
.jpg)
If asked, “what are the best in-ear headphones on today’s market?” a fair number of enthusiasts might have responded by naming one of Shure’s top-tier models: either the SE420 (a two-way design featuring separate, miniature woofer and tweeter drivers) or the SE530 (a two-way/three-driver design offering dual woofer drivers and a separate tweeter). Both products have, over time, won loyal followings among listeners who care deeply and passionately about sound quality. Given the strong and hard-won reputations both models have earned, one might expect them to continue to be sold as perpetual “evergreen” products—at least until something better comes along. Well, as it happens, that hypothetical “something better” has come along, in the form of updated and improved SE425 and SE535 models from Shure, which are slated to appear on the market in summer of 2010.
There’s an old adage that says, “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.” Mindful of this, Shure has wisely kept the driver elements of its new models largely the same as in their predecessors, while making two significant improvements in other areas. First, both the SE425 and SE535 come with beefier and much higher quality signal cables than were used in the original models. Having heard the beneficial effects such upgrades can bring to full-size over-the-ear headphones, we suspect this design change alone may give the new Shure in-ear ‘phones a substantially more open, detailed, and transparent sound.
But second, Shure has set up its new models so that the signal cables are, by design, detachable from the main headphone earpieces. Specifically, the signal cables, whose tips will be labeled with Left and Right-channel markings, are equipped with small, miniature gold-plated plugs that connect to matching gold-plated sockets embedded in the bodies of the headphone earpieces.
This arrangement offers several key benefits. First, the new Shures should be less susceptible to damage than traditional in-ear headphones, because a sharp tug on their cables will result only in the connector plugs pulling free from their sockets (with no harm done), rather than in broken signal wires. This is an important step forward, since a Shure spokesman advised AVguide that the overwhelming majority of so-called “headphone failures” are in fact attributable to damaged signal cables. But even in a worst-case scenario where signal cables do get damaged, the good news is that the new design allows users to buy affordable replacement cable sets, rather than having to purchase a whole new set of headphones.
One further benefit of the new design is that the SE425 and SE535 should be more comfortable to wear than their predecessors, because the headphone’s socket/plug connections will permit the headphone earpieces to swivel freely without twisting the signal cables in any way. All in all, the detachable signal-cable concept strikes us as a brilliant idea whose time has come.
The SE425, which a Shure spokesman described as having textbook “flat” frequency response, will have an MSRP of $299. The SE535, which offers slightly deeper and more powerful bass response, will have an MSRP of $499.
Watch for reviews of both models in Playback once the products are released.
For more information, visit: www.shure.com
Comments
Am skeptical:
1) Reviewer didn't actually test the product.
2) Any connection in the signal path degrades the signal. Just try inserting an extension in the SE530 earplug wires, which already have a male-female plug.
I've had the SE520 for about two and a half years and it's the best of the three different earphones I own hands down. I am currently, however, beginning to see the left earphones skin pull back from the copper cable as it enters the earpiece...I've bought some cheap sonix by lentek to hold me while I send these back for repairs. All in all, they're really great sounding earphones. BTW...what I don't like about the entire earphone segment is that they sound wildly different to different people as everyone's seal varies. I'm currently using the sorbothane like memory foam earpiece with the Shures and I'm getting a nice seal. I'd love to have one of those custom molds as that would assure the finest seal theoretically possible and, as such, guarantee the highest performance from my phones. That might just be the next thing I look into???
I meant SE530...sorry.
I just returned from the CES where I listened to the new top of the line Shure earbuds. Compared to the E4s that I have had for a couple years they are a huge improvement. I brought my own recordings along and a premium sounding Panasonic DVD LS50 player to make sure I had a good comparison setup. The new buds are great, and I also liked the sorbothane seals, they are better than the older gray rubber pieces that did not always keep their seal, which of course caused problems with the proper sound balance. The yellow foam pieces absorbed too much sound and caused frequencey balance problems, while the long white rubber pieces were too large for me. That left the mdeium gray rubber ones which were bettered by the sorbothane ones. On a relate subject, having gone through the frustration of seals that did not last when I moved too much, I paid the $400 to have custom ear molds made. I had two issues with this process. First, the person who did it (a licensed hearing specialist) had trouble with one of my ears and pushed the mold material in too far. That caused hearing loss in the high frequencies for a couple of weeks which really scared me. Fortunately that problem has cleared up, but the custom mold ear buds sound terrible! They fit very tightly so the seal is good. The problem is that when you connect the ear buds to the custom molded pieces, the sound is forced to go through a channel to get from the earbud output to the opening in the custom molded piece. Once you have heard what bad things happen when sound goes down a tube you will be ticked that you paid all that money for custom fit buds that mess the sound up! Just try talking to your friends through your cupped hands and you will hear what happens to the premium earbud sound when you put it through custom molded pieces. I am convinced that custom molded ear pieces are really only useful for folks who do 'shows' where the sound they hear has been equalized (to death) by a mixing board to compensate for the 'tunneling effect'. Save your money.
I understand your frustration after the bad results and bad experience of the Custom Ear Molds... But you should not believe ALL Custom Ear moldings produce the resonant cavity effects you describe as "Tunneling" or "speaking into cupped hands" (a good approximation).
When I bought my Shure In-Canal Earphones several years back, I purposely selected the E-1 model (which was developed from the first models made for musicians as In-Stage monitors), even when I could have purchased the then top-of-the-line model (E-5). I preferred the simpler, single driver design of the E-1 for a reason: it is much more compact and its old looking flesh color housing is very square sided, which means it can be easily grasped with two fingers and inserted properly deep into my ear canals, achieving not only the required seal (which gets the bass), but also the proper balance of highs and midrange frecuencies and clarity, which is achieved only when the acoustic port is placed in the proper location inside the ear canal. After trying the 3 options then available (yellow foam, not so soft plastic cones and the silicone three flange cups) I found the yellow foam ones comfortable enough for me (My ear canals are somewhat small), and provided good seal and external noise isolation. I also perceived a little of high frecuencies attenuation with the foam plugs, but overall those gave me the best sound. Then a friend of mine got a Ultimate Ears earphones and the vendor provided him with a custom molded tips for them. He raved about his custom moldings, so that I thought that my Shure E-1s would benefit also. My first attempt was with a hearing professional who made two sets of custom moldings from silicone resin. He was maybe too careful to avoid placing the Shure Earphones too deep inside my ear canals, and the end result was poor sounding because the tips of the earphones ports were pointed toward the canal surface, not to the tympany, so the highs were attenuated too much and lacking. I thought the idea was good enough to insist. Finally, with some careful analysis of the proper location of the sound port and its correct orientation, another Audiologist was able to make me another set of Custom Moldings here in Mexico City where Iive, and now I have the very best sound from my old (more than 5 years) Shure E-1's...
NOW: the issue of earphone cabilng becoming intermittent and failing IS very real. Be aware that heavy users are prone to wear the cabling in less than two years (or even much sooner if one pulls the cables hard enough!) AND given that the former Shure Brothers company Warranty was ONLY two years, the new design with REPLACEABLE cables is VERY good news!!!
At last someone did his homework!!! Thanks Shure, you have recovered my confidence.