fire is a hybrid headphone amp, meaning that it uses a combination of tube- and solid-state-powered output circuitry. While hybrid circuits, per se, are not new, there are several aspects of the Cavalli design that are quite unusual and distinctive.

• First, the Liquid Fire uses an entirely DC coupled hybrid circuit, meaning that there are no capacitors in the signal path at all.
• All voltage amplification is handled purely by tubes, where the tube complement includes four JJ Tesla 6922 tubes—each of which has burned-in for 25 hours prior to shipment of the amp.
• The tube section of the amplifier is fed by its own dedicated 100V power supply.
• A precise, 20-second tube heater delay circuit (with color-coded LED indicator lights) ensures that tube warm-up is complete before the tube circuit is fully engaged.
• A combination of conventional and MOSFET transistors handles all power output amplification. (The MOSFET output stage is biased at 100mA and runs in Class A almost all of the time.).
• The solid-state section of the amplifier is fed by a separate, dedicated 30V power supply.
• An opamp servo circuit ensures that DC offset is held at 0VDC.
• A precise, 20-second output delay/DC offset detection circuit (again with color coded indicator lights) ensures that power output circuitry is properly warmed up, and DC offset is properly set at 0VDC, before the headphone output jacks are enabled.
• Key amplifier components (chassis enclosure, RCore transformer, piezo-electric power switch) are US made.

The amp strives to provide a best-of-two-world’s design, combining the transparency, harmonic richness, and sonic liquidity of great tube circuits with the cleanliness, precision, and control of great solid state circuits; hence the name Liquid Fire.

 

Appearance/Changes

Those who saw and heard the Cavalli Liquid Fire prototype and CanJam Chicago 2010 will immediately notice three things about the production version Liquid Fire:

• It’s much smaller than the prototype was.
• It’s arguably even more beautiful than the prototype was.
• It sounds even better than the prototype did.

Unlike some tube amps, which cultivate a deliberately retro, son-of-1950’s-vintage-McIntosh-amps vibe, the Cavalli Liquid Fire is a distinctly and pleasingly modern design. The moderately sized amp (14” x 10” x 3.5”) is housed in a satin black enclosure that sports two front panel-mounted tube viewing windows, upon which is imprinted Cavalli’s signature “yin/yang” logo. (If you look closely, one side of the yin/yang panel features the schematic symbol for a vacuum tube, while the other features the symbol for a transistor.). Way cool.

 

The (to-my-eyes) Ferrari-esque theme of the design highlights two colors: satin black and gloss red. Thus, the Cavalli name and the Liquid Fire name are spelled out in bright red letters, and the amp’s slick piezo power switch, volume control knob, and main circuit board are similar done up in red. As the tubes warm up, red LED pilot lights on the main circuit board begin to glow, providing background illumination for your tube-viewing pleasure.

 

The Sound

I need to be careful, here, since I don’t want to take any thunder away from Tom Martin’s upcoming review of the Liquid Fire. So, rather than providing a detailed analysis of the amp’s sound, let me simply provide some initial (though I think also lasting) impressions.

Comments

David Matz -- Sun, 04/17/2011 - 22:28

Thanks for the blog post and the heads up on the introductory price.  Nice to (possibly) be able to save a few shekels.
What headphones are your initial impressions based on?
How much warmth is there due to the tubes in this amp?  Is it warmer than the Woo 22 you guys recently reviewed?
Thanks

Chris Martens -- Mon, 04/18/2011 - 15:54

Hi David,

For purposes of creating my blog, listening was done through the following headphones: Audeze LCD2, HiFiMan HE-5LE, HiFiMan HE-6, and Sennheiser HD800.

We'll have to wait for Tom Martin's review to get input on the Woo WA 22 question, since I did not have a chance to hear the Woo during its stay with us.

Best, Chris Martens

Chris Martens
Editor, Avguide.com/Playback/The Perfect Vision 

USAudio -- Thu, 04/21/2011 - 15:30

Wow, what a beauty.
Anyone know what the Liquid Fire uses for a volume control?

Chris Martens -- Wed, 04/20/2011 - 18:25

USAudio,

I don't know the answer on the volume control just yet, but expect to be talking to Dr. Cavalli in the next few days. I'll let you know what he says.

The Liquid Fire is quite a looker, isn't it? And, though my photos don't really show this, it's even better looking when you see it powered up in a darkened room (there are small red LED "running lights" located at the bases of the tubes).

Best, Chris Martens

Chris Martens
Editor, Avguide.com/Playback/The Perfect Vision 

runeight -- Wed, 04/20/2011 - 19:54

Hello gentlemen. Although I hope to talk with Chris in the next couple of days, as he noted, I thought I'd save him the trouble of an extra post. :)
The stock vol pot is a TKD 2CP-2511 50k pot. These are excellent pots and they have very smooth action.

tarquineous -- Sat, 04/23/2011 - 15:07

 This should be an excellent sounding amp. I have an Antique Sound Labs hybrid headphone amp with minor mods, and have preferred it to many others that were more expensive ($1000 to $1500). A good hybrid amp has no background noise, and gives the qualities of both tubes and solid state circuits. The Liquid Fire should be a logical step up from my ASL hybrid.

dpod4 -- Sat, 04/23/2011 - 17:35

I just listened to this amp at 32 Ohm Audio. It is incredible! I put my name in to reserve a place to buy one. Its sound is exactlly as chris martens describes here. I listened to both hi rez files and standard cd quality songs I am familiar with. What struck me was how musical and energetic it sounded. Great extension with fast grippy transients. Very transparent but equally smooth. If i had to choose one word it would be "energy" which is what i love about vinyl. I switched back and forth between liquid fire and red wine amp. No contest. The liquid fire had much better detail, musicality, punch/drive/timing/pace, and gave me front to back staging in my head which has never occurred before with headphones for me. I havelistened to 7-8 high end headphone amps. This is in a league of its own. My only complaint is the footers look cheap relative how rock solid rest of unit is. And volume control is beautiful - silky smooth precise deliberate.

USAudio -- Sat, 04/23/2011 - 18:51

Hi podeschi,
Do you know/remember what the source chain was when you listened at 32 Ohm Audio?

Also, the one at 32 Ohm Audio might have been a prototype, so the footers might have changed.
Did it look like this? http://cavalliaudio.com/products/liquid-fire-amp/

Thanks!

dpod4 -- Sun, 04/24/2011 - 15:00

Yes, they had a Gateway computer running digital files into the Red Wine Audio's Isabellina LFP-V Edition HPA's internal DAC with RCA outputs going straight into Liquid Fire.  I auditioned multiple cans including new Audeze LCD2s, some ultrasones and Beyerdynamics.  I noticed a really beefy power cord plugged into the Liquid Fire. 
The unit they had was production I believe and looked like the picture in your link.  I'm sure the feet are functional and fine, but I was comparing them to rest of the Liquid Fire, which was beautiful and begged for more elegant footers (but that is a pure nit pick on my part, and where I was sitting my line of sight was even with the bottom of unit so was staring at the feet.).  
A few hours later, and I'm missing the sound a lot...I've rarely longed after a component after hearing it.  This one had the magic.  I think I've listened to about half a dozen amps in 32 Ohm's store, and this is the only one when I heard it that made me think "I have to have it"  By the way, all the pictures I saw online don't do justice to how striking the unit is.  I appreciate a designer who builds a product that sounds and looks great.  I will always opt for the best sounding regardless of aesthetic, but nice to have both.
My listening preferences: speed, transparency, layering, micro/macro dynamics, organic non-fatiguing sound, and an analogue sound.  I found the Liquid Fire to (by a wide margin) remove all digital glare/haze and vibrantly put the music out there.  I think the energy and excitement of the sound was a great alleviation to the "in my head" issues I typically have with headphone listening. 

USAudio -- Tue, 04/26/2011 - 12:01

The next product forthcoming from Cavalli might be his solid-state "Liquid Gold" ... it will be interesting to see how it compares to the hybrid Liquid Fire ...

USAudio -- Fri, 06/03/2011 - 12:19

Is tube-rolling encouraged for the Liquid Fire?  Or does the designer feel the provided JJ Tesla 6922 tubes provide the ideal listening experience?
Based on the chassis design, with the tubes inside the enclosure, I'm assuming the latter?
Thanks!

All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1999 - 2011 NextScreen. All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.